A prerequisite for meaningful environmental legislation is that it be based upon an adequate scientific understanding of the natural system to which it is applied. In 2003, the Australian Commonwealth and Queensland State governments introduced a Reef Water Quality Protection Plan, which aimed to “improve” water quality in river catchments adjacent to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) and in nearby coastal waters. The Plan was introduced in the absence of any substantive evidence for regional degradation of GBR water quality. This paper reviews the available data regarding nutrient contents in the Tully River, north Queensland, which is cited as the best (available) evidence for human-related changes in nutrient export from (GBR) catchments [1]. It is shown that the claim of human-related nutrient enrichment in the Tully River, and regionally, is without substance. No detectable trends in GBR water quality have occurred since systematic measurements were first started in the 1980s. Environmental policies that are based on mischievous claims of chimerical damage to the Great Barrier Reef damage the reputation of science as a tool for disinterested analysis, and provoke widespread cynicism in the community regarding the integrity of contemporary environmental politics.
BakerJ.T., 2003. A report on the study of land-sourced pollutants and impacts on water quality in and adjacent to the Great Barrier Reef. Intergovernmental Steering Committee, GBR Water Quality Action Plan, Premier's Department, Queensland Government, Brisbane, 1–187.
4.
Productivity Commission, 2003a. Industries in the Great Barrier Reef Catchment & Measures to Address Declining Water Quality. Draft Research Report, 306 pp.
EyreB., 1993. Nutrients in sediments of a tropical north-eastern Australian estuary, catchment and nearshore coastal zone. Australian Journal of Marine & Freshwater Research44, 845–866.
8.
SweatmanH.OsborneK.SmithL.GrubbaT.KinchJ.JonesG. & RaiV., 2002. Status of coral reefs of Australasia: Australia and Papua New Guinea. In: WilkinsonC.“Status of the Coral Reefs of the World 2002”, Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, pp.163–180.
JohnstonA.WalkerD. & WoodA.1997. Spatial analysis of the impact of land use on nutrient loads in the Herbert River catchment. Sugar Research & Development Corporation, Final Report - Project CSC13S, 1–90.
Van WoesikR. & DoneT.J., 1997. Coral communities and reef growth in the southern Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs16, 103–115.
17.
van WoesikR.TomascikT. & BlakeS., 1999. Coral assemblages and physico-chemical characteristics of the Whitsunday Islands: Evidence of recent community changes. Marine & Freshwater Research, 50, 427–440.
18.
AnthonyK.R.N., 2000. Enhanced particle-feeding capacity of corals on turbid reefs (Great Barrier Reef, Australia). Coral Reefs19: 59–67.
19.
LarcombeP. & WoolfeK.J., 1999. Increased sediment supply to the Great Barrier Reef will not increase sediment accumulation at most coral reefs. Coral Reefs18, 163–169.
20.
PottsD.C. & JacobsJ.R., 2003. Evolution of reef-building scleractinian corals in turbid environments: A paleo-ecological hypothesis. In: 9th International Coral Reef Symposium (Bali, October 2000), Proceedings, 249–254.
21.
SmithersS. & LarcombeP., 2003. Late-Holocene initiation and growth of a nearshore turbid-zone coral reef: Paluma Shoals, central Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Coral Reefs, 22, 499–505.
22.
JohnsonD.P. & RiskM.J., 1987. Fringing reef growth on a terrigenous mud foundation, Fantome Island, central Great Barrier Reef. Sedimentology34, 275–287.
23.
ChappellJ.ChivasA.WallenskyE.PolachH.A. & AharonP., 1983. Holocene paleo-environmental changes, central to north Great Barrier Reef inner zone. Bureau of Mineral Resources Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics8, 223–236.
24.
JohnsonD.P. & CarterR.M., 1987. Sedimentary framework of mainland fringing reef development, Cape Tribulation area. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Technical Memorandum14, 37 pp.
25.
LoughJ.M. & BarnesD.J., 2000. Environmental control on growth of the massive coral Porites. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology & Ecology245, 225–243.
26.
DevlinM.J. & BrodieJ., 2005. Terrestrial discharge into the Great Barrier Reef lagoon: Nutrient behaviour in coastal waters. Marine Pollution Bulletin51, 9–22.
27.
OrpinA.R.RiddP.V. & StewartL.K., 1999. Assessment of the relative importance of major sediment-transport mechanisms in the central Great Barrier Reef lagoon. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences46, 883–896.
28.
CavanaghJ.E.BurnsK.A.BrunskillG.J. & CoventryR.J., 1999. Organochlorine pesticide residues in soils and sediments of the Herbert and Burdekin River regions, north Queensland - implications for contamination of the Great Barrier Reef. Marine Pollution Bulletin39, 367–375.
29.
HaynesD.RalphP.PrangeJ., & DennisonW., 2000. The impact of the herbicide diuron on photosynthesis in three species of tropical seagrass. Marine Pollution Bulletin41, 2288–293.
30.
PrangeJ.A.GausC.PapkeO. & MullerJ.F., 2002. Investigations into the PCDD contamination of topsoil, river sediments & kaolinite clay in Queensland, Australia. Chemosphere46, 1335–1342.
31.
Department of Natural Resources & Mines (DNRM), 2002. River water quality in the the Pioneer catchment on February 14–15, 2002. Report issued 2 July, Queensland Government, 11 pp.
32.
BungeM.AdrianL.KrausA.OpelM.LorenzW.G.AndreesenJ.R.GorischH. & LechnerU., 2003. Reductive dehalogenation of chlorinated dioxins by an anaerobic bacterium. Nature421, 357–360.
33.
WoodR.1999“Reef Evolution”. Oxford University Press, 414 pp.
34.
LoyaY., 1990. Changes in a Red Sea coral community structure: A long-term case history study. In: WoodwellG.M. (ed.), “The Earth in Transition: Patterns and Processes of Biotic Impoverishment”, Cambridge, pp. 369–384.
35.
TomascikT.van WoesikR. & MahA.1996Rapid coral colonisation of a recent lava flow following a volcanic eruption, Banda Islands, Indonesia. Coral Reefs15, 169–175.
36.
MitchellA.W. & FurnasM.J., 1996. Terrestrial inputs of nutrients and suspended sediments to the GBR lagoon. In; “The Great Barrier Reef - Science, Use and Management. Reef CRC, GBRMPA and JCU, Townsville, pp. 59–71.
37.
MitchellA.W.BramleyR.G.V. & JohnsonA.K.L., 1997. Export of nutrients and suspended sediment during a cyclone-mediated flood event in the Herbert River catchment, Australia. Marine & Freshwater Research48, 79–88.
38.
McCullochM.FallonS.WyndhamT.HendyE.LoughJ. & BarnesD., 2003. Coral record of increased sediment flux to the inner Great Barrier Reef since European settlement. Nature421, 727–730.
39.
UlmanW.J. & SandstromM.W., 1987. Dissolved nutrient fluxes from nearshore sediments of Bowling Green Bay, Central Great Barrier Reef Lagoon (Australia). Estuarine, Coastal & Shelf Science24, 289–303.
40.
LoureyM.J.AlongiD.M.RyanD.A.J. & DevlinM.J., 2001. Variability of nutrient regeneration rates and nutrient concentrations in surface sediments of the northern Great Barrier Reef shelf. Continental Shelf Research21, 145–155.
41.
FurnasM. J., 1990. The nutrient status of Great Barrier Reef waters. In: YellowleesD. (ed.), “Land Use Patterns and Nutrient Loading of the Great Barrier Reef Region”, James Cook University, pp. 162–179.
42.
HatcherB.G. & LarkumA.W.D., 1983. An experimental analysis of factors controlling the standing crop of the epilithic algal community on a coral reef. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology69, 61–84.
43.
LarcombeP. & WoolfeK.J., 1999. Increased sediment supply to the Great Barrier Reef will not increase sediment accumulation at most coral reefs. Coral Reefs18, 163–169.
HughesT.P. & ConnellJ.H., 1999. Multiple stressors on coral reefs: A long term perspective. Limnology & Oceanography44, 932–940.
46.
WilhelmG. (ed.) 2001. Water quality report for catchments containing sugar cane in Queensland, 1 May 1995 – 30 April, 2000. Queensland Natural Resources and Mines Water Quality Monitoring Group.
