SchentagJJMeagherAKForrestA. Fluoroquinolone AUIC break points and the link to bacterial killing rates. Part l: in vitro and animal models. Ann Pharmacother2003; 37: 1287–98. DOI 10.1345/aph.1C199
2.
HooperDC. Mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance. Drug Resist Update1999; 2: 38–55.
3.
BagelSHullenVWiedemannBHeisigP. Impact of gyrA and parC mutations on quinolone resistance, doubling time, and supercoiling degree of Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother1999; 43: 868–75.
4.
InceDHooperDC. Mechanisms and frequency of resistance to gatifloxacin in comparison to AM-1121 and ciprofloxacin in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother2001; 45: 2755–64.
5.
GootzTDZaniewskiRPHaskellSLKaczmarekFSMauriceAE. Activities of trovafloxacin compared with those of other fluoroquinolones against purified topoisomerases and grlA and gyrA mutants of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother1999; 43: 1845–55.
6.
NgEYTrucksisMHooperDC. Quinolone resistance mutations in topoisomerase IV: relationship to the flqA locus and genetic evidence that topoisomerase IV is the primary target and DNA gyrase is the secondary target of fluoroquinolones in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother1996; 40: 1881–8.
7.
AnderssonDILevinBR. The biological costs of antibiotic resistance. Curr Opinion Microbiol1999; 2: 489–93.
8.
LipsitchMLevinBR. The population dynamics of antimicrobial chemotherapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother1997; 41: 363–73.
MoutonJWDudleyMNCarsODerendorfHDrusanoGL. Standardization of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (pk/pd) terminology for anti-infective drugs. Int J Antimicrob Agents2002; 19: 355–8.
11.
PickerillKEPaladinoJASchentagJJ. Comparison of the fluoroquinolones based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. Pharmacotherapy2000; 20: 417–28.
12.
ZhanelGGWaltersMLaingNHobenDJ. In-vitro pharmacodynamic modeling simulating free serum concentrations of fluoroquinolones against multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother2001; 47: 435–40.