Investigative Interviewers' Perceptions of Their Difficulty in Adhering to Open-Ended Questions with Child Witnesses

Abstract

Best practice guidelines for conducting investigative interviews of children emphasise the importance of obtaining free narrative accounts with the use of open-ended questions. However, research indicates that most investigative interviewers underutilise open-ended questions, even following intensive training in their use. The aim of the current study was to explore investigative interviewers' perceptions of their difficulty in asking open-ended questions. During a training course on how to use open-ended questions, eight child abuse investigators were individually interviewed about why they had asked specific questions in a 10-minute mock interview conducted immediately earlier with a school child. Overall, three reasons were identified. These related to: 1. the specificity of the information required from children; 2. the unfamiliar nature of the open-ended discourse style; and 3. the complex distinction between open-ended versus specific questions. Each of these themes is discussed, along with the implications for trainers and researchers in child investigative interviewing.

Keywords

training questioning child witnesses interviewing techniques vulnerable witnesses

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cacioppo

J. T.

Petty

R. E.

(1981). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought-listing technique. In Merluzzi

T. V.

Glass

C. R.

Genest

(Eds.), Cognitive Assessment (pp. 309–342). New York: The Guilford Press.

Davies

Wilson

(1997). Implementation of the Memorandum: An overview. In Westcott

Jones

(Eds.), Perspectives on the Memorandum: Policy, practice and research in investigative interviewing (pp. 1–12). Aldershot, England: Arena Publishers.

Dey

(1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.

Fisher

R. P.

(1995). Interviewing victims and witnesses of crime. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1(4), 732–764.

Fisher

R. P.

Geiselman

R. E.

Raymond

D. S.

(1987). Critical analysis of police interview techniques. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15(3), 177–185.

Gifford

(1998). Analysis of non-numerical research. In Kerr

Taylor

Heard

(Eds.), Handbook of public health methods (pp. 543–554). New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Lamb

M. E.

Sternberg

K. J.

Orbach

Esplin

P. W.

Mitchell

(2002a). Is ongoing feedback necessary to maintain the quality of investigative interviews with allegedly abused children? Applied Developmental Science, 6(1), 35–41.

Lamb

M. E.

Sternberg

K. J.

Orbach

Hershkowitz

Horowitz

Esplin

P. W.

(2002b). The effects of intensive training and ongoing supervision on the quality of investigative interviews with alleged sex abuse victims. Applied Developmental Science, 6(3), 114–125.

Lipton

J. P.

(1977). On the psychology of eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 90–93.

10.

McGeoch

J. A.

(1947). The psychology of human learning: An introduction. New York: Longmans, Green and Co.

11.

Milne

Bull

(1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Chichester: Wiley.

12.

Orbach

Hershkowitz

Lamb

M. E.

Sternberg

K. J.

Esplin

P. W.

Horowitz

(2000). Assessing the value of structured protocols for forensic interviews of alleged child abuse victims. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(6), 733–752.

13.

Poole

D. A.

Lamb

M. E.

(1998). Investigative interviews of children: A guide for helping professionals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

14.

Powell

M. B.

(2000). PRIDE: The essential elements of a forensic interview with an aboriginal person. Australian Psychologist, 35(3), 186–192.

15.

Powell

M. B.

(2002). Specialist training in investigative and evidential interviewing: Is it having any effect on the behaviour of professionals in the field? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 9(1), 44–55.

16.

Powell

M. B.

Fisher

R. P.

Wright

(2005). Investigative interviewing. In Brewer

Williams

(Eds.), Psychology and law: An empirical perspective (pp. 11–42). New York: Guilford.

17.

Roberts

K. P.

Powell

M. B.

(2001). Describing individual incidents of sexual abuse: A review of research on the effects of multiple sources of information on children's reports. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25(12), 1643–1659.

18.

Sternberg

K. J.

Lamb

M. E.

Davies

G. M.

Westcott

H. L.

(2001). The Memorandum of Good Practice: Theory versus application. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25, 669–681.

19.

Sternberg

K. J.

Lamb

M. E.

Orbach

Esplin

P. W.

Mitchell

(2001). Use of a structured investigative protocol enhances young children's responses to free-recall prompts in the course of forensic interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 997–1005.

20.

Warren

A. R.

Woodall

C. E.

Thomas

Nunno

Keeney

J. M.

Larson

S. M.

(1999). Assessing the effectiveness of a training program of interviewing child witnesses. Applied Developmental Science, 3(2), 128–135.

21.

Wilson

C. J.

Powell

M. B.

(2001). A guide to interviewing children: Essential skills for counsellors, police, lawyers and social workers. Crows Nest, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.