This paper presents an analytical solution for the evolution and distribution of shear stresses along the entire bond length of FRP-concrete interfaces due to mode-II fatigue loading. The creep-fatigue interaction and fatigue crack growth after debonding initiation are incorporated into a nonlinear interfacial constitutive law. While the creep-fatigue interaction is represented by the degradation of the interfacial stiffness, the debond growth is governed by a form of the Paris equation and the fracture energy ratio, Gmax/Gc. Furthermore, a new form of energy ratio is adopted to be debond-dependent. Through a series of experimental double-lap shear specimens, the results showed that the debond growth rate (da/dN) along the FRP-concrete interfaces diminishes with fatigue cycles and that 30% of the static bond capacity of the FRP-concrete interface can be considered as the endurance limit of fatigue loading for FRP-strengthened beams. The agreement between the theoretical predictions and experimental results is valid, with a good degree of accuracy.
ACI Committee 215 (1992). Consideration for Design Concrete Structure Subjected to Fatigue Loading, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich., 24 pp.
2.
BizindavyiL.NealeK.W. and ErkiM.A. (2003). “Experimental investigation of bonded fiber reinforced polymer-concrete joints under cyclic loading”, Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 127–134.
3.
BreňaF.S.BenouaichM.A. and WoodS.L. (2005). “Fatigue tests of reinforced concrete beams strengthened using carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites”, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 102, No. 2, pp. 305–313.
4.
DiabH. and WuZ. (2007). “Nonlinear constitutive model for time-dependent behavior of FRP-concrete interface”, Composite Science and Technology, Vol. 67, No. 11–12, pp. 2323–2333.
5.
DiabH.WuZ. and IwashitaK. (2007). “Experimental and numerical investigation on the fatigue behavior of FRP-concrete interface”, Proceedings of the FRPRCS-8, Greece, (CD-Rom) 10 pp.
6.
HarriesK. (2005) “Fatigue behaviour of bonded FRP used for flexural retrofit”, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Bond Behaviour of FRP in Structures, Hong Kong, China, pp. 547–552.
7.
HarriesK. and AidooJ. (2005). “Deterioration of FRP-to-concrete bond under fatigue loading”, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Bond Behavior of FRP in Structures (BBFS 2005), Hong Kong, China, pp. 553–558.
8.
HarriesK.AidoJ.ZornA. and QuattlebaumJ. (2006). “Deterioration of FRP-to-concrete bond under failure loading”, Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 779–789.
9.
ImanakaM.HaragaK. and NishikawaT. (1995). “Fatigue strength of adhesive/rivet combined lap joint”. Journal of Adhesion, Vol 49, pp. 197–209.
10.
JSCE-Concrete Engineering Series 41 (2001), Recommendations for Upgrading of Concrete Structures with Use of Continuous Fiber Sheets.
11.
KimY.J. and HeffernanP.J. (2008). “Fatigue behavior of externally strengthened concrete beams with fiber-reinforced polymer: State of the art”, Journal of Composite for Construction, ASCE, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 246–255.
12.
LuX.Z.TengJ.G.YeL.P. and JiangJ.J. (2005). “Bond-slip models for FRP sheets/plates bonded to concrete”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 920–937.
13.
MasoudS.SoudkiK. and TopperT. (2001). “CFRP-strengthened and corroded RC beams under monotonic and fatigue loads”, Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 228–236.
14.
PapakonstantinouC.G.PetrouM.F. and HarriesK.A. (2001). “Fatigue behavior of RC beams strengthened with GFRP sheets”, Composites for Construction, ASCE, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 246–253.
15.
ParisP.C. and ErdoganF. (1963). “A critical analysis of crack propagation laws”, Journal of Basic Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 528–534.
16.
ShahawyM. and BeitelmanT.E. (1999). “Static and fatigue performance of RC beams strengthened with CFRP laminates”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 125, No. 6, pp. 613–621.
17.
TanK.H. (2003). “Effect of cyclic loading on FRP-concrete interface bond strength”, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Latest Achievement of Technology and Research on Retrofitting Concrete structures, Japan Concrete Institute, Japan, pp. 1–8.
18.
WuZ. and DiabH. (2007). “Constitutive model for time-dependent behavior of FRP–concrete interface”, Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, Vol. 11, NO. 5, pp. 477–486.
19.
WuZ. and IwashitaK. (2003). “Fatigue performance of RC beams strengthened with externally prestressed PBO fiber sheets”, Proceedings of the FRPRCS-6, Singapore, pp. 885–894.
20.
WuZ.YuanH. and NiuH., (2002). “Stress transfer and fracture propagation in different kinds of adhesive joints”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 128, No. 5, pp. 562–573.
21.
YuanHTengJ.G.SeracinoR.WuZ.S. and YaoJ. (2004). “Full-range behavior of FRP-to-concrete bonded joints”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 553–565.
22.
YuanH.WuZ. and YoshizawaH. (2001). “Theoretical solutions on interfacial stress transfer of externally bonded steel/composites laminates”, Journal of Structure Mechanics and Earthquake Engineering, JSCE, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 27–39.
23.
ZhangZ.ShangJ.K. and LawrenceF.V.Jr. (1995). “A backface strain technique for detecting fatigue crack initiation in adhesive joints”, Journal of Adhesion, Vol. 49, pp. 23–36.
