Effects of aperture diffraction on reverberant energy decay in coupled-room auditoria are estimated at mid frequencies, defined as frequencies above the Schroeder frequencies of subrooms, but having wavelengths of the order of the characteristic dimensions of apertures. Hybrid models are developed that account for wave effects at apertures but treat sound fields in subrooms using high-frequency models. The models give more accurate estimates of the random-incidence power transmission coefficient. These estimates agree well with independent measurements of circular apertures in thin, hard screens. When used to predict the effects of diffraction in a schematic representation of typical coupled-room auditoria, new mid-frequency models suggest that effects of diffraction on decay curves, while smaller than variations due to input-parameter uncertainty, are large enough to be audible.
References
1.
EyringC.F. (1931) Reverberation time measurement in coupled rooms. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.Vol. 3, pp. 181–206.
2.
LyleC. D. (1981) The prediction of steady state sound levels in naturally coupled enclosures. Acoust. Lett.Vol. 5, pp. 16–21; Sound decays in a semipartioned rectangular enclosure with non-uniform absorption, and comparison with geometric theory. ibid., pp. 30–34.
3.
MorseP. M., and IngardU. K. (1968) Theoretical Acoustics, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 687–688.
4.
SummersJ. E.TorresR. R., and ShimizuY. (2004) Statistical-acoustics models of energy decay in systems of coupled rooms and their relation to geometrical acoustics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.Vol. 116, pp. 958–969.
5.
DalenbäckB.-I. L. (1996) Room acoustic prediction based on a unified treatment of diffuse and specular reflection. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.Vol. 100, pp. 899–909.
6.
DalenbäckB.-I. L. (1999) Verification of prediction based on Randomized Tail-Corrected cone-tracing and array modeling, on the CD-ROM: Berlin, March 14–19, Collected Papers, 137th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and the 2nd Convention of the European Acoustical Association (ISBN 3-9804458-5-4, available from Deutsche Gesellschaft für Akustik, Fachbereich Physik, Universität Oldenburg, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany), paper 3pAAa1. [(1999) J. Acoust. Soc. Am.Vol. 105, p. 1173 (A).]
7.
SummersJ. E. (2003) Reverberant acoustic energy in auditoria that comprise systems of coupled rooms. Ph.D. Thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, Department of Engineering Science. (Electronic copies may be obtained from the author.)
8.
KuttruffH. (2000) Room Acoustics, 4th Ed., Spon Press, New York, pp. 45–46.
9.
BouwkampC. J. (1954) Diffraction Theory. Repts. Prog. Phys.Vol. 17, pp. 35–100.
10.
TintiS. (1979) Diffraction by a thick slitted screen. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.Vol. 65, pp. 888–895.
11.
JunK. H., and EomH. J. (1995) Acoustic scattering from a circular aperture in a thick hard screen. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.Vol. 98, pp. 2324–2327.
12.
HongoK., and SerizawaH. (1999) Diffraction of an acoustic plane wave by a rectangular hole in an infinitely large rigid screen. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.Vol. 106, pp. 29–35.
13.
PierceA. D.CleavlandR. O., and ZampolliM. (2002) Radiation impedance matrices for rectangular interfaces within rigid baffles: Calculation methodology and applications. J. Acoust Soc. Am.Vol. 111, pp. 672–684.
14.
ParkH. H., and EomH. J. (1997) Acoustic scattering from a rectangular aperture in a thick hard screen. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.Vol. 101, 595–598 (L).
15.
SerizawaH., and HongoK. (2002) Evaluation of an acoustic plane wave transmitted through a rectangular hole in a thick hard screen. Wave MotionVol. 36, pp. 103–117.
16.
SandströmS.-E. (1995) Scalar diffraction by rectangular apertures in a thick screen. J. Mod. Opt.Vol. 42, pp. 965–983.
17.
SeoJ. S.EomH. J., and LeeH. S. (2000) Acoustic scattering from two circular apertures in a thick hard plane. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.Vol. 107, pp. 2338–2343.
18.
MilesJ. W. (1982) On Rayleigh scattering by a grating. Wave MotionVol. 4, pp. 285–292.
19.
SumbatyanM. A. (1995) Low-frequency penetration of acoustic waves through a periodic arbitrary shaped grating: The three-dimensional problem. Wave MotionVol. 22, pp. 133–144.
20.
MakitaY., and HidakaT. (1987) Revision of the cos θ law of oblique incident sound energy and modification of the fundamental formulations in geometrical acoustics in accordance with the revised law. AcusticaVol. 63, pp. 163–173.
21.
KangH.-J.IhJ.-G.KimH.-S., and KimJ.-S. (2002) An experimental investigation on the directional distribution of incident energy for the prediction of sound transmission loss. Appl. Acoust.Vol. 63, pp. 283–294; see also comments: ibid.Vol. 64, p. 533; reply: ibid, pp. 535–537; and comments on reply: ibid. p. 539.
22.
MulhollandK.A., and ParbrookH.D. (1967) Transmission of sound through apertures of negligible thickness. J. Sound Vib.Vol. 5, pp. 499–508.
23.
MilesJ. W. (1952) On acoustic diffraction cross sections for oblique incidence. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.Vol. 24, p. 324 (L).
24.
KellerJ. B. (1962) Geometrical theory of diffraction. J. Opt. Soc. Am.Vol. 52, pp. 116–130.
25.
BenedettoG., and SpagnoloR. (1984) A study of barriers in enclosures by a ray-tracing computer model. Appl. Acoust.Vol. 17, pp. 183–199.
26.
TsingosN.FunkhouserT.NganA., and CarlbomI. (2001) Modeling acoustics in virtual environments using the uniform theory of diffraction. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH '01), Los Angeles.
27.
KarpS. N., and KellerJ. B. (1961) Multiple-order diffractions by an aperture in a hard screen. Opt. ActaVol. 8, pp. 61–72.
28.
TorresR. R.SvenssonU. P., and KleinerM. (2001) Computation of edge diffraction for more accurate room acoustics auralization. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.Vol. 109, pp. 600–610.
29.
SummersJ. E. (2003) Comments on “Absorbing surfaces in ray-tracing programs for coupled spaces.”Appl. Acoust.Vol. 64, pp. 825–831.
30.
ErmannM., and JohnsonM. E. (2002) Pilot study: Exposure and materiality of the secondary room and its impact in the impact of the impulse response of coupled-room concert halls. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.Vol. 111, p. 2331 (A).
31.
PicardD. (2003) Audibility of non-exponential reverberation decays. Rapport de Stage D'Option Scientifique, Ecole Polytechnique, Paris and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, Program in Architectural Acoustics.
32.
ColemanR. (1981) Intercept lengths of random probes through boxes. J. Appl. Probab.Vol. 18, pp. 276–282.
33.
ISO 3382 (1997) Acoustics – Measurement of the reverberation time of rooms with reference to other parameters.
34.
KawakamiF., and YamaguchiK. (1981) Space-ensemble average of reverberation decay curves. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.Vol. 70, pp. 1071–1082.
35.
PlengeG. (1965/1966) Über die Hörbarkeit von Äderungen im Frequenzgang der Nachhallzeit. (On the audibility of variations in the frequency response of reverberation time.)AcusticaVol. 16, pp. 269–278.
36.
AtalB. S.SchroederM. R., and SesslerG. M. (1965) Subjective reverberation time and its relation to sound decay. Proceedings of the 5th ICA, Liège, paper G 32; M. R. Schroeder (1970) Digital simulation of sound transmission in reverberant spaces. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.Vol. 47, pp. 424–431.
37.
KnightD. P. (2003) Audibility of non-exponential energy decay in running reverberation. M.S. Thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, Program in Architectural Acoustics.
