In this study we examined how a GIS-based viewshed analysis that integrates movement could be used to provide substantial knowledge about the placement of Bronze Age grave cairns along the coast in a study area in Brunlanes, Larvik in South-East Norway. Additionally we studied the significance of digital elevation model quality for the interpretation of the viewshed analysis and for encluding palaeo-environmental changes (uplifting of land) in the analysis. Two sets of viewshed analyses were carried out from seven potential sailing routes based on a 20-metre and one-metre resolution DEM. The results indicate that the grave cairns were placed on the skyline in order to stand out more clearly to observers approaching from the sea, and that the DEM quality is of importance for the interpretation. Taking palaeo-environmental issues into consideration, we found that the effects of the uplifting of land were proven to affect visibility whereas vegetation was not an obstacle.
DoneusM.BrieseC., Airborne laser scanning in forested areas -potential and limitations of an archaeological prospection technique, In Remote sensing for archaeological heritage management, CowleyD.C., Editor Europae Archaeologia Consilium (EAC), Brussels, 2011, p. 59–76.
2.
RisbølO., Cultivating the “wilderness” - how lidar can improve archaeological landscape understanding, in Interpreting archaeological topography. 3D data, visualisation and observation, OpitzR.S.CowleyD.C., editors, Oxbow Books, Oxford, 2013, p. 51–62.
3.
CampanaS., 3D Recording and Total Archaeology: From Landscapes to Historical Buildings, International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era, 1, 3, 2012, p. 443–460.
4.
DoneusM.KüchteiberT., Airborne laser scanning and archaeological interpretations - bringing back to people, in Interpreting archaeological topography: Airborne laser scanning, 3D data and ground observation, OpitzR.S.CowleyD.C., editors, Oxbow Books, Oxford, 2013, p. 32–50.
5.
DavidB.ThomasJ., Landscape archaeology: Introduction, In Handbook of landscape archaeology, DavidB.ThomasJ., editors, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, 2010, p. 27–43.
6.
AllenK.M.S., Interpreting space: GIS and archaeology, Taylor & Francis, London, 1990, 1–398.
7.
KvammeK.L., The fundamental principles and practice of predictive modeling, In Mathematics and information science in archaeology: A flexible framework,VoorripsA., Editor Holos-Verlag, Bonn, 1990, p. 257–295.
8.
HarrisT.M.LockG., Toward an evaluation of GIS in European archaeology: The past, present and future of theory and applications, in Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, LockG.StančičZ., editors, Taylor & Francis, London, 1995, p. 349–365.
9.
WheatleyD., Going over old ground: GIS, archaeological theory and the act of perception, In Computing the past: Computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology. CAA92, AndressenJ.MadsenT.ScollarI., editors, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, 1993, p. 133–138.
10.
LloberaM., Understanding movement: A pilot model towards the sociology of movement, in Beyond the Map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies, LockG., editor, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2000, p. 65–84.
11.
LockG.R., Using computers in archaeology: Towards virtual pastsLondon, Routledge, 2003, XV, 300 s.
12.
WheatleyD.GillingsM., Spatial technology and archaeology: The archaeological applications of GIS, Taylor & Francis, London, 2002, XIII, 269 s.
13.
GaffneyV.StančičZ., GIS approaches to regional analysis: A case study of the island of HvarLjubljana, Znanstveni institut Filozofske fakultete, 1991, 1–100.
14.
WheatleyD.GillingsM., Vision, perception and GIS: Developing enriched approaches to the study of archaeological visibility, In Beyond the map: Archaeology and spatial technologies, LockG., editor, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2000, p. 1–27.
15.
TschanA.P.RαcheckczkowskiW.LatałowaM., Perception and viewsheds: Are they mutually inclusive?, in Beyond the map: Archaeology and spatial technologies, LockG., editor, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2000, p. 28–48.
16.
GeareyB.R.ChapmanH.P., “Digital gardening” An approach to simulating elements of palaeovegetation and some implications for the interpretation of prehistoric sites and landscapes, In Digital archaeology. Bridging method and theory, EvansT.L.DalyP., editors, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London and New York, 2006, p. 171–190.
17.
GillingsM.WheatleyD., Seeing is not believing: Unresolved issues in archaeological visibility analysis, in On the good use of GIS, SlapsackB., editor, Brussels, 2001.
18.
DavisS., Lidar survey in the Brú na Bóinne World Heritage Site, in Interpreting archaeological topography. 3D data, visualisation and observation, OpitzR.S.CowleyD.C., editors, Oxbow Books, Oxford, 2013, p. 223–237.
19.
BellT.LockG., Topographic and cultural influences on walking the Ridgeway in later prehistoric times, in Beyond the Map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies, LockG., editor, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2000, p. 85–100.
20.
HarrisT., Moving GIS: Exploring movement within prehistoric cultural landscapes using GIS, in Beyond the Map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies, LockG., editor, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2000, p. 116–123.
21.
ConollyJ.LakeM., Geographical information systems in archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006, XX, 338 s.
22.
van LeusenP.M., Pattern to process. Methodological investigations into the formation and interpretation of spatial patterns in the archaeological landscape, Groningen, 2002, 1–348.
23.
FisherP.F., Extending the Applicability of Viewsheds in Landscape Planning, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 62, 11, 1996, p. 1297–1302.
24.
ThomasJ., Archaeologies of place and landscape, in Archaeological theory today, HodderI., editor, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2012 [2001], p. 167–187.
25.
FraserS.M., The public forum and the space between: The materiality of social strategy in the Irish Neolithic, in Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 1998, Prehistoric Society.
26.
HamiltonS., Phenomenology in practice: Towards a methodology for a “subjective” approach, European Journal of Archaeology, 9, 2006, p. 31–71.
27.
BrückJ., Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory, Archaeological Dialogues, 12, 1, 2005, p. 45–72.
28.
FlemingA., Post-processual landscape archaeology: A critique, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 16, 3, 2006, p. 267.
29.
JerpåsenG.B., Application of Visual Archaeological Landscape Analysis: Some Results, Norwegian Archaeological Review, 42, 2, 2009, p. 123–145.
30.
SolliB., Comments on Gro B. Jerpåsen: “Application of Visual Archaeological Analysis: Some Results”(Norwegian Archaeological Review42 (1) 2009), Norwegian Archaeological Review, 43, 1, 2010, p. 63–76.
31.
SollundM.-L.B., Åsrøyser – gravminner fra bronsealderen. En analyse av åsrøysene fra Vestfold. Varia.Vol. 34, Oslo, Universitetets Oldsaksamling, 1996, 1–116.
32.
HenningsmoenK., En karbon-datert strandforskyvningskurve fra søndre Vestfold, in Fortiden i søkelyset. 14C datering gjennom 25 årLaboratoriet for Radiologisk Datering, Trondheim, 1979, p. 239–247.
33.
BourgeoisQ., Monuments of the horizon. The formation of the barrow landscape throughout the 3rd and 2nd millennium BCSidestone Press, Leiden, 2013.
34.
LøvschalM., Ways of wandering. In the late Bronze Age barrow landscape of the Himmerland-area, Denmark, in Beyond Barrows. Current research on the structuration and perception of the prehistoric landscape through monuments, FontijnD., Editors, Sidestone Press, Leiden, 2013, p. 225–250.
35.
RudebeckE., Vägar, vägkorsningar och vadställen – liminala platser och arkeologi, in Kommunikation i tid och rom, LarssonL., Editor University of Lund, Lund, 2001.
36.
LloberaM.Fábrega-ÁlvarezP.Parcero-OubinaC., Order in movement: A GIS approach to accessibility, Journal of Archaeological Science, 38, 2011, p. 843–851.
37.
TuovinenT., The burial cairns and the landscape in the archipelago of Åboland, SW Finland, in the Bronze Age and the Iron Age, in Faculty of Humanities, University of Oulu, Oulu, 2002.
38.
HagemanJ.B.BennettD.A., Construction of Digital Elevation Models for archaeological applications, in Practical applications of GIS for archaeologists. A predictive modeling kit, WestcottK.L.BrandonR.J., editors, Taylor & Francis, London, 2000, p. 121–136.
