Vibration Perception Thresholds Assessed by Two Different Methods in Healthy Subjects

Abstract

The values of vibration perception threshold (VPT) should be related to the equipment and methods of measurement that differ between European countries. ISO Standard 13091-1-2001 specifies the general guidelines regarding device facilities and measurement methodology. This study was designed to compare VPTs in healthy subjects by using two different methods of measurement. The first one was a standard technique applied currently in Poland and the second one was based on the principles of the International Standard ISO 13091-1-2001. The study comprised 187 healthy subjects, aged 17–57 years, not occupationally exposed to vibration. Both measurements of VPTs were performed using the same equipment (P-8, EmsonMat). The main differences in methodology between the Polish standard method and the method of ISO included:

different mode of stimuli presentation (ascending in standard vs. Bekesy in ISO method),

frequency range applied (63–500 Hz vs. 4–125 Hz),

probe contact force (larger in Polish method),

probe diameter (12 mm vs. 5 mm) and its surface (plane vs. rough).

The results obtained found that the mean VPTs differed significantly at the overlapping frequencies depending on the method used, the differences varied from 2.2 to 6.4 dB at frequencies 125 and 250Hz, respectively. The correlation between the thresholds obtained by both methods at these frequencies was moderate (correlation coefficients about 0.6), although statistically significant. In the ISO method, the best VPTs were found at 4 and 125 Hz. There was a poor correlation between the thresholds at the extreme frequencies (i.e. 125 and 4 Hz) and rather high between adjacent frequencies (i.e. 25 and 32 Hz). Age, weight and height were significant covariates in both measurements. The model to calculate the normative values of VPTs adjusted for explanatory factors was set up in this study. It was concluded that different methods of VPT measurement are not comparable. The ISO method seems to supply more information about skin receptors and different kinds of tough sense than the Polish standard method. In order to perform international cohort studies there is a need to establish a unified standardised method of vibrotactile sense assessment.

References

Wenemark

Lundstrom

Hagberg

Nilsson

Vibrotactile perception thresholds as determined by two different devices in a working population. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1996, 22: 204–10

Morioka

Griffin

Dependence of vibrotactile thresholds on the psychophysical measurement method. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2002, 75: 78–84

Whitehouse

Griffin

A comparison of vibrotactile thresholds obtained using different diagnostic equipment: The effect of contact conditions. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2002, 75: 85–89

Lundstrom

Stromberg

Lundborg

Vibrotactile perception threshold measurements for diagnosis of sensory neuropathy: Description of a reference population. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1992, 64: 201–207

Skov

Steenland

and Deddens

Effect of age and height on vibrotactile threshold among 1,663 U.S. workers

Am J Ind Med 1998, 34: 438–444

Hilz

Axelrod

Herman

Haertl

Deutsch

and Neundorfer

Normative values of vibratory perception thresholds in 530 children, juveniles and adults aged 3–79 years. J Neurol Sci 1998, 159: 219–225

Torgen

Swerup

. Individual factors and physical work load In relation to sensory thresholds in a middle-aged general population sample”. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2002, 86: 418–427

Dillon

W. R.

Goldstein

(1984): Multivariate Analysis. Methods and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York

Sen

Srivastava

(1991): Regression Analysis. Theory, Methods, and Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York

10.

Jobson

J. D.

(1990): Applied Multivariate Data Analysis. Volume I: Regression and Experimental Design. Springer-Verlag, New York

11.

Szmtyke

Zamyslowska E.

Sliwinska-Kowalska

Dudarewicz

Gajda

Standaryzacja nowej metodyki badania czucia wibracji. Med. Pracy 2001,: 315–320 (Polish)

12.

Harada

Griffin M. Factors Influencing vibration sense thresholds used to assess occupational exposures to hand transmitted vibration. Br J Ind Med 1991, 48: 185–192

13.

Grunert

Wertsch

Matkoub

McCallum-Burke

Reliability of sensory threshold measurement using a digital vibrogram. J Occup Med 1990, 32(2): 100–2

14.

Gerr

F.E.

Letz

Reliability of a widely used test of peripheral cutaneous vibration sensitivity and a comparison of two testing protocols. Br J Ind Med 1988, 45, 635–639

15.

Lofvenberg

Johansson

. Regional differences and interindividual variability in sensitivity to vibration in the glabrous skin of the human hand. Brain Res, 1984, 28; 301(1):65–72

16.

Lindsel

Griffin

. Normative data for vascular and neurological tests of the hand-arm vibration syndrome. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 2002, 75: 43–54

17.

Gescheider

Bolanowski

Hall

Hoffman

Verrillo

. The effects of aging on information processing channels in the sense of touch: I. Absolute sensitivity. Somatosensory and Motor Research, 1994, 11: 345–357

18.

Stevens

Cruz

Marks

and Lakatos

A multimodal assessment of sensory thresholds in aging. J Gerontology: Psychological Sciences 1998, 53B, 4: 263–272.

19.

Stevens

Choo

Temperature sensitivity of the body surface over the life span. Somatosens Mot Res 1998; 15: 13–28

20.

Halonen

Quantitative vibration perception thresholds in healthy subjects of working age. Eur J Appl Physiol 1986; 54: 647–655

21.

Gerr

Letz

Covariates of human peripheral nerve function II: Vibrotactile and thermal thresholds. Neurotoxicol and Teratol 1994, 16: 105–112

22.

Bartlett

Stewart

Tamblyn

Abrahamowicz

Normal distributions of thermal and vibration sensory thresholds. Muscle Nerve 1998; 21: 367–374.

23.

ISO 13091–1–2001 Mechanical vibration – Vibrotactile perception thresholds for the assessment of nerve dysfunction – Part 1: Methods of measurements on the fingertips.