The Human-Computer interface is crucial to good design support tools. It has to be non-interruptive and non-distracting, yet allow the architect to interact with the computer software. The physical reality of the interface, such as the shape and manipulability of devices like the mouse, keyboard, joystick, or data-glove, has to be mapped on actions and commands in the software. Already the current user interfaces are felt to be inadequate for a good support of design, and the functionality of design tools is growing, requiring even more and new physical interface devices. In this paper, we present research on new tangible interfaces for architectural design support. In particular, we focus on the research methodological question how to investigate such devices. The research strategy is introduced and discussed, after which concrete implementations of this strategy are shown. Based on this work, we conclude that the combination of interface and the context of its use in terms of design method and user needs form crucial aspects for such research and cannot be considered separately.
References
1.
WilliamsonJ.B.KarpD.A.DalphinJ.R. and GrayP.S., The Research Craft: An Introduction to Social Research Methods, Little, Brown and Company, Boston, 1982.
2.
ShoshkesE., The Design Process, Whitney Library of Design, New York, 1989.
3.
LawsonB., Design in Mind, Butterworth Architecture, Oxford, 1994.
4.
RoozenburgN.F.M. and EekelsJ., Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, 1995.
5.
BaxM.F.ThTheoryDomain, The Scope and Structure of Building Science, Open House International, 1979, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 13–43.
6.
AchtenH.H., Generic Representations – An Approach for Modelling Procedural and Declarative Knowledge of Building Types in Architectural Design, Ph.D.Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, 1997.
7.
CrossN., Developments in Design Methodology, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, 1984.
8.
CrossN.DorstK. and RoozenburgN., eds., Research in Design Thinking: Proceedings of a Workshop Meeting Held at the Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft University Press, Delft, 1992.
9.
AchtenH.H.de VriesB. and HennesseyJ., eds., Design Research in the Netherlands 2000 – Proceedings of the Symposium, Eindhoven May 25–26 2000, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, 2001.
10.
GribnauM.W.VerstijnenI.M., and HennesseyJ. M., Three Dimensional Object Orientation Using the Non-Dominant Hand, in: TimmermansH., ed., Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design and Decision Support Systems, Eindhoven, Eindhoven University of Technology, 1998, [CD-ROM].
11.
KnightM. and BrownA., Working in Virtual Environments Through Appropriate Physical Interfaces, in: BrownA.KnightM. and BerridgeP., eds., Architectural Computing from Turing to 2000, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, 1999, pp. 431–436.
DjajadiningratJ.P.OverbeekeC.J., and StappersP.J., Cubby: A Unified Interaction Space for Precision Manipulation, in: Proceedings of ITEC2001, Lille, 2001, [CD-ROM].
VriesBde AchtenH.H. and CoomansM.K.D., VR-DIS Research Programme – Design Systems Group, in: de VriesB.van LeeuwenJ.P. and AchtenH.H., eds., CAAD Futures 2001 – Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2001, 795–808.
16.
de VriesB.JessurunJ. and DijkstraJ., Conformance Checking by Capturing and Simulating Human Behaviour in the Built Environment, in: TimmermansH. and de VriesB., eds., Design Decision Support Systems in Architecture, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, 378–391.
17.
CoomansM.K.D. and van LeeuwenJ.P., Abstract but Tangible, Complex but Manageable, in: Proceedings of AVOCAAD 2001, Brussels, Belgium, 2001.
18.
TanA. A.W.TimmermansH. J. P. and de VriesB., Using a Virtual Environment for Understanding Real-World Travel Behavior, in: TimmermansH.J.P. and de VriesB., eds., Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Design and Decision Support Systems in Urban Planning, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, 2000, 241–251.
19.
TanA. A. W.TimmermansH. J. P. and de VriesB., Investigation of Human Behavior in a Virtual Environment, in: Proceedings of the VWsim'00 Conference, 2000 Virtual Worlds and Simulation Conference, San Diego, California.
20.
TanA.A.W.TimmermansH.J.P. and de VriesB., Interactive Computer Experiments in Virtual Reality: Issues and Prospects, in: Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 80th Annual Meeting, Washington, 2001 [CD-ROM].
21.
OrzechowskiM.A.TimmermansH.J.P. and de VriesB., Musev2 – The Virtual Reality Application to Collect User Preference Data, in: Proceedings of 5th Iberoamerican Congress Of Digital Graphic Sigradi-2001, 2001, pp. 162–164.
22.
SegersN.M., Towards a Data-Structure That Can Handle Ambiguous Information in a Computer-Aided Tool for the Early Phase of Architectural Design, in: TimmermansH.J.P. and de VriesB., eds., Design Decision Support Systems in Architecture, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, 2002, pp. 339–351.
23.
SegersN.M. and de VriesB., The Idea Space System: Words as Handles to a Comprehensive Data Structure, in: ChiuM.L., eds., Digital Design – Research and Practice. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2003 (forthcoming).
24.
TabakV., and de VriesB., Interactive Urban Design Using Integrated Planning Requirements Control, in: DokonalW., ed., Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (forthcoming), 2003.
25.
MantovaniG. and RivaG., Real Presence: How Different Ontologies Generate Different Criteria for Presence, Telepresence, and Virtual Presence, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1999, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 540–550.
26.
SeoJ. and KimG.J., Design for Presence: A Structured Approach to Virtual Reality System Design, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 2002, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 378–403.
