Comparison of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Cockcroft–Gault Equations for Antimicrobial Dosage Adjustments

Abstract

Spanish

French

Background:

Direct measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is considered to be the most accurate method of assessing kidney function, albeit difficult and costly. With the derivation of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation to estimate GFR in patients with chronic kidney disease, questions exist as to whether this method should be preferred over the Cockcroft–Gault (CG) equation when making dosage adjustments for renally eliminated antimicrobials.

Objective:

To determine whether a difference exists when making antimicrobial dosage adjustments in patients with chronic kidney disease based on estimation of GFR using the MDRD and CG equations.

Methods:

We conducted an observational analysis of 409 patients with chronic kidney disease who were admitted to a tertiary care facility with an inpatient dialysis center and nephrology unit. GFR was calculated using both the 4- or 6-variable MDRD equation and the CG equation and compared using correlation and Bland–Altman methodology. Dosage discordance rates of the selected antimicrobials were determined on the basis of manufacturer renal dose recommendations.

Results:

Average ± SD GFR for all patients using the CG equation was 34.8 ± 12 mL/min and, using the MDRD equation, was 40.2 ± 12 mL/min (absolute mean difference 5.40; 95% CI 4.66 to 6.15; p < 0.001). The correlation coefficient between the 2 estimations, among all patients, was excellent (r=0.80). The Bland–Altman plot yielded limits of agreement of -9.8 and 20.6; thus, the MDRD estimation may range from 9.8 mL/min below to 20.6 mL/min above the CG estimation for 95% of the cases. A discordance rate of 21–37% (p < 0.001) existed among the recommended dosing adjustments of the selected antimicrobials.

Conclusions:

This analysis demonstrated statistically significant differences between the CG and MDRD equations, resulting in different dosing recommendations in 21–37% of patients. The clinical significance of these differences is uncertain in the absence of data regarding clinical outcomes that would result from the use of the discordant doses.

Keywords

Cockcroft–Gault dosing Modification of Diet in Renal Disease renal

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Coresh

Astor

Greene

Eknoyan

Levey

. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and decreased kidney function in the adult US population: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Kidney Dis 2003;41:1–12.

Collins

Kasiske

Herzog

. Excerpts from the United States Renal Data System 2003 Annual Data Report: atlas of end-stage renal disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2003;42(6 suppl 5):A5–7.

Hoyert

Kung

Smith

. Deaths: preliminary data for 2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2005;53(15):1–48.

K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39(2 suppl 1):S1–266.

Slikensen

Kasiske

. Laboratory assessment of kidney disease: clearance, urinalysis, and kidney biopsy. In: Brenner

Levine

, eds. Brenner & Rector's: the kidney. 7th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2004: 1107–19.

Levey

Bosch

Lewis

Greene

Rogers

Roth

. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:461–70.

Cockcroft

Gault

. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976;16:31–41.

Manjunath

Sarnak

Levey

. Estimating the glomerular filtration rate. Dos and don'ts for assessing kidney function. Postgrad Med 2001;110:55–62.

Jamerson

. Preventing chronic kidney disease in special populations. Am J Hypertens 2005;18(4 pt 2):106S–11S.

10.

DuBois

. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Med 1916;17:863–71.

11.

Lacy

Armstrong

Goldman

Lance

. Drug information handbook. 13th ed. Hudson, OH: Lexi Comp, 2005.

12.

Bland

Altman

. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10.

13.

Bland

Altman

. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:85–93.

14.

Cirillo

Anastasio

De Santo

. Relationship of gender, age, and body mass index to errors in predicted kidney function. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005;20:1791–8.