Acoustic Emission Assessment of Through-Thickness Fatigue Crack Growth in Steel Members

Abstract

The understanding of crack behavior under fatigue remains a critical issue in addressing the performance of steel bridges. Single edge notches in general provide a very well defined load and fatigue crack size and shape environment for estimation of the stress intensity factor K, which is not found in welded elements. ASTM-E647 SE(T) specimens do not appear to provide ideal boundary conditions for proper recording of acoustic wave propagation and crack growth behavior observed in steel bridges, but do provide standard fatigue crack growth rate data. Acoustic emission (AE) has been increasingly used for assessment and prediction of fatigue cracks in steel bridge members. In steel bridge members, AE transducers are commonly attached to the surface of the plate from which the crack is initiated, hence producing a through-thickness crack growth monitored by the transducer. A modified version of the SE(T) specimen was developed in order to maintain similitude with the field crack propagation orientation and to provide a small-scale specimen with improved AE characteristics while maintaining accuracy of fatigue crack growth rate (da/dN) versus stress intensity factor range (ΔK). The specimen simulates fatigue cracks in flanges or early stage of crack growth in webs of steel bridge members. Effects of load ratio (R) and material on AE data recorded during the crack growth was addressed. Applicability of AE to capture, locate and predict the behavior of the growing crack was positively verified. R ratio showed to have a significant effect on evolution of AE data captured during the test.

References

ASTM E561 (2011). Standard Test Method for K–R Curve Determination. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, pp. 1–16.

ASTM E976 (2010). Standard Guide for Determining the Reproducibility of Acoustic Emission Sensor Response, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, pp. 1–7.

ASTM Standard E647–11e1 (2011). Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, pp. 1–49.

Bassim

M.N.

Lawrence

S.S.

and Liu

C.D.

(1994). “Detection of the onset of fatigue crack growth in rail steels using acoustic emission”, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 207–214.

Chen

H.L.

and Choi

J.H.

(2004). “Acoustic emission study of fatigue cracks in materials used for AVLB”, Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 133–151.

Chotickai

(2001). Acoustic Emission monitoring of Prestressed Bridge Girders with Premature Concrete Deterioration, Master's Thesis. University of Texas, Austin, Texas.

Daniel

I.M.

Luo

J.J.

Sifniotopoulos

C.G.

and Chun

H.J.

(1998). “Acoustic emission monitoring of fatigue damage in metals”, Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 14, pp. 71–87.

Fisher

J.W.

Hausammann

Sullivan

M.D.

and Pense

A.W.

(1979). Detection and Repair of Fatigue Damage in Welded Highway Bridges, NCHRP Report 206, Washington, D.C., USA.

Fowler

Blessing

Conlisk

and Swanson

(1989). “The MONPAC system”, Journal of Acoustic Emission, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 1–8.

10.

Fowler

T.J.

Blessing

J.A.

and Conlisk

P.J.

(1989). “New directions in testing”, Third International Symposium on Acoustic Emission from Composite Materials, Paris, France, (July 17–21), pp. 16–27.

11.

Golaski

Gebski

and Ono

(2002). “Diagnostics of reinforced concrete bridges by acoustic emission”, Journal of Acoustic Emission, Vol. 20, pp. 83–98.

12.

Gong

and Nyborg

E.O.

(1992). “Acoustic emission monitoring of steel railroad bridges”, Materials Evaluation, Vol. 50, No. 7, pp. 883–887.

13.

Gostautas

R.S.

Ramirez

Peterman

R.J.

and Meggers

(2005). “Acoustic emission monitoring and analysis of glass fiber-reinforced composites bridge decks”, Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 713–721.

14.

Hamel

Bailon

J.P.

and Bassim

M.N.

(1981). “Acoustic emission mechanisms during high-cycle fatigue”, Journal of Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 853–860.

15.

Harris

D.O.

and Dunegan

H.L.

(1974). “Continuous monitoring of fatigue-crack growth by acoustic-emission techniques”, Experimental Mechanics, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 71–81.

16.

Lindley

T.C.

Palmer

I.G.

and Richards

C.E.

(1978). “Acoustic emission monitoring of fatigue crack growth”, Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 1–15.

17.

Metrovich

and Fisher

J.W.

(2005). “Fatigue Strength of Stainless Steel Weldments”, International Journal of Steel Structures, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 189–197.

18.

Metrovich

and Fisher

J.W.

(2006), “Use of weld toe stress singularities in evaluating stress intensity factors for welded details”, Journal of Bridge Structures Assessment, Design and Construction, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 199–206.

19.

Nair

and Cai

C.S.

(2010). “Acoustic emission monitoring of bridges: Review and case studies”, Journal of Engineering Structures, ASCE, Vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 1704–1714.

20.

Nemati

(2012). Acoustic Emission Assessment of Through-Thickness Fatigue Crack Propagation, PhD Thesis, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL.

21.

Nemati

Metrovich

and Nanni

(2014). “Effects of test parameters on fracture and fatigue characteristics of a SE(t) steel specimen”, Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 9, pp. 1359–1371.

22.

K.H.

Jung

C.K.

Yang

Y.C.

and Han

K.S.

(2004). “Acoustic emission behavior during fatigue crack propagation in 304 stainless steel”, Journal of Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 261–263, pp. 1325–1330.

23.

Ohira

Kishi

and Horiuchi

(1980). “Acoustic emission during fatigue crack propagation in structural materials”, International Acoustic Emission Symposium, Vol. 5, pp. 137–145.

24.

Paris

P.C.

and Erdogan

(1963). “A critical analysis of crack propagation laws”, Journal of Basic Engineering, Vol. 85, No. 4, pp. 528–534.

25.

DiSP User's Manual (2001). Physical Acoustics Corporation, Princeton Junction, NJ, USA.

26.

Association of American Railroads (1999). Procedure for Acoustic Emission Evaluation of Tank Cars and IM101 Tanks, Association of American Railroads, Washington, D.C., USA.

27.

Roberts

and Talebzadeh

(2003), “Acoustic emission monitoring of fatigue crack propagation”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 59, No. 6, pp. 695–712.

28.

Roberts

and Talebzadeh

(2003). “Fatigue life prediction based on crack propagation and acoustic emission count rates”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 59, No. 6, pp. 679–694.

29.

Roy

Fisher

J.W.

and Yen

B.T.

(2003). “Fatigue resistance of welded details enhanced by ultrasonic impact treatment (UIT)”, International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 25, No. 9–11, pp.1239–1247.

30.

Sinclair

A.C.E.

Connors

D.C.

and Formby

C.L.

(1977). “Acoustic emission analysis during fatigue crack growth in steel”, Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 28, pp. 263–273.

31.

Ziehl

Zárate

and Caicedo

(2011). “Prediction of fatigue crack growth in steel bridge components using acoustic emission”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 67, No.8, pp. 1254–1260.

32.

Momeni

Godinez

Giurgiutiu

Ziehl

and Yu

(2012). “Dual mode sensing with low-profile piezoelectric thin wafer sensors for steel bridge crack detection and diagnosis”, Journal of Advances in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2012, No. 155, pp. 1–10.

33.

Ziehl

P.H.

Engelhardt

M.D.

Fowler

T.J.

Ulloa

F.V.

Medlock

R.D.

and Schell

(2009). “Design and field evaluation of hybrid FRP/reinforced concrete superstructure system”, Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 309–318.