Seven form-finding methods for tensegrity structures are reviewed and classified. The three kinematical methods include an analytical approach, a non-linear optimisation, and a pseudo-dynamic iteration. The four statical methods include an analytical method, the formulation of linear equations of equilibrium in terms of force densities, an energy minimisation, and a search for the equilibrium configurations of the struts of the structure connected by cables whose lengths are to be determined, using a reduced set of equilibrium equations. It is concluded that the kinematical methods are best suited to obtaining only configuration details of structures that are already essentially known. The force density method is best suited to searching for new configurations, but affords no control over the lengths of the elements of the structure. The reduced coordinates method offers a greater control on elements lengths, but requires more extensive symbolic manipulations.
SkeltonR.E., Deployable tendon-controlled structure, United States Patent 5,642,590, July 1, 1997.
3.
CasparD.L.D.KlugA., Physical principles in the construction of regular viruses, Proceedings of Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology, 1962, 27, 1–24.
4.
IngberD.E., Cellular tensegrity: Defining new rules of biological design that govern the cytoskeleton, Journal of Cell Science, 104, 1993, 613–627.
5.
MarksR.FullerR.B., The Dymaxion World of Buckminster Fuller, Reinhold Publications, New York, 1960.
6.
FullerR.B., Tensile-integrity structures, United States Patent 3,063,521, November 13, 1962.
7.
SnelsonK.D., Continuous tension, discontinuous compression structures, United States Patent 3,169,611, February 16, 1965.
8.
PughA., An Introduction to Tensegrity, University of California Press, Berkeley, California, 1976.
9.
MotroR., Tensegrity systems: The state of the art, International Journal of Space Structures, 7 (2), 1992, 75–83.
VassartN.MotroR., Multiparametered form finding method: Application to tensegrity systems, International Journal of Space Structures, 14 (2), 1999, 147–154.
12.
SultanC.CorlessM.SkeltonR.E., Reduced prestressability conditions for tensegrity structures, Proceedings of 40th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 12–15 April 1999, St Louis, MO, AIAA, 1999.
13.
PellegrinoS., Mechanics of kinematically indeterminate structures, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge, U.K., 1986.
14.
MathWorks, Matlab User's Guide, version 5, 1997.
15.
DayA.BunceJ., The analysis of hanging roofs, Arup Journal, September, 1969, 30–31.
16.
BarnesM.R., Form-finding and analysis of prestressed nets and membranes, Computers & Structures, 30 (3), 1988, 685–695.
17.
MotroR., Forms and forces in tensegrity systems, In: NooshinH. ed., Proceedings of Third International Conference on Space Structures, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1984, 180–185.
18.
BelkacemS., Recherche de forme par relaxation dynamique des structures reticules spatiales autocontraintes, Ph.D. Dissertation, Universite Paul Sabatier de Toulouse, 1987.
19.
MotroR., Tensegrity systems and geodesic domes, International Journal of Space Structures, 5 (3–4), 1990, 341–351.
20.
MotroR.BelkacemS.VassartN., Form finding numerical methods for tensegrity systems, In: AbelJ.F.LeonardJ.W.PenalbaC.U. ed., Proceedings of IASS-ASCE International Symposium on Spatial, Lattice and Tension Structures, Atlanta, USA, ASCE, 1994, 707–713.
21.
KennerH., Geodesic Math and How to Use It, University of California Press, Berkeley, California, 1976.
22.
LinkwitzK.SchekH.-J., Einige Bemerkungen zur Berechnung von vorgespannten Seilnetzkonstruktionen, Ingenieur Archiv, 1971, 145–158.
23.
SchekH.-J., The force density method for form finding and computation of general networks, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 3, 1974, 115–134.
24.
LinkwitzK., Formfinding by the “direct approach” and pertinent strategies for the conceptual design of prestressed and hanging structures, International Journal of Space Structures, 14 (2), 1999, 73–87.
25.
SouthwellR.V., An Introduction to the Theory of Elasticity, Dover Publications, New York, 1969.
26.
BarnesM.R., Applications of dynamic relaxation to the design of cable, membrane and pneumatic structures., In: SuppleW.J. ed., Proceedings of Second International Conference on Space Structures, Guildford, 1975.
27.
LaiC.Y.YouZ.PellegrinoS., Shape of deployable membrane reflectors, ASCE Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 11 (July), 1998, 73–80.
28.
VassartN., Recherche de forme et stabilité des systémes réticulés spatiaux autocontraints: Applications aux systémes de tenségrité, Ph.D. Dissertation, Université des Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc, Montpellier, France, 1997.
ConnellyR., Rigidity and energy, Inventiones Mathematicae, 66 (1), 1982, 11–33.
31.
KötterE., Über die Möglichkeit, n Punkte in der Ebene oder im Raume durch weniger als 2n - 3 oder 3n - 6 Stäbe von ganz unveränderlicher Länge unverschieblich miteinander zu verbinden, In: Festschrift Heinrich Müller-Breslau, A. Kröner, Leipzig, 1912, 61–80.
32.
ConnellyR., Tensegrity structures: Why are they stable?, In: ThorpeM.F.DuxburyP.M. ed., Rigidity theory and applications, Plenum Press, New York, 1999, p. 47–54.
33.
ConnellyR.BackA., Mathematics and tensegrity, American Scientist, 86 (2), 1998, 142–151.
34.
SultanC., Modeling, design, and control of tensegrity structures with applications, Ph.D. Dissertation, Purdue University, 1999.
35.
StrangG., Linear Algebra and its Applications, Third edition, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College, San Diego, 1988.
36.
PellegrinoS., Structural computations with the Singular Value Decomposition of the equilibrium matrix, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 30 (21), 1993, 3025–3035.
