Compliance from Self-Reported versus Pharmacy Claims Data with Metered-Dose Inhalers

Abstract

Spanish

French

OBJECTIVE:

To determine how well self-reported compliance with metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) agrees with compliance determined from pharmacy claims data. Additional analyses were conducted to establish psychometric properties of the questionnaire.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional survey was performed of all adult enrollees with asthma of a managed care organization. The overall return rate was 63.4% (696/1098). Patients with persistent asthma and at least one prescription claim for a controller MDI during the four months preceding the survey were included. Pharmacy claims data were used to calculate a compliance ratio. Self-reported compliance was based on a four-item questionnaire. The primary end points were the percent-agreement and the overall correlation between the two measures. The questionnaire's internal reliability and construct validity were assessed using Cronbach's α and Pearson's correlations, respectively. Mean item response scores for compliant patients were compared with scores of noncompliant patients using the Student's t-test.

RESULTS:

One hundred questionnaire respondents met the study criteria. The mean ± SD compliance ratio was 0.52 ± 0.27, the mean ± SD self-reported compliance score was 4.07 ± 1.0. The overall percent agreement and correlation between self-reported compliance score and the compliance ratio were 75.5% and r = 0.348 (p = 0.01), respectively. The percent agreement was highest (85%) when noncompliant patients (by compliance ratio <0.8) reported being noncompliant (questionnaire score <5). Cronbach's α was 0.86.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study demonstrated a moderate correlation between self-reported asthma compliance and the compliance ratio determined using claims data. The questionnaire may be useful as a screening tool to detect noncompliant behavior in populations or individual patients with asthma.

Keywords

asthma compliance metered-dose inhalers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Haynes

Taylor

Sackett

, eds. Compliance in health care. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979.

Bender

Milgrom

. Compliance with asthma therapy: A case for shared responsibility. J Asthma 1996; 33: 199–202.

Cochrane

Bala

Downs

Mauskopf

Ben-Joseph

. Inhaled corticosteroids for asthma therapy: Patient compliance, devices, and inhalation technique. Chest 2000; 117: 542–50.

Brooks

Richards

Kohler

Soong

Martin

Windsor

. Assessing adherence to asthma medication and inhaler regimens: A psychometric analysis of adult self-report scales. Med Care 1994; 32: 298–307.

Haynes

Taylor

Sackett

Gibson

Bernholz

Mukherjee

. Can simple clinical measurements detect patient noncompliance? Hypertension 1980;2: 757–64.

Rand

Wise

. Measuring adherence to asthma medication regimens. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994; 149 (2 pt 2):S69–76.

Steiner

Prochazka

. The assessment of refill compliance using pharmacy records: Methods, validity, and applications. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50: 105–16.

Steiner

Koepsell

Fihn

Inui

. A general method of compliance assessment using centralized pharmacy records: Description and validation. Med Care 1988; 26: 814–23.

Hamilton

Briceland

. Use of prescription-refill records to assess patient compliance. Am J Hosp Pharm 1992; 49: 1691–6.

10.

Tamblyn

Lavoie

Petrella

Monette

. The use of prescription claims databases in pharmacoepidemiological research: The accuracy and comprehensiveness of the prescription claims database in Quebec. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48: 999–1009.

11.

Kirking

Ammann

Harrington

. Comparison of medical records and prescription claims files in documenting prescription medication therapy. J Pharmacoepidemiol 1996; 5: 3–15.

12.

Choo

Rand

Inui

Lee

Cain

Cordeiro-Breault

. Validation of patient reports, automated pharmacy records, and pill counts with electronic monitoring of adherence to antihypertensive therapy. Med Care 1999; 37: 846–57.

13.

Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda, MD: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Asthma Education and Prevention Program, Expert Panel Report 2; 1997. US Department of Health and Human Services publication No. 97–4051A.

14.

Cronbach

. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297.

15.

Nunnally

Jr.

Introduction to psychological measurement. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.

16.

Streiner

Norman

. Health measurement scales. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford Medical Publications, 1995: 65.

17.

Hyland

Finnis

Irvine

. A scale for assessing quality of life in adult asthma sufferers. J Psychomet Res 1991; 35: 99–110.