Abstract
Value-at-risk (VaR) is a measure of the maximum potential change in value of a portfolio of financial assets with a given probability over a given time horizon. VaR has become a standard measure of market risk and a common practice is to compute VaR by assuming that changes in value of the portfolio are conditionally normally distributed. However, assets returns usually come from heavy-tailed distributions, so computing VaR under the assumption of conditional normality can be an important source of error. We illustrate in our application to competitive electric power prices in Alberta, Canada, that VaR estimates based on extreme value theory models, in particular the generalized Pareto distribution are, more accurate than those produced by alternative models such as normality or historical simulation.