In the past few decades, atmospheric effects on the variation of seepage from soil have been studied in disciplines such as volcanology, environmental protection, safety and health hazard avoidance. Recently, monitoring of potential leakage from the geologic sequestration of carbon has been added to this list. Throughout these diverse fields, barometric pumping and presence of steady winds are the two most commonly investigated atmospheric factors. These two factors have the effect of pumping gas into and out of the unsaturated zone, and sweeping the gas in the porous medium. This study focuses on two new factors related to atmosphere in order to explain the CO2 seepage anomalies observed at the Horseshoe Lake tree kill near Mammoth Mountain, CA, where the temporal variation of seepage due to a storm event could not be explained by the two commonly studied effects. First, the interaction of the lower atmospheric dynamics and the ground topography is considered for its effect on the seepage variation over an area that is linked through high-porosity, high-permeability soils and/or fracture networks. Second, the regional pressure fronts that impose significant pressure oscillation over an area are studied. The comparison of the computer simulation results with the experimental measurements suggests that the seepage anomaly observed at the Horseshoe Lake Tree Kill could be due to the unsteady effects caused by regional pressure fronts.
AelionC.M.ConteB.C., Susceptibility of residential wells to VOC and nitrate contamination, Environmental Science & Technology, 38(6):1648–1653, March, 2004.
2.
AllardP.CarbonelleJ.DajlevicD.Le BronecJ.MorelP.RobeM.C.MaurenasJ.M.Faivre-PierretR.MartinD.SabrouxJ.C.ZettwoogP., Eruptive and diffuse emissions of CO2 from Mount Etna, Nature, Vol. 351, pp. 387–391, May 1991.
3.
BaubronJ.C.AllardP.ToutainJ.P., Diffuse volcanic emissions of carbon dioxide from Vulcano Island Italy, Nature, Vol. 344, pp. 51–53, March, 1990.
4.
BernardoC.de VriesD.F., “Permanent Shallow Subsoil CO2 Flux Chambers for Monitoring of Onshore CO2 geological storage sites”, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 5, pp. 565–570, 2011.
5.
ConenF.SmithK.A., A re-examination of closed flux chamber methods for the measurement of trace gas emissions from soils to the atmosphere, European Journal of Soil Science, Vol. 49, pp. 701–707, December, 1998.
6.
ConnorC.B.ClementB.M.SongX.LaneS.B.West-ThomasJ., Continuous Monitoring of High-Temperature Fumaroles on an Active Lava Dome, Volcan Colima, Mexico: Evidence of Mass Flow Variation in Response to Atmospheric Forcing, J. of Geophy. Res., Vol. 98, No. B11, pp. 19,713–19,722, November, 1993.
7.
CramerC.H.McNuttS.R., Spectral Analysis of Earthquakes in the 1989 Mammoth Mountain Swarm near Long Valley, California, Bullet. Seism. Soc. Am., Vol. 87, No. 6, pp. 1454–1462, December, 1997.
8.
EvansW.C.SoreyM.L.KennedyB.M.StonestromD.A.RogieJ.D.ShusterD.L., High CO2 emissions through porous media: Transport mechanisms and implications for flux measurement and fractionation, Chemical Geology, Vol. 177, pp. 15–29, 2001.
9.
FarrarC.D.SoreyM.L.EvansW.C.HowleJ.F.KerrB.D.KennedyB.M.KingC.-Y.SouthonJ.R., Forest-killing diffuse CO2 emission at Mammoth Mountain as a sign of magmatic unrest, Nature, Vol. 376, pp. 675–677, August, 1995.
10.
GerlachT.M.DoukasM.P.McGeeK.A.KesslerR., Three-year decline of magmatic CO2 emissions from soils of a Mammoth Mountain tree kill: Horseshoe Lake, CA, 1995–1997, Geophy. Res. Lett., Vol. 25, No. 11, pp. 1947–1950, June, 1998.
11.
HillD.P.EllswirthW.L.JohnstonM.J.S.LangbeinJ.O.OppenheimerD.H.PittA.M.ReasenbergP.A.SoreyM.L.McNuttS.R., The 1989 Earthquake Swarm Beneath Mammoth Mountain, California: An Initial Look at the 4 May through 30 September Activity, Bullet. Seism. Soc. Am., Vol. 80, No. 2, pp. 325–339, April, 1990.
12.
HillD.P.PrejeanS., Magmatic unrest beneath Mammoth Mountain, California, J. Vol. Geotherm. Res., Vol.146, pp. 257–283, 2005.
13.
JulianB.R.PittA.M.FoulgerG.R., Seismic image of a CO2 reservoir beneath a seismically active volcano, Geophys. J. Int., Vol. 133, F7–F10, 1998.
14.
LewickiJ.L.HilleyG.E.ToshaT.AoyagiR.YamamotoK.BensonS.M., Dynamic coupling of volcanic CO2 flow and wind at the Horseshoe Lake tree kill, Mammoth Mountain, California, Geophy. Res. Lett., Vol.34, L03401, 2007a.
15.
LewickiJ.L.OldenburgC.M.DobeckL.SpanglerL., Surface CO2 leakage during two shallow subsurface CO2 releases, Geophy. Res. Lett., Vol. 34, L24402, 2007b.
16.
LewickiJ.L.FischerM.L.HilleyG.E., Six-week time series of eddy covariance CO2 flux at Mammoth Mountain, California: Performance evaluation and role of meteorological forcing, J. Vol. Geotherm. Res., Vol. 171, pp. 178–190, 2008.
17.
MassmannJ.FarrierD.F., Effects of Atmospheric Pressures on Gas Transport in the Vadose Zone, Water Resources Res., Vol.28, No. 3, pp. 777–791, March 1992.
18.
McGeeK.A.GerlachT.M., Annual cycle of magmatic CO2 in a tree-kill soil at Mammoth Mountain, California: Implications for soil acidification, Geology, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 463–466, May, 1998.
19.
OgretimE.GrayD.D.BromhalG.S., Effects of Topography Induced Pressure Variation on the Near-Surface Migration of a Potential CO2 Leak, Energy Procedia – GHGT9, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp 2341–2348, February 2009.
RahnT.A.FessendenJ.E.WahlenM., Flux chamber measurements of anomalous CO2 emission from the flanks of Mammoth Mountain, California, Geophy. Res. Lett., Vol. 23, No. 14, pp. 1861–1864, July, 1996.
22.
ReimerG.M., Use of Soil-Gas Helium Concentrations fro Earthquake Prediction: Limitations Imposed by Diurnal Variation, J. of Geophy. Res., Vol. 85, No. B6, pp. 3107–3114, June, 1980.
23.
RitziR.W.Jr.SorooshianS.HsiehP.A., The Estimation of Fluid Flow Properties from the Response of Water Levels in Well to the Combined Atmospheric and Earth Tide Forces, Water Resources Res., Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 883–893, May 1991.
24.
RogieJ.D.KerrickD.M.SoreyM.L.ChiodiniG.GallowayD.L., Dynamics of carbon dioxide emission at Mammoth Mountain, California, Earth & Planetary Sci. Lett., Vol. 188, pp.535–541, 2001.
25.
SoreyM.L.EvansW.C.KennedyB.M.FarrarC.D.HainsworthL.J.HausbackB., Carbon dioxide and helium emissions from a reservoir of magmatic gas beneath Mammoth Mountain, California, J. of Geophy. Res., Vol. 103, No. B7, pp. 15,303–15,323, July, 1998.
26.
StrazisarB.R.WellsA.W.DiehlJ.R.HammackR.W.VeloskiG.A., “Near Surface Monitoring for the ZERT Shallow CO2 Injection Project”, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 3, No. 6, pp. 736–744, December 2009.
27.
ThorstensonD.C.PollockD.W., Gas Transport in Unsaturated Zones: Multicomponent Systems and the Adequacy of Fick's Laws, Water Resources Res., Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 477–507, March, 1989.
28.
ThorstensonD.C.WeeksE.P.HaasH.BusenbergE.PlummerL.N.PetersC.A., Chemistry of unsaturated zone gases sampled in open boreholes at the crest of Yucca Mountain, Nevada: Data and basic concepts of chemical and physical processes in the mountain, Water Resources Res., Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 1507–1529, June 1998.
29.
USGS, EarthExplporer website, http://edcsns17.cr.usgs.gov/NewEarthExplorer/ (accessed 2009). Note that available file formats have changed since this data was originally downloaded; Global Multi-resolution Terrain Elevation Data 2010 (DMTED2010) is the current accepted digital elevation format.
30.
WeeksE.P., Does the wind blow through Yucca Mountain?, Proceedings of Workshop V: Flow and Transport through Unsaturated Fractured Rock – Related to High-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal, pp 43–53, 1993, Jan. 7–10, Tucson, Arizona, 1991.
31.
WoodW.W.PetraitisM.J., Origin and Distribution of Carbon Dioxide in the Unsaturated Zone of the Southern High Plains of Texas, Water Resources Res., Vol. 20, No. 9, pp. 1193–1208, September 1984.
32.
WoodcockA.H., Mountain Breathing Revisited – the Hyperventilation of a Volcano Cinder Cone, Bullet. Ameri. Meteo. Soc., Vol. 68, No. 2, February, 1987.
