Since pro-arrest policies in domestic violence became popular in the United States in the 1980s, numerous western countries have followed suit. In most cases, research has shown that implementation of the policies has fallen short of expectations, with arrest rates that are surprisingly low. In New Zealand, pro–arrest strategies have been employed since 1987 and results have been similar. This article argues that one of the reasons for noncompliance in New Zealand (and probably elsewhere), is that the complexities of domestic violence situations make pro–arrest difficult to apply in practice. Moreover, in order to protect themselves from official criticism for deviating from policy, in this study frontline police sometimes filed incomplete or inaccurate incident reports. This made it hard to determine exactly how well the policy was being implemented and whether or not it was working.
AllenR.J. (1984). Foreword: The nature of discretion. Law and Contemporary Problems, 47, 1–13.
2.
BelknapJ.McCallK.D. (1994). Woman battering and police referrals. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22(3), 223–236
3.
BerkR.A.CampbellA.KlapR.WesternB. (1992). A Bayesian analysis of the Colorado Springs Abuse Experiment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83(1), 170–200
4.
BerlinerL. (1990). Domestic violence: A humanist or feminist issue?. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5(2), 128–129
5.
BinderA.MeekerJ.W. (1988). Experiments as reforms. Journal of Criminal Justice, 16, 347–358.
6.
BittnerE. (1967). The police on skid row: A study of peacekeeping. American Sociological Review, 32, 699–715.
7.
BlackD.J. (1980). The manners and customs of the police. New York: Academic Press.
8.
BlountW.R.YegidisB.L.MaheuxR.M. (1992). Police attitudes toward preferred arrest: Influences of rank and productivity. American Journal of Police, 11(3), 35–52
9.
BogradM. (1990). Why we need gender to understand human violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5(1), 132–135
10.
BourgS.StockH.V. (1994). A review of domestic violence statistics in a police department using a pro–arrest policy: Are pro–arrest policies enough?. Journal of Family Violence, 9(2), 177–189
11.
BuschR.RobertsonN.R.LapsleyH. (1992). Protection from family violence: A study of protection orders under the Domestic Protection Act.Wellington, New Zealand: Victims Task Force.
12.
ButterworthS. (2005). More than law and order: Policing in a changing society: 1945–92. The history of policing in New Zealand, Vol. 5. Dunedin, New Zealand: Otago University Press.
13.
BuzawaE. (1988). Explaining variations in police response to domestic violence: A case study in Detroit and New England. In HotalingG.FinkelhorD.KirkpatrickJ.StrausM. (Eds.), Coping with family violence: Research and policy perspectives (pp.169–182). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
BuzawaE.AustinT.L.BuzawaC. (1995). Responding to crimes of violence against women: Gender differences versus organizational imperatives. Crime and Delinquency, 41, 443–466.
15.
BuzawaC.BuzawaE. (1990). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. London: Sage.
16.
BuzawaC.BuzawaE. (1993). The impact of arrest on domestic violence. American BehavioralScientist, 36, 558–574.
17.
CarbonattoH. (1998). The criminal justice system response to domestic violence in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University Press.
18.
ChaneyC.K.SaltzsteinG.H. (1998). Democratic control and bureaucratic responsiveness: The police and domestic violence. American Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 745–768
19.
ChattertonM. (1979). The supervision of patrol work under the fixed points system. In HoldawayS. (Ed.), The British police. London: Edward Arnold.
DennehyG.NewboldG. (2001). The girls in the gang. Auckland, New Zealand: Reed.
22.
DobashR.E.DobashR. (1979). Violence against wives. New York: Free Press.
23.
DobashR.E.DobashR. (1992). Women, violence and social change. London: Routledge.
24.
DuganL. (2003). Domestic violence legislation: Exploring its impact on the likelihood of domestic violence, police involvement, and arrest. Criminology and Public Policy, 2(2), 283–312
25.
DunfordF.W.HuizingaD.ElliottD.S. (1990). The role of arrest in domestic assault: The Omaha Experiment. Criminology, 28(2), 183–206
26.
EdwardsS. (1989). Policing domestic violence: Women, the law and the state. London: Sage.
27.
EigenbergH.MScarboroughK.E.KappelerV.H. (1996). Contributory factors affecting arrest in domestic and non–domestic cases. American Journal of Police,15(2), 27–54
28.
EitleD. (2005). The influence of mandatory arrest policies, police organizational characteristics, and situational variables on the probability of arrest in domestic cases. Crime and Delinquency,51(4),573–597
29.
ElseA. (1980, November). The killing of Leigh Minnitt. Broadsheet, 84, 25–9
30.
EricsonR.V. (2005). The police as reproducers of order. In NewburnT. (Ed), Policing: key readings. Collumpton, UK: Willan.
31.
FederL. (1997). Domestic violence and police response in a pro–arrest jurisdiction. Women and Criminal Justice, 8, 79–98.
32.
FederL. (1998). Police handling of domestic and nondomestic assault calls: Is there a case for discrimination?. Crime and Delinquency, 44, 335–350.
33.
FelsonR.B.AckermanJ. (2001). Arrest orders for domestic and other assaults. Criminology, 9(3), 655–675
34.
FelsonR.B.PareP-P. (2007). Does the criminal justice system treat domestic violence and sexual assault offenders leniently?Justice Quarterly, 24(3), 435–460.
35.
FerraroK.J. (1989a). Policing woman battering. Social Problems, 36(1), 61–74
36.
FerraroK.J. (1989b). The legal response to women battering in the US. In HanmerJ.RadfordJ.StankoE. (Eds.), Women, policing, and male violence (pp. 155–184). London: Routledge.
37.
FinnM.A.Sims BlackwellB.StalansL.J.StuddardS.DuganL. (2004). Dual arrest in domestic violence cases: The influence of departmental policies. Crime and Delinquency, 50(4), 565–589
38.
FordG. (1985). Domestic disputes: A police perspective. An analysis of domestic dispute complaints attended by the police in Hamilton. Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato.
39.
FordG. (1986). Research project on domestic disputes: Final report. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Police.
40.
FordG. (1993). A review of the 1987 police policy on domestic violence. Wellington, New Zealand: Policing Development Group.
41.
GarnerJ.H.MaxwellC.D. (2000). What are the lessons of the police arrest studies?Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 4(1), 83–114.
42.
GellesR.J. (1993). Constraints against family violence: How well do they work?. American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 575–586.
43.
GraceS. (1995). Policing domestic violence in the 1990s (Home Office Research Study No.19). London: Home Office.
44.
GrosmanB.A. (1975). Police command: Decisions and discretion. Toronto: Macmillan.
45.
HanmerJ.GriffithsS. (2000). Reducing domestic violence: What works Policing and reducing crime briefing note. London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
46.
HaralambosM.HolbornM. (1990). Sociology: Themes and perspectives. London: Unwin Hyman.
47.
HirschelD.BuzawaE.PattavinaA.FaggianiD. (2008). Domestic violence and mandatory arrest laws: To what extent do they influence police arrest decisions?Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 98(3), 255–298
48.
HirschelR.J.HutchinsonI.W. (1992). Female spouse abuse and the police response: The Charlotte, North Carolina experiment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83(1), 73–119
49.
HoyleC.SandersA. (2000). Police response to domestic violence: From victim choice to victim empowerment. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 14–36.
50.
JonesD.A.BelknapJ. (1999). Police responses to battering in a progressive pro-arrest jurisdiction. Justice Quarterly, 16, 249–274.
51.
KelleyL.BindelJ.BurtonS.ButterworthD.CookK.ReganL. (1999). Domestic violence matters: An evaluation of a development project (Home Office Research Study 193). London: Home Office.
52.
KingsnorthR.F.MacIntoshR.C. (2007). Intimate partner violence: The role of suspect gender in prosecutorial decision–making. Justice Quarterly, 24(3), 460–493
53.
LaGrangeR.L. (1993). Policing American society. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
54.
LawrenzF.LemboJ.SchadeT. (1988). Time series analysis of the effect of a domestic violence directive on the number of arrests per day. Journal of Criminal Justice, 16, 493–498.
55.
LipskyM. (1980). Street–level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
56.
MagdolL.MoffittT.E.CaspiA.NewmanD.L.FaganJ.SilvaP.A. (1997). Gender differences and partner violence in a birth cohort of 21–year–olds: Bridging the gap between clinical and epidemiological approaches. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(1), 68–78
57.
MakepeaceJ.M. (1986). Gender differences in courtship violence victimization. Family Relations, 5, 383–388.
58.
ManningP.K. (2003). Policing contingencies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59.
ManningP.K.van MaanenJ. (1978). Policing: A view from the street. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
60.
MarshE.F. (1989). Commissioner's 1987 domestic dispute policy changes: National implementation. Wellington, New Zealand: Policing Development Group.
Maynard-MoodyS.MushenoM. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
63.
McNeelyR.L.MannC.R. (1990). Domestic violence is a human issue. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5(1), 129–132
64.
MeltonH.C. (1999). Police response to domestic violence. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 29(1), 1–21
65.
MignonS.I.HolmesW.M. (1995). Police response to mandatory arrest laws. Crime and Delinquency, 41(4), 430–442
66.
MorleyR.MullenderA. (1994). Preventing domestic violence to women (Police Research Group Crime Prevention Unit Series, paper No. 8). London: Home Office Police Department.
67.
MugfordJ.MugfordS. (1992). Policing domestic violence. In MoirP.EijkmanH. (Eds.), Policing Australia: Old issues, new perspectives (pp. 321–351) Melbourne, Australia: MacMillan.
68.
NewboldG. (2000). Crime in New Zealand. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore.
69.
NewboldG.CrossJ. (2008). Domestic violence and pro–arrest policy. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 33, 1–14.
70.
O'LeeryK.D.BarlingJ.AriasI.RosebaumA.MaloneJ.TyreeA. (1989). Prevalence and stability of physical aggression between spouses: A longitudinal analysis.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 263–268.
71.
Ombudsman of Western Australia.(2003). An investigation into the police response to assault in the family home. Perth, Australia: Author.
72.
PateA.HamiltonE. (1992). Formal and informal deterrents to domestic violence: The Dade County Spouse Assault Experiment. American Sociological Review, 57(5), 691–697
73.
PlotnikoffJ.WoolfstonR. (1998). Policing domestic violence: Effective organisational structures (Research Series Paper 100). London: Home Office.
74.
ProttasJ.M. (1978). The power of the street–level bureaucrat in public service bureaucracies. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 13, 285–312.
75.
Reiss, Jr.A.J. (1996). Consequences of compliance and deterrence models of law enforcement for the exercise of police discretion. In ReinerR. (Ed.), Policing: controlling the controllers: Police discretion and accountability (pp. 151–184). Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth.
76.
RobertsonA.L.BuschR. (1993). Hamilton Abuse Pilot Intervention Project (HAIPP): Two–year review. Hamilton, New Zealand: HAIPP Monitoring Team of Waikato.
77.
RobinsonA.L.ChandekM.S. (2000a). Differential police response to Black battered women. Women and Criminal Justice, 12(2/3), 29–61
78.
RobinsonA.L.ChandekM.S. (2000b). The domestic violence arrest decision: Examining demographic, attitudinal, and situational variables. Crime and Delinquency, 46(1), 18–37
79.
SandersA.YoungR. (2003). Police powers. In NewburnT. (Ed.), Handbook of policing (pp. 228–258). Collompton, UK: Willan.
80.
SchollumM. (1996). Police officers' response to the family violence policy in New Zealand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81.
ShermanL.W. (1992) Policing domestic violence: Experiments and dilemmas. New York: Free Press.
82.
ShermanL.W.BerkR.A. (1984). The Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment. Washington, DC: Police Foundation Reports.
83.
ShermanL.W.SchmidtJ.D.RoganD.P.SmithD.A.GartinP.R.CohnE.G.CollinsD.J.BacichA.R. (1992). The variable effects of arrest on criminal careers: The Milwaukee Domestic Violence Experiment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83(1), 137–169
84.
SimpsonS.S.BouffardL.A.GarnerJ.HickmanL. (2006). The influence of legal reform on the probability of arrest in domestic violence cases. Justice Quarterly, 23(3), 297–317
85.
SmithD.J.GrayJ. (1983). The police in action. London: Policy Studies Institute.
86.
Stark,E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York: Oxford.
87.
SteinmetzS. (1977). The cycle of violence: Aggressive and abusive family interaction. New York: Praeger.
88.
SteinmetzS. (1977–78). The bashed husband syndrome. Victimology, 2(3–4), 499–509
89.
StrausM.A.GellesR.J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed in two national surveys. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 633–644.
90.
StrausM.A.GellesR.J.SteinmetzS. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. New York: Anchor.
91.
ThorpT.M. (1997). Review of firearms control in New Zealand: Report of an independent inquiry commissioned by the Minister of Police. Wellington, New Zealand: GP Print.
92.
WalkerL. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper Row.
93.
WalkerS. (1992). The police in America. New York: McGraw-Hill.
94.
WilsonJ.Q. (1968). Varieties of police behavior: The management of law and order in eight communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
95.
WordenR.E. (1989). Situational and attitudinal explanations of police behavior: A theoretical reappraisal and empirical assessment. Law and Society Review, 23, 667–711.
96.
ZorzaJ. (1994). Must we stop arresting batterers? Analysis and policy implications of new domestic violence studies. New England Law Review, 28(4), 929–990
