Clinical Decision Support Tools: Personal Digital Assistant versus Online Dietary Supplement Databases

Abstract

Spanish

French

Background:

Clinical decision support tools (CDSTs) on personal digital assistants (PDAs) and online databases assist healthcare practitioners who make decisions about dietary supplements.

Objective:

To assess and compare the content of PDA dietary supplement databases and their online counterparts used as CDSTs.

Methods:

A total of 102 question-and-answer pairs were developed within 10 weighted categories of the most clinically relevant aspects of dietary supplement therapy. PDA versions of AltMedDex. Lexi-Natural, Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database, and Natural Standard and their online counterparts were assessed by scope (percent of correct answers present), completeness (3-point scale), ease of use, and a composite score integrating all 3 criteria. Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics, including a χ² test, Scheffé's multiple comparison test, McNemar's test, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test were used to analyze data.

Results:

The scope scores for PDA databases were: Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database 84.3%, Natural Standard 58.8%, Lexi-Natural 50.0%, and AltMedDex 36.3%, with Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database statistically superior (p < 0.01). Completeness scores were; Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database 78.4%, Natural Standard 51.0%, Lexi-Natural 43.5%, and AltMedDex 29.7%. Lexi-Natural was superior in ease of use (p < 0.01). Composite scores for PDA databases were: Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database 79.3, Natural Standard 53.0, Lexi-Natural 48.0, and AltMedDex 32.5, with Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database superior (p < 0.01). There was no difference between the scope for PDA and online database pairs with Lexi-Natural (50.0% and 53.9%, respectively) or Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database (84.3% and 84.3%, respectively) (p > 0.05), whereas differences existed for AltMedDex (36.3% vs 74.5%, respectively) and Natural Standard (50.8% vs 80.4%, respectively) (p < 0.01). For composite scores, AltMedDex and Natural Standard online were better than their PDA counterparts (p < 0.01).

Conclusions:

Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database achieved significantly higher scope, completeness, and composite scores compared with other dietary supplement PDA CDSTs in this study. There was no difference between the PDA and online databases for Lexi-Natural and Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database, whereas online versions of AltMedDex and Natural Standard were significantly better than their PDA counterparts.

Keywords

complementary and alternative medicine clinical decision support dietary supplements drug information databases personal digital assistants

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gawande

, Bates

. The use of information technology in improving medical performance. Part II. Physician-support tools. MedGenMed 2000; 2:E13.

Bates

. The quality case for information technology in healthcare. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2002; 2: 7.

Kuperman

, Reichley

, Bailey

. Using commercial knowledge bases for clinical decision support: opportunities, hurdles, and recommendations. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13: 369–71.

Dee

, Teolis

, Todd

. Physicians' use of the personal digital assistant (PDA) in clinical decision making. J Med Libr Assoc 2005; 93: 480–6.

Pestotnik

. Expert clinical decision support systems to enhance antimicrobial stewardship programs. Pharmacotherapy 2005; 25: 1116–25.

Kwan

, Hirschkorn

, Boon

US and Canadian pharmacists' attitudes, knowledge, and professional practice behaviors toward dietary supplements: a systematic review. BMC Complement Altern Med 2006; 6: 31.

Kemper

, Amata-Kynvi

, Dvorkin

Herbs and other dietary supplements: healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Altern Ther Health Med 2003; 9: 42–9.

Clement

, Williams

, Khan

A gap between acceptance and knowledge of herbal remedies by physicians: the need for educational intervention. BMC Complement Altern Med 2005; 5: 20.

Kemper

, Gardiner

, Gobble

, Woods

Expertise about herbs and dietary supplements among diverse health professionals. BMC Complement Altern Med 2006; 6: 15.

10.

Kupferberg

, Hartel

. Herbal databases for PDAs: advice from two librarians. J Electronic Res Med Libr 2004; 1: 43–55.

11.

Hoffecker

, Reiter

. A review of seven complementary and alternative medicine databases. J Electronic Res Med Libr 2006; 4: 13–31.

12.

Clauson

, Peak

, Marsh

, DiScala

, Bellinger

. Clinical decision support tools: focus on dietary supplement databases. Altern Ther Health Med 2008; 14: 36–40.

13.

Fischer

, Crowell

, Curtis

Complementary and alternative medical reference software for personal digital assistants: evidence of clinical applicability. Complementary Health Practice Review 2005; 10: 57–72.

14.

Sweet

, Gay

, Leady

, Stumpf

. Usefulness of herbal and dietary supplement references. Ann Pharmacother 2003; 37:494–9. DOI 10.1345/aph.1C046

15.

Walker

. Evaluation of the ability of seven herbal resources to answer questions about herbal products asked in drug information centers. Pharmacotherapy 2002; 22: 1611–5.

16.

Clauson

, Polen

, Marsh

. Clinical decision support tools: performance of personal digital assistant versus online drug information databases. Pharmacotherapy 2007; 27: 1651–8.