This research concerns crime victims' experiences of Swedish police interviews and their inclination to provide or omit information in such interviews. A group of rape or aggravated assault victims, consisting of 178 women and men, answered a questionnaire in this explorative study, which revealed that police officer behaviour in interviews was mainly calm and obliging. Results from factor analyses show that these crime victims perceived police attitudes to be characterised by either dominance or humanity. While being interviewed, crime victims either responded with feelings of anxiety or feelings of being respected, the latter of which encouraged them to be cooperative. Logistic regressions revealed that interviews marked by dominance and responses of anxiety are significantly associated with crime victims who omit information. Interviews marked by humanity, responses of feeling respected, and cooperation are significantly associated with crime victims who provide information.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrockP.FisherR.P.CutlerB.L. (1999). Examining the cognitive interview in a double-test paradigm. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5, 29–45.
2.
BullR.CorranE. (2002). Interviewing child witnesses: Past and future. International Journal of Police Science & Management, Vol. 4, 315–322.
3.
ClarkeC.MilneR. (2001). National evaluation of the peace investigative interviewing course. (Home Office, UK, Police Research Award Scheme, Report No. PRSA/149). Retreived from http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/peace_interviewcourse.pdf.
4.
ClarkeC.MilneR. (2003, July). Interviews with victims and witnesses; The reality. Paper presented at the Psychology & Law International, Interdisciplinary Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland.
5.
CurrieD.H.MacLeanB.D. (1997). Measuring violence against women. In SwartzM. D. (Ed.), Researching sexual violence against women; methodological and personal perspectives. London: Sage Publications.
6.
DahlS. (1993). Rape—a hazard to health. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
7.
DoernerW.G.LabS.P. (1998). Victimology. Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing Co.
8.
FisherR.P.GeiselmanR.E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interview; the cognitive interview. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas Publishing.
9.
FreedyJ.R.ResnickH.S. (1994). The psychological adjustment of recent crime victims in the criminal justice system. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9(4), 450–69.
10.
GudjonssonG. (1992). The psychology of interrogations, confessions and testimony. Chichester: Wiley.
11.
HolmbergU.ChristiansonS-Å. (2002). Murderers' and sexual offenders' experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 1–14.
12.
JohnsonK.W. (1997). Professional help and crime victims. Social Service Review, March, 89–109.
13.
KebbellM.R.MilneR. (1998). Police officers' perception of eyewitness performance in forensic investigation. Journal of Social Psychology, 138(3), 323–30.
14.
KilpatrickD.G.SaunderB.E.VeronenL.J.BestC.L.VonJ.M. (1987). Criminal victimization: Lifetime prevalence, reporting to police, and psychological impact. Crime & Delinquency, 33(4), 479–89.
15.
MilneR.BullR. (1999). Investigative interviewing; psychology and practice. Chichester: Wiley.
16.
NorrisF.H.KaniastyK. (1991). The psychological experiences of crime: A test of the mediating role of beliefs in explaining the distress of victims. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10(3), 239–61.
17.
PennebakerJ.W. (1997). Opening up; the healing power of expressing emotions. New York: The Guilford Press.
18.
RenkB. (1997). Victims of crime in a public health perspective. Gothenburg: Nordic School of Public Health.
19.
ResickP.A.NishithP. (1997). Sexual Assault. In DavisR. C.LurigioA. J.SkoganW.G. (Eds.), Victims of crime. London: Sage Publications.
20.
RountreeP. W. (1998). A re-examination of the crime–fear linkage. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 35(3), 341–73.
ShepherdE.MilneR. (1999). Full and faithful: Ensuring quality practice and integrity of outcomes in witness interviews. In Heaton-ArmstrongA.ShepherdE.WolchoverD. (Eds.), Analysing Witness Testimony: A Guide for Legal Practitioners and Other Professionals. London: Blackstone Press Limited.
23.
ShepherdE.MortimerA.TurnerV.WatsonJ. (1999). Spaced cognitive interviewing: Facilitating therapeutic and forensic narration of trauma memories. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5, 117–43.
24.
SloboginC. (1996). Therapeutic jurisprudence; five dilemmas to ponder. In WexlerD.B.WinickB.J. (Eds.), Law in a Therapeutic Key (pp. 763–93). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
25.
StephensB.J.SindenP.G. (2000). Victims' voices; domestic assault victims' perceptions of police demeanor. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(5), 534–47.
26.
Swedish National Police Board, Division of Inspection. (1999). Observation at inspections of crime investigative work (Reg. No. VKA-128-5535/99). Stockholm: The Swedish National Police Board.
27.
WexlerD.B. (2000). Practicing therapeutic jurisprudence: Psychological soft spots and strategies. In StolleD. P.WexlerD. B.WinickB. J., (Eds.), Practicing Therapeutic Jurisprudence; Law as a Helping Profession (pp. 45–67). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
28.
Willis-CenterS.L. (2000). Victimization: Trauma symptoms and the role of the criminal justice system. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61(1-B), 552.
29.
WinickB.J. (2000). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the role of counsel in litigation. In StolleD. P.WexlerD. B.WinickB.J. (Eds.), Practicing Therapeutic Jurisprudence; Law as a Helping Profession (pp. 309–24). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
