Urinary-Based Ovulation and Pregnancy: Point-of-Care Testing

Abstract

German

French

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature concerning ovulation prediction devices and pregnancy detection tests for home use.

DATA SOURCES

Articles were identified through searches of the MEDLINE (1966–May 2003), EMBASE (1980–May 2003), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970–May 2003) databases using the key words ovulation, ovulation detection, pregnancy test, diagnostic reagent kit, and diagnostic test. Additional references were located through review of the bibliographies of the articles found in the literature search. Searches were not limited by time restriction, language, or use of human or animal subjects.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Review articles, textbook chapters, and experimental and observational studies on home use ovulation and pregnancy tests were selected.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Luteinizing hormone (LH)-based ovulation tests have demonstrated accurate and superior ovulation detection when compared to basal body temperature charting, calendar calculation, salivary ferning, or observation of vaginal or cervical discharge changes. Systems using LH and estrone-3-glucuronide (E3G) have also demonstrated accurate detection of the fertile period. Literature evaluating home use of pregnancy tests has demonstrated accurate use by lay persons.

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary-based ovulation prediction and pregnancy detection tests available for use by nonprofessionals enable women and couples to take an active role in the family planning process. Numerous products are available at reasonable costs to the consumer.

Keywords

diagnostic kit ovulation prediction pregnancy test

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Pal

Home test market reaches $1.4 billion. US Pharmacist 1998;23(3). www.uspharmacist.com (accessed 2003 Mar 26).

2. Lipsitz

Pregnancy tests. Sci Am 2000;283:110–1.

3. Quattrocchi

Hove

Ovulation & pregnancy: home testing products. US Pharmacist 1998;23(9). www.uspharmacist.com (accessed 2003 Mar 24).

4. Rosenthal

Briggs

GC.

Home testing and monitoring devices. In: Berardi

DeSimone

Newton

Oszko

Popovich

Rollins

, eds. Handbook of nonprescription drugs. 13th ed. Washington, DC: RR Donnelley and Sons, 2002:1017–48.

5. Spieler

Collins

WP.

Potential fertility—defining the window of opportunity. J Int Med Res 2001;29(suppl 1):3A–13A.

6. Lieu

Yoshida

Infertility. In: Dipiro

Talbert

Yee

Matzke

Well

Posey

, eds. Pharmacotherapy: a pathophysiologic approach. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002:1431–43.

7. Parker

Schimmer

BP.

Pituitary hormones and their hypothalamic releasing factors. In: Hardman

Limbird

, eds. Goodman & Gilman's the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001:1541–62.

8. Lee-Lewandrowski

Lewandrowski

Selected topics in point-of-care testing: Urinalysis, pregnancy testing, microbiology, fecal occult blood, and other tests. Clin Lab Med 2001;21:389–404.

9. Wilcox

Baird

Dunson

McChesney

Weinberg

CR.

Natural limits of pregnancy testing in relation to the expected menstrual period. JAMA 2001;286:1759–61.

10.

10. When the test really counts. Part two: the fertility window. Consum Rep 2003;68(2):48–50.

11.

11. Argo

Nykamp

Unterwagner

WL.

Home diagnostics on the shelf and in the future. US Pharmacist 2002;27(4):36–51.

12.

12. Pregnancy tests. The National Women's Health Information Center. www.4woman.gov/faq/pregtest.htm (accessed 2003 Mar 24).

13.

13. When the test really counts. Part one: earliest pregnancy detection. Consum Rep 2003;68(2):45–7.

14.

14. Home pregnancy test hCG levels and FAQ. FertilityPlus. www.fertilityplus.org/faq/hpt.html (accessed 2003 Mar 24).

15.

15. Butler

Khanlian

Cole

LA.

Detection of early pregnancy forms of human chorionic gonadotropin by home pregnancy test devices. Clin Chem 2001;47:2131–6.

16.

16. Gudgeon

Leader

Howard

Evaluation of the accuracy of the home ovulation detection kit, ClearPlan, at predicting ovulation. Med J Aust 1990;152:344–9.

17.

17. Guida

Tommaselli

Palomba

Pellicano

Moccia

Di Carlo

Efficacy of methods for determining ovulation in a natural family planning program. Fertil Steril 1999;72:900–4.

18.

18. Guermandi

Vegetti

Bianchi

Uglietti

Ragni

Crosignani

Reliability of ovulation tests in infertile women. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:92–6.

19.

19. Behre

Kuhlage

Gabner

Sonntag

Schem

Schneider

HPG

Prediction of ovulation by urinary hormone measurements with the home use ClearPlan Fertility Monitor: comparison with transvaginal ultrasound scans and serum hormone measurements. Hum Reprod 2000;15:2478–82.

20.

20. Behre

HM.

Trial protocol and sample result of a study comparing the ClearPlan Easy Fertility Monitor with serum hormone and vaginal ultrasound measurements in the determination of ovulation. J Int Med Res 2001;29(suppl 1):21A–7A.

21.

21. Tanabe

Susumu

Hand

Nishii

Ishikawa

Nozawa

Prediction of the potentially fertile period by urinary hormone measurements using a new home-use monitor: comparison with laboratory hormone analyses. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1619–24.

22.

22. Guidance for over the counter human chorionic gonadotropin 510(k)s. Food and Drug Administration. www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/guidance/1172.html (accessed 2003 Apr 10).

23.

23. Hanlon

Caiola

Muhlbaier

Dennis

Edelman

Dingfelder

JR.

An evaluation of the sensitivity of five home pregnancy tests to known concentrations of human chorionic gonadotropin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:778–82.

24.

24. Doshi

ML.

Accuracy of consumer performed in-home tests for early pregnancy detection. Am J Public Health 1986;76:512–4.

25.

25. Asch

Asch

Bray

Rojas

FJ.

Performance and sensitivity of modern home pregnancy tests. Int J Fertil 1988;33:154–61.

26.

26. Daviaud

Fournet

Ballongue

Guillem

Leblanc

Casellas

Reliability and feasibility of pregnancy home-use tests: laboratory validation and diagnostic evaluation by 638 volunteers. Clin Chem 1993;39:53–9.

27.

27. Hicks

Iosefsohn

Reliability of home pregnancy-test kits in the hands of laypersons. N Engl J Med 1989;320:320–1.

28.

28. Bastian

Nanda

Hasselblad

Simel

DL.

Diagnostic efficiency of home pregnancy test kits: a meta-analysis. Arch Fam Med 1998;7:465–9.

29.

29. Stanford

White

Hatasaka

Timing intercourse to achieve pregnancy: current evidence. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:1333–41.

30.

30. Severy

LJ.

Acceptability of home monitoring as an aid to conception. J Int Natl Res 2001;29(suppl 1):28A–34A.