Formulation and pH of the Buffered Ethanol Fixative BE70

In response to the letter to the editor by Kiernan ¹ concerning details on formulation and pH of BE70, ² we apologize for the inconsistent use of abbreviations in the formulation of the fixative. Our initial discovery was that a fixative of 70% ethanol made with (1×) PBS was superior to a fixative of 70% ethanol made with distilled water. This initiated a series of studies, of which only a limited number of combinations could be accommodated in the final article, resulting in the final fixative we termed BE70.

The notation “(EGAP; BE70)” would have been better left as only “BE70.” “EGAP” is the internal laboratory shorthand of the components—ethanol, glycerol, (glacial acetic) acid, and P(BS). The formulation of BE70 is as stated:

This rather arcane approach to describing the formulation of solutions is in fact common to many histology manuals. A more standard recipe for BE70 is as follows.

First prepare stock solution consisting of 50 ml of 10× PBS (pH 7.4), 12.5 ml of 80% glycerol, and 5 ml of glacial acetic acid. Adjust the pH to 4.3 with NaOH and then fill to 300 ml with distilled water. Before use, mix 300 ml of this stock solution and 700 ml of absolute (200 proof) EtOH for a total volume of 1000 ml. The pH of the final composition is approximately 6.1, and the fixative has no precipitate at 4C storage.

In reference to the pH of BE70, we evaluated BE70 at different pH values ranging from 4 to 7, and were unable to discern a measurable difference in histomorphology or RNA quality, which we have previously demonstrated to be the most sensitive metric for tissue fixation and processing ³ ; however, we chose a more neutral pH in an effort to avoid requiring additional shipping and storage precautions associated with acid pH reagents, as well as not damage tissue processing hardware. The subject of fixative pH is complex. To our knowledge, the first report concerning the introduction of buffers into a fixative is from 1894 by Mann, ⁴ as recounted by Burke, ⁵ who argued for pyridine–formalin. Lillie comments on the common use of calcium carbonate and magnesium carbonate as buffering agents, resulting in pH levels between 6.3 and 7.5. ⁶ Fox notes that a pH above 6.1 reduces the formation of “formalin pigment,” a derivative of hematin. ⁷ We did not observe the formation of any pigments associated with pH.