Numerical Simulations of Liquid-Gas-Solid Three-Phase Flows in Microgravity

Abstract

Three-phase liquid-gas-solid flows under microgravity condition are studied. An Eulerian-Lagrangian computational model was developed and used in the simulations. In this approach, the liquid flow was modeled by a volume-averaged system of governing equations, whereas motions of particles and bubbles were evaluated using the Lagrangian trajectory analysis procedure. It was assumed that the bubbles remained spherical, and their shape variations were neglected. The bubble-liquid, particle-liquid and bubbl-particle two-way interactions were accounted for in the analysis. The discrete phase equations used included drag, lift, buoyancy, and virtual mass forces. Particle-particle interactions and bubble-bubble interactions were accounted for by the hard sphere model. Bubble coalescence was also included in the model. The transient flow characteristics of the three-phase flow were studied; and the effects of gravity, inlet bubble size and g-jitter acceleration on variation of flow characteristics were discussed. The low gravity simulations showed that most bubbles are aggregated in the inlet region. Also, under microgravity condition, bubble transient time is much longer than that in normal gravity. As a result, the Sauter mean bubble diameter, which is proportional to the transient time of the bubble, becomes rather large, reaching to more than 9 mm. The bubble plume in microgravity exhibits a plug type flow behavior. After the bubble plume reaches the free surface, particle volume fraction increases along the height of the column. The particles are mainly located outside the bubble plume, with very few particles being retained in the plume. In contrast to the normal gravity condition, the three phases in the column are poorly mixed under microgravity conditions. The velocities of the three phases were also found to be of the same order. Bubble size significantly affects the characteristics of the three-phase flows under microgravity conditions. For the same inlet bubble number density, the flow with larger bubbles evolves faster. The simulation results showed that the effect of g-jitter acceleration on the gas-liquid-particle three phase flows is small.

Keywords

Three-Phase Gas-Liquid-Particle Numerical Simulation Eulerian-Lagrangian Method Microgravity

References

Borchers

Busch

Sokolichin

and Eigenberger

, 1999. Applicability of the stand k-e turbulence model to the dynamic simulation of bubble, Part II: Comparison of detailed experiments and flow simulations. Chem. Eng. Sci. 54, pp. 5927–5935.

Bourloutski

and Sommerfeld

, Transient Euler/Lagrange calculations of dense gas-liquid-solid flows in bubble column with consideration of phase interaction. 2002. Proceedings 10^th Workshop on Two-Phase Flow Predictions, Merseburg, pp. 113–123.

Cao

J. F.

, and Ahmadi

, 1995. Gas-particle two-phase turbulent flow in a vertical duct. Int. J. Multiphase Flow. 21 (6), pp. 1203–1228.

Cao

J. F.

, and Ahmadi

, 2000. Gas-particle two-phase turbulent flow in horizontal and inclined ducts. Int. J. of Engineering Science 38, pp.1961–1981.

Delnoij

Kuipers

J. A. M.

and van Swaaij

W. P.M.

, 1997a. Dynamic simulation of gas-solid two-phase flow: Effect of column aspect ratio on the flow structure. Chem. Eng. Sci. 52, pp. 3759–3772.

Delnoij

Lammers

F. A.

Kuipers

J. A. M.

and van Swaaij

W. P.M.

, 1997b. Dynamic simulation of dispersed gas-solid two-phase flow using a discrete bubble model. Chem. Eng. Sci. 52, pp. 1399–1562.

Devanathan

Dudukovic

M. P.

Lapin

and Lubbert

, 1995. Chaotic flow in bubble column reactors. Chem. Engng Sci. 50, pp. 2661–2667.

Ding

and Gidaspow

, 1990. A bubbling fluidization model using kinetic theory of granular flow, AICHE J. 36, pp. 523–538.

Fan

Zheng

Yao

and Cen

, 2001. Direct simulation of particle dispersion in a three-dimensional temporal mixing layer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. 457, pp. 2151–2166.

10.

Fan

Luo

Zheng

Jin

and Cen

, 2003. Modulation on coherent vortex structures by dispersed solid particles in a three-dimensional mixing layer. Physical Review E., 68(3), 036309.

11.

Fan

Luo

and Cen

, 2004. Direct numerical simulation of a near-field particle-laden plane turbulent jet. Physical Review E., 70, 026303.

12.

Fan

L.-S.

, 1989. Gas-Liquid-Solid Fluidization Engineering, Butterworths, Boston.

13.

Gamwo

I.K.

Halow

J.S.

Gidaspow

, and Mostofi

, 2003. CFD Models for Methanol Synthesis Three-Phase Reactors: Reactor Optimization, Chemical Engineering Science 93, pp. 103–112.

14.

Gidaspow

Bahary

and Jayaswal

U. K.

, 1994. Hydrodynamic models for gas-liquid-solid fluidization. Numerical Methods in Multiphase Flows, FED 185, ASME, New York, N Y, pp. 117–124.

15.

Grevskott

Sannas

B. H.

Dudukovic

M. P.

Hjarbo

K. W.

and Svendsen

H. F.

, 1996. Liquid circulation, bubble size distributions, and solids movement in two- and three-phase bubble columns, Chem. Eng. Sci. 51, pp. 1703–1713.

16.

Griebel

Dornseifer

and Neunhoeffer

, 1998. Numerical Simulation in Fluid Dynamics: A practical introduction. The Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA.

17.

Harlow

and Welch

, 1965. Numerical calculation of time-dependent viscous incompressible flow of fluid with free surface. Phys. Fluid, 8, pp. 2182–2189.

18.

Hoomans

B. P. B.

Kuipers

J. A. M.

and Briels

W. J.

, 1996. Discrete particle simulation of bubble and slug formation in a two-dimensional gas-fluidized bed: A hard-sphere approach. Chem. Eng. Sci. 51, pp. 99–118.

19.

Kvasnak

and Ahmadi

, 1996. Deposition of ellipsoidal particles in turbulent duct Flows. Chem. Eng. Sci. 51, pp. 5137–5148.

20.

Krishna

Urseanu

M. I.

van Baten

J. M.

, and Ellenberger

, 1999. Influence of scale on the hydrodynamics of bubble columns operating in the churn-turbulent regime: Experiments vs. Eulerian simulations. Chem. Eng. Sci. 54, 4903–4911.

21.

Lain

Broder

and Sommerfeld

, 1999. Experimental and numerical studies of the hydrodynamics in a bubble column. Chem. Eng. Sci. 54, pp. 4913–4920.

22.

Lain

Broder

Sommerfeld

and Goz

M. F.

2002. Modelling hydrodynamics and turbulence in a bubble column using the Euler-Lagrange procedure. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 28, pp. 1381–1407.

23.

Lapin

and Lubbert

, 1994. Numerical simulation of the dynamics of two phase gas-liquid flows in bubble columns. Chem. Eng. Sci. 49, pp. 3661–3684.

24.

Lapin

Paaschen

Junghans

Lubbert

, 2002. Bubble column fluid dynamics, flow structures in slender columns with large-diameter ring-spargers. Chem. Eng. Sci. 57, pp. 1419–1424.

25.

Ahmadi

Bayer

R.G.

and Gaynes

M.A.

, 1994. Aerosols Particle Deposition in an Obstructed Turbulent Duct Flow, J. Aerosol Science, 25, pp. 91–112.

26.

Mansoori

Saffar-Avval

Tabrizi

Basirat H

and Ahmadi

, 2002a. Modeling of Heat Transfer in Turbulent Gas-Solid Flow, International Journal Heat Mass and Transfer, 45, pp. 1173–1184.

27.

Mansoori

Saffar-Avval

Tabrizi

Basirat H.

Ahmadi

, and Lain

, 2002b. Thermo-Mechanical Modeling of Turbulent Heat Transfer in Gas-Solid Flows Including Particle Collisions, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 23, pp. 792–806.

28.

Mitra-Majumdar

Farouk

and Shah

Y. T.

, 1997. Hydrodynamic modeling of three-phase flows through a vertical column. Chem. Eng. Sci. 52, pp. 4485–4497.

29.

Mudde

R. F.

, and Simonin

, 1999. Two- and three-dimensional simulations of a bubble plume using a two-fluid model. Chem. Eng. Sci. 54, pp. 5061–5069.

30.

Padial

N. T.

Vander Heyden

W. B.

Rauenzahn

R. M.

and Yarbo

S. L.

, 2000. Three-Dimensional simulation of a three-phase draft-tube bubble column. Chem. Eng. Sci. 55, 3261–3273.

31.

Patankar

N. A.

and Joseph

D. D.

, 2001a. Modeling and numerical simulation of particulate flows by the Eulerian-Lagrangian approach. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 27, pp. 1659–1684.

32.

Patankar

N. A.

and Joseph

D. D.

, 2001b, Lagrangian numerical simulation of particulate Flows. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 27, pp. 1685–1706.

33.

Pita

J. A.

and Sandaresan

, 1993. Developing flow of a gas-particle mixture in a vertical riser, AICHE J. 39, pp. 541–552.

34.

Sanyal

Vasquez

Roy

, and Dudukovic

M. P.

, 1999. Numerical simulation of gas-liquid dynamics in cylindrical bubble column reactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 54, pp. 5071–5083.

35.

Sokolichin

and Eigenberger

Lapin

Lubert

, 1997. Dynamic numerical simulation of gas-liquid two-phase flows Euler/Euler versus Euler/Lagrange. Chem. Eng. Sci. 52, pp. 611–626.

36.

Trapp

J. A.

and Mortensen

G. A.

, 1993. A discrete particle model for bubble slug two phase flow. J. Comp. Phys. 107, pp. 367–377.

37.

Tsuji

Kawaguchi

and Tanaka

, 1993. Discrete particle simulation of two dimensional fluidized bed. Powder Technol. 77, pp. 79–87.

38.

Webb

Que

and Senior

P. R.

, 1992. Dynamic simulation of gas-liquid dispersion behavior in a 2-D bubble column using a graphics mini-supercomputer. Chem. Eng. Sci. 47, pp. 3305–3312.

39.

Gidaspow

, 2000. Hydrodynamic simulation of methanol synthesis in gas-liquid slurry bubble column reactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 55, pp. 573–587.

40.

Xu, B. H. and Yu, A. B., 1997. Numerical simulation of the gas-solid flow in a fluidized bed by combing discrete particle method with computational fluid dynamics. Chem. Eng. Sci. 52, pp. 2785–2809.

41.

Zhang

J. P.

, 1999. Discrete phase simulation of bubble and particle dynamics in gas-liquid-solid fluidization systems. Ph.D. thesis, The Ohio State University.

42.

Zhang

, 1998, Study of gas-solid multiphase flow characteristics in impact rich/lean burners and curved ducts, Ph.D. dissertation, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P. R. China.

43.

Zhang

and Ahmadi

, 2005. Eulerian-Lagrangian simulations of liquid-gas-solid flows in three-phase slurry reactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 60, pp. 5089–5104.

44.

Zhou

Yang

and Fan

, 2005. A second-order moment three-phase turbulence model for simulating gas-liquid-solid flows. Chem. Eng. Sci. 60, pp. 647–653.