Influence of the Metal Film Thickness on the Sensitivity of Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensors

Abstract

The influence of the metal film thickness (i.e., the chromium adhesion promoting film and the gold film) on the sensitivity of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) signals (i.e., resonance angle shift and reflectance change) towards the thickness variation of the nonabsorbing dielectric film is investigated. The sensitivity of reflectance change decreases when a thick chromium film or a thin gold film is employed. Its linear range becomes narrower as the thickness of the metal films increases. The sensitivity and linear range of the resonance angle shift are not affected by the thickness variation of the metal films. The phenomena were theoretically explained based on the attenuated total reflection (ATR) generated evanescent field at the prism/metal interface and the SPR-generated evanescent field at the metal/dielectric interface.

Keywords

Surface plasmon resonance SPR Metal film Sensitivity Evanescent field

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barns

W. L.

Dereux

and Ebbesen

T. W

, Nature (London) 424, 824 (2003).

Knoll

, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 49, 569 (1998).

Homola

Yee

S. S.

and Gauglitz

, Sens. Actuators, B 54, 3 (1999).

Salamon

Macleod

H. A.

and Tollin

, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1331, 117 (1997).

Cooper

M. A.

, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 377, 834 (2003).

Green

R. J.

Frazier

R. A.

Shakesheff

K. M.

Davies

M. C.

Roberts

C. J.

and Tendler

J. B

, Biomaterials 21, 1823 (2000).

Spinke

Liley

Guder

H.-J.

Angermaier

and Knoll

, Langmuir 9, 1821 (1993).

Pettit

C. M.

Assiongbon

K. A.

Garland

J. E.

and Roy

, Sens. Actuators, B 69, 105 (2003).

Neumann

Johansson

M.-L.

Kambhampati

and Knoll

, Adv. Funct. Mater. 12, 575 (2002).

10.

Yao

D. F.

and Knoll

, Anal. Chem. 75, 2610 (2003).

11.

Kurihara

Nakamura

and Suzuki

, Sens. Actuators, B 86, 49 (2002).

12.

Kurihara

Nakamura

Hirayama

and Suzuki

, Anal. Chem. 74, 6323 (2002).

13.

Jung

Campbell

C. T.

Chinowsky

T. M.

Mar

M. N.

and Yee

S. S

, Langmuir 14, 5636 (1998).

14.

Haemers

Koper

G. J. M.

Van der Leeden

and Frens

, Langmuir 18, 2069 (2002).

15.

Kolomenskii

A. A.

Gershon

P. D.

and Schuessler

H. A

, Appl. Opt. 36, 6539 (1997).

16.

Ehler

T. T.

and Noe

L. J

, Langmuir 11, 4177 (1995).

17.

Luck

L. A.

Moravan

M. J.

Garland

J. E.

Salopek-Sondi

and Roy

, Biosens. Bioelectron. 19, 249 (2003).

18.

Hutter

Fendler

J. H.

and Roy

, J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 11159 (2001).

19.

Baba

Park

M.-K.

Advincula

R. C.

and Knoll

, Langmuir 18, 4648 (2002).

20.

Garland

J. E.

Assiongbon

K. A.

Pettit

C. M.

and Roy

, Anal. Chim. Acta 475, 47 (2003).

21.

Ekgasit

Thammacharoen

and Knoll

, Anal. Chem. 76, 561 (2004).

22.

Ekgasit

Thammacharoen

and Knoll

, Anal. Chem. 76, 2210 (2004).

23.

Hansen

W. N.

, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58, 380 (1968).

24.

Bos

L. W.

and Lynch

D. W

, Phys. Rev. B 2, 4567 (1970).

25.

Roy

, Appl. Spectrosc. 55, 1046 (2001).

26.

Chah

Pettit

C. M.

Roy

and Fendler

J. H

, Langmuir 18, 314 (2002).

27.

Ando

and Suzuki

, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 281, 68 (1997).