Analytical Benchmark Solutions for Steel Frame Structures Subject to Local Buckling Effects

Abstract

Application of “advanced analysis” methods suitable for non-linear analysis and design of steel frame structures permits direct and accurate determination of ultimate system strengths, without resort to simplified elastic methods of analysis and semi-empirical specification equations. However, the application of advanced analysis methods has previously been restricted to steel frames comprising only compact sections that are not influenced by the effects of local buckling. A research project has been conducted with the aim of developing concentrated plasticity methods suitable for practical advanced analysis of steel frame structures comprising non-compact sections. This paper contains a comprehensive set of analytical benchmark solutions for steel frames comprising non-compact sections, which can be used to verify the accuracy of simplified concentrated plasticity methods of advanced analysis. The analytical benchmark solutions were obtained using a distributed plasticity shell finite element model that explicitly accounts for the effects of gradual cross-sectional yielding, longitudinal spread of plasticity, initial geometric imperfections, residual stresses, and local buckling. A brief description and verification of the shell finite element model is provided in this paper.

Keywords

Analytical benchmark solutions steel frame structures non-compact sections

References

Avery

(1998), “Advanced analysis of steel frames comprising non-compact sections”, PhD thesis, School of Civil Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

Avery

and Mahendran

(1998a), “Distributed plasticity analysis of steel frame structures comprising non-compact sections”, Physical Infrastructure Centre Research Monograph 98–2, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, Accepted for publication in Engineering Structures in 1999.

Avery

and Mahendran

(1998b), “Large scale testing of steel frame structures comprising non-compact sections”, Physical Infrastructure Centre Research Monograph 98–1, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, Accepted for publication in Engineering Structures in 1999.

Avery

and Mahendran

(1998c), “Analytical benchmark solutions of steel frame structures comprising non-compact sections”, Physical Infrastructure Centre Research Monograph 98–3, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

ECCS (1984), “Ultimate limit state calculation of sway frames with rigid joints”, Technical Committee 8 — Structural Stability Technical Working Group 8.2 — System, Publication No. 33.

Kanchanalai

(1977), “The design and behaviour of beam-columns in unbraced steel frames”, AISI Project No. 189, Report No. 2, Civil Engineering/Structures Research Laboratory, University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA.

SAA (1990), “AS4100–1990 Steel Structures”, Standards Association of Australia, Sydney, Australia.

Vogel

(1985), “Calibrating frames”, Stahlbau, 54: 295–301.

Ziemian

R.D.

(1993), “Examples of frame studies used to verify advanced methods of inelastic analysis”, Plastic hinge based methods for advanced analysis and design of steel frames, Structural Stability Research Council, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA, pp.217–243.