Engineering Properties of Geotextile Sand Containers and Their Effect on Hydraulic Stability and Damage Development of Low-Crested / Submerged Structures
Free accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2012
Engineering Properties of Geotextile Sand Containers and Their Effect on Hydraulic Stability and Damage Development of Low-Crested / Submerged Structures
Despite the considerable development of Geotextile Sand Container (GSC) technology, no proper design guidelines are yet available for the design of GSC-structures on a sound scientific base. This on-going research study aims to focus on developing simplified formulae and a computational tool for the design of GSC-structures. The significance of important engineering properties including the type geotextile material, the sand fill ratio, the interface friction, and their influence on the hydraulic stability of GSC-structures will also be evaluated. For this purpose and in order to better understand the effects of these properties on the hydraulic stability of GSC-structures, a series of systematic laboratory experiments were conducted. In this paper some of the most important findings are discussed, including the implications for the design practice.
References
1.
CoghlanI.R.CarleyJ.T.CoxR.J.MarianiA. (2008), “Research and development studies for ELCOMAX ELCOROCK Geotextile Sand Containers”, WRL Technical Report, Water Research Laboratory, Sydney, Australia.
2.
DassanayakeD. and OumeraciH. (2009), “Planned research on the hydraulic stability of Geotextile Sand Containers”, 7. FZK-Kolloquium, pp. 45–49, Hannover, Germany.
3.
DassanayakeD. and OumeraciH. (2012), “Important engineering properties of Geotextile Sand Containers and their effect on the hydraulic stability of GSC-Structures”, Terra et Aqua Journal, Issue127, pp 3–11, International Association of Dredging Companies, The Netherlands.
4.
DassanayakeD.SoysaA.Munith-HadiF. and OumeraciH. (2011), “Hydraulic stability of low-crested GSC-Structures”, Internal report, Leichtweiß-Institute for Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources, Braunschweig, Germany.
5.
Deltrares (2008), “Large scale physical model test on the stability of geocontainers”, by Van SteegP and BretelerKlein M., Deltares report prepared for Delft cluster, Delft, The Netherlands
6.
HeertenG.JacksonA.RestallS. and SaathoffF. (2000), “New developments with mega sand containers of nonwoven needle-puncture geotextile for the construction of coastal structures”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Coastal Engineering, Sydney, Australia.
7.
HornseyW.P.CarleyJ.T.CoghlanI.R. and CoxR.J. (2011), “Geotextile sand container shoreline protection systems: Design and application”, Journal of Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 29, pp. 425–439
8.
HudsonR. (1956), “Laboratory investigation of rubble-mound breakwaters”, Journal of the Waterways and Harbour Division, pp 93–118.
9.
JacksonL.A.CorbettB.A. and RestallS.J. (2006) “Failure Modes and Stability Modelling for Design of Sand Filled Geosynthetic Units In Coastal Structures”, Proceedings of International Conference on Coastal Engineering2006, San Diago, USA.
10.
KrahnT.BlatzJ.AlfaroM. and BathurstR. J. (2007), “Large-scale interface shear testing of sand bag dyke materials”, Geosynthetics International Journal, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 119–126.
11.
LawsonC.R. (2008), “Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering”, Geosynthetics International Journal, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 384–427.
12.
MatsushimaK.AqilU.MohriY. and TatsuokaF. (2008), “Shear strength and deformation characteristics of geosynthetic soil bags stacked horizontal and inclined”, Geosynthetics International Journal, 15, No. 2, pp. 119–135.
13.
MelbyJ. A. (2005), “Damage development on stone-armored breakwaters and revetments”, ERDC/CHL CHETN-III-64, US Army Corps of Engineers, USA.
14.
OumeraciH.HinzM.BleckM. and KortenhausA. (2003), “Sand-filled geotextile containers for shore protection”, COPEDEC VI, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
15.
OumeraciH.GrüneJ.SparboomU.Schmidt-KoppenhagenR. and WangZ. (2007), “Untersuchungen zur Kolkbildung und zum Kolkschutz bei Monopile-Gründungen von Offshore-Windenergieanlagen”, Final research report, Coastal Research Centre (FZK), Hannover, Germany.
16.
OumeraciH. and RecioJ. (2010), “Geotextile Sand Containers for shore protection”, Invited Chapter in Handbook of Coastal and Ocean Engineering, pp. 553–600, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.
17.
PIANC (2011), “The application of geosynthetics in waterfront areas”, PIANC Report No. 113 by MarCom Working Group 113.
18.
RecioJ. (2007), “Hydraulic stability of Geotextile Sand Containers for coastal structures- effect of deformations and stability formulae”, PhD Thesis, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany.
19.
RecioJ. and OumeraciH. (2009), “Processes affecting the hydraulic stability of coastal revetments made of Geotextile Sand Containers”, Coastal Engineering Journal, 56(3), pp. 260–284.
20.
RobinA.C. (2004), “Paper Bag Problem”, Mathematics Today, Bulletin of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications, 40, pp. 104–107.
21.
SaathoffJ.OumeraciH. and RestallS. (2007), “Australian and German experiences on the use of Geotextile Containers”, Geotextiles and Geomembranes Journal, Vol. 25, pp. 251–263, Elsevier.
22.
VidalC.LosadaM.A.MedinaR.MansardE.P.D. and Gomez-PinaG., (1992), “A universal analysis for the stability of both low-crested and submerged breakwaters”. Proceedings of the International Conference on Coastal Engineering, pp. 1679–1692, Venice, Italy.
23.
WilmsM.WahrmundH.StahlmannA.HeitzC. and SchlurmannS. (2011), “Kolkbildung und dimensionierung des Kolkschutzsystems eines OWEA Schwerkraftfundaments”, Hydraulische dodellversuche zum STRABAG Schwerkraftfundament, HTG Kongress2011, pp. 395–404, Germany.
24.
WoutersJ. (1998), “Open Taludbekledingen; Stabiliteit van Geosystems”, Deftt Hydraulics Report H1930, Delft, The Netherlands.
