Under extreme loading conditions such as an earthquake event considerable amount of energy is imparted to a structure. To protect the structure and to minimize damages, a method is to divert a portion of the input energy into designated energy dissipating devices. A new energy dissipation device is presented in this paper. The device is referred to as Buckling-Restrained-Lug (BRL) which can be incorporated in structural joints. The device is composed of a short segment of a steel strut embedded inside a mortar filled jacket which makes the BRL's capacity governed by the squash load under axial tension or compression. The BRL dissipates energy through axial yielding of the steel strut. Analytical, finite element modeling and experimental results of the proposed BRL are presented and compared. Implementation of the BRL in a beam-to-column connection that results in a dissipative partial-moment-resisting joint is proposed. Based on the obtained results, the paper advocates the consideration of the BRL as a viable, compact and low-cost passive energy dissipation device.
ABAQUS (2009). ABAQUS User's Manual, Simulia Inc, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
2.
AbolmaaliA.KukretiA.MotahariA. and GhassemiehM. (2009). “Energy dissipation characteristics of semi-rigid connections”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 65, No. 5, pp. 1187–1197.
3.
BergmanD.M. and GoelS.C. (1987). Evaluation of Cyclic Testing of Steel Plate Devices for Added Damping and Stiffness, Report No. UMCE87–10, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
4.
BlackC.J.MakrisN. and AikenI.D. (2004). “Component testing, seismic evaluation and characterization of buckling-restrained braces”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 130, No. 6, pp. 880–894.
5.
ChanR.W.K. and AlbermaniF. (2008). “Experimental study of steel slit damper for passive energy dissipation”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 1058–1066.
6.
ChanR.W.K.AlbermaniF. and WilliamsM.S. (2009). “Evaluation of yielding shear panel device for passive energy dissipation”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 260–268.
7.
ChouC.C. and ChenS.Y. (2010). “Subassemblage tests and finite element analyses of sandwiched buckling-restrained braces”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 2108–2121.
8.
ClarkP.AikenI.KasaiK.KoE. and KimuraI. (1999). “Design procedures for buildings incorporating hysteretic damping devices”, Proceeding of the 69th Annual Convention, Sacramento, CA, USA, pp. 355–372.
9.
FahnestockL.A.RiclesJ.M. and SauseR. (2007). “Experimental evaluation of a large-scale buckling-restrained brace frame”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 133, No. 9, pp. 1205–1214.
10.
FahnestockL.A.SauseR. and RiclesJ.M. (2007). “Seismic response and performance of buckling-restrained braced frames”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 133, No. 9, pp. 1195–1204.
11.
GhabraieK.ChanR.W.K.HuangX. and XieY.M. (2010). “Shape optimization of metallic yielding devices for passive mitigation of seismic energy”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 2258–2267.
12.
Lenton (2006). Taper Threaded Rebar Splicing Systems, Erico International Corporation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
13.
MazzolaniF.M. and PilusoV. (1996). Theory and Design of Seismic Resistant Steel Frames, E&FN Spon, UK.
14.
SabelliR.MahinS. and ChangC. (2003). “Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 655–666.
SAC (1996b). Technical Report: Experimental Investigations of Beam-Column Subassemblies, Rep. No.SAC-96-01, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, California, USA.
17.
SoongT.T. and SpencerB.F.Jr. (2002). “Supplemental energy dissipation: State-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 243–259.
18.
SymansM.D.CharneyF.A.WhittakerA.S.ConstantinouM.C.KircherC.A.JohnsonM.W. and McNamaraR.J. (2008). “Energy dissipation systems for seismic applications: Current practice and recent developments”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 134, No. 1, pp. 3–21
19.
TakeuchiaT.HajjarJ.F.MatsuiaR.NishimotoK. and AikenI.D. (2010). “Local buckling restraint condition for core plates in buckling restrained braces”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 66, No. 2, pp. 139–149.
20.
TsaiK.ChenH.HongC. and SuY. (1993). “Design of steel triangular plate energy absorbers for seismic-resistant construction”, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 9, No. 33, pp. 505–528.
21.
TsaiK.C.HsiaoP.C.WangK.J.WengY.T.LinM.L.LinK.C. and ChenC.H. (2008). “Pseudo-dynamic tests of a full scale CFT/BRB frame-Part: Specimen design, experiment and analysis”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 37, No. 7, pp. 1081–1098.
22.
UangC.M.YuQ.S.NoelS. and GrossJ. (2000). “Cyclic testing of steel moment connections rehabilitated with RBS or welded haunch”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 126, No. 1, pp. 57–68.
23.
WatanabeA.HitomiY.SaekiE.WadaA. and FujimotoM. (1988). “Properties of brace encased in buckling-restraining concrete and steel tube”, Proceeding of 9th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, pp. 719–724.
