Methodology of Long-Term Real-Time Condition Assessment for Existing Cable-Stayed Bridges

Abstract

Difficulty in measuring the total stress of bridge girders in service (due to dead, live, and environmental loads) raises a significant problem in assessing existing cable-stayed bridges without a complete monitoring record from construction to service. To address this problem, this paper develops a practical monitoring methodology that needs to focus only on the variation of the bridge condition during the service period. In the proposed methodology, the variation of the bridge condition is considered with respect to two sub-conditions: the long-term load condition and the service live load condition. Using the varying cable forces as a reflection of the long- term load condition, the effect of time-dependent loads can be entirely traced back from the present to the bridge's completion. The service live load condition is real-time monitored using strain sensors distributed across different cross-sections. Specific bridge design codes are used to set up the assessment criterion by specifying the stress threshold envelopes for checking each sub-condition of the bridge. By using a three-dimensional solid finite element model in the study of service live load condition, it becomes feasible to arrange measurement stations at the exactly same positions as those on the real structure. A case study is conducted through which the advantages of the proposed methodology are demonstrated.

Keywords

condition assessment existing cable-stayed bridge variation of bridge condition long-term load condition service live load condition specific bridge design codes finite element model

References

Aktan

A.E.

Farhey

D.N.

Brown

D.L.

Dalai

Helmicki

A.J.

Hunt

V.J.

and Shelley

S.J.

(1996). “Condition assessment for bridge management”, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, ASCE, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 108–117.

Aktan

A.E.

Farhey

D.N.

Helmicki

A.J.

Brown

D.L.

Hunt

V.J.

Lee

K.L.

and Levi

(1997). “Structural identification for condition assessment: Experimental arts”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 123, No. 12, pp. 1674–1684.

Aktan

A.E.

Catbas

Turer

and Zhang

(1998). “Structural identification: Analytical aspects”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 124, No. 7, pp. 817–829.

Ferregut

C.M.

Osegueda

R.A.

and Ortiz

(1995). “Artificial neural networks for structural damage detection and classification”, Proceedings of SPIE – The International Society for Optical Engineering, San Diego, Ca., U.S.A., pp. 68–80.

JTG D60 (2004). General Code for Design of Highway Bridges and Culverts, China Communications Press, Beijing, China, (in Chinese)

JTG D62 (2004). Code for Design of Highway Reinforced Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Bridges and Culverts, China Communications Press, Beijing, China, (in Chinese)

Huang

D.J.

L.P.

Han

Z.P.

and Qian

Y.L.

(1998). “Zhao Bao Shan bridge design”, 13^th Annual Domestic Bridge Conference, Shanghai, China, pp. 64–70. (in Chinese)

Kim

S. H.

Lee

S.W.

and Mha

H.S.

(2001). “Fatigue reliability assessment of an existing steel railroad bridge”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 23, No. 10, pp. 1203–1211.

Z.X.

Chan

T.H.T.

and Ko

J.M.

(2002). “Determination of effective stress range and its application on fatigue stress assessment of existing bridges”, International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 39, No. 9, pp. 2401–2417.

10.

Z.D.

Qin

S.Q.

Zhu

H.M.

and Meng

Q.B.

(2001). “Research on the project of partial-dismantling and rehabilitation of the main bridge of Zhaobaoshan bridge in Ningbo”, Bridge Construction, No. 3, pp. 1–7. (in Chinese)

11.

Mazurek

D.F.

and DeWolf

J.T.

(1990). “Experimental study of bridge monitoring technique”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 116, No. 9, pp. 2532–2549.

12.

K.H.

and Fairfield

C.A.

(2002). “Monte Carlo simulation for arch bridge assessment”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 271–280.

13.

Natke

H.G.

Doll

and Hildebrandt

(1995). “Bridge condition assessment using an expert system”, Structural Engineering Review, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 165–180.

14.

O'Connor

and Enevoldsen

(2008). “Probability based modeling and assessment of an existing post-tensioned concrete slab bridge”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 1408–1416.

15.

Sasmal

and Ramanjaneyulu

(2008). “Condition evaluation of existing reinforced concrete bridges using fuzzy based analytic hierarchy approach”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 1430–1443.

16.

Tan

D.L.

(2005). Key Studies of Bridge Structural Condition Assessment Based on Monitoring, PhD Thesis, Tongji University, Shanghai, China, pp. 1–8. (in Chinese)

17.

Wang

P.H.

Tang

T.Y.

and Zheng

H.N.

(2004). “Analysis of cable-stayed bridges during construction by cantilever methods”, Computers and Structures, Vol. 82, No. 4–5, pp. 329–346.