This study reviews a selection of research articles on police torture in China, published in Chinese language academic journals between 1994 and 2008 as well as recent literature on Chinese policing and criminal procedure in English. The study shows that Chinese legal scholars have devoted considerable attention to the subject of police interrogational torture and have presented evidence that interrogational torture is a pervasive problem in criminal investigations in China. While the mainstream legal scholarship treats the gaps or ambiguities in the law as the major cause of police torture, others relate it to the organisation and structure of the Chinese criminal justice system. Some studies conclude that traditional and cultural Chinese values account for the tolerance and acceptance of police torture. The article concludes that answers about how to protect suspects’ rights and reduce interrogational torture in criminal proceedings in China can be found in adaptations of structural elements of the legal landscape, but also in practices and traditions with strong cultural connections.
BiX.Q.(2007). Legal regulations on the investigative interrogation [zhenchaxunwen guocheng falvwenti yanjiu]. Journal of Chinese People's Public Security University, 125, 130–136.
2.
BrooksP.(2000). Troubling confessions: Speaking guilt in law & literature.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BuA.C.(2003). Legal cultural views on crimes of ‘Extorting confessions by torture’ [xingxunbigong fanzui de fawenhua kaocha]. Journal of Zhejiang Police College Public Security Science, 76, 30–32, 87.
4.
CaoL.HouC.(2001). A comparison of confidence in the police in China and in the United States. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29(2), 87.
5.
ChenB.(2003). Explaining the reasons of ‘using torture to coerce statements’ [jiedu xiandai ‘xingxunbigong’ xianxiang de genbenyuanyi]. Journal of Jiangxi Public Security College, 78, 30–34.
6.
ChenR.H.(2000). From ‘streamlined-production’ to ‘judicial-centered system’: An approach concerning the reform of criminal judicature in China [cong ‘liushuizuoye’ zouxiang ‘caipan weizhongxin’ — duizhongguo sifagaige de yizhongsikao]. Law Science, 521, 24–30, 34.
7.
ChenR.H.(2005). The non-voluntary presumption of confession out of court: One legislative approach to solve the problem of inquisition by torture [tingwai gongshubilu de feiziyuanxing tuiding yuanze — jiejue xingxunbigong wenti de yizhongsilu]. Legal Forum, 96, 5–10.
8.
ChenR.H.(2006). To provide for new rights or to strengthen remedies? [zengliequanli haishi jiaqiangjiuji]. Global Law Review, 161, 530–536.
9.
ChenY.S.(2007). A perspective of China's criminal misjudgment [woguo xingshiwupan wentitoushi]. China Legal Science, 137, 45–61.
10.
ChuC.-c.BoddeD.MorrisC. (1973). Law in imperial China: Exemplified by 190 Ch’ing Dynasty cases; with historical, social and juridical commentaries (translated from the Hsing-an huilan). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
11.
CuiM.(2003). Holding back interrogational torture [zailun ezhi xingxunbigong]. Journal of Zhejiang Police College: Public Security Science Journal, 76, 24–29.
12.
DamaskaM.(1997). The uncertain fate of evidentiary transplants: Anglo-American and continental experiments. American Journal of Comparative Law, 45(4), 839–852.
13.
DavidsonR.WangZ.(1996). The court system in the People's Republic of China with a case study of criminal trial. InEbbeO.N.I.(Ed.), Comparative and international criminal justice systems: Policing, judiciary, and corrections (pp. 139–153). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
14.
DongX.W.(2004). Rethinking profoundly over the death cases because of interrogational torture in the past ten years [shinian xingxunbigong zhirensiwang anjian de huiguyufansi]. Journal of Zhejiang Police College: Public Security Journal, 81, 5–7.
15.
DuttonM.TianfuL.(1993). Missing the target? Policing strategies in the period of economic reform. Crime and Delinquency, 39(3), 316–336.
16.
DuttonM.(2005). Toward a government of the contract: Policing in the era of reform. InBakkenB.(Ed.), Crime, policing, and punishment in China (pp. 189–234). New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
17.
EinolfC.J.(2007). The fall and rise of torture: A comparative and historical analysis. Sociological Theory, 25(2), 101–121.
18.
FuH.L.(1998). Criminal defence in China: The possible impact of the 1996 Criminal Procedural Law Reform. China Quarterly, 153, 31–48.
19.
JingM.(2007). Extortion of confessions by torture and its hazards [dui xingxunbigong jiqi weihai de sikao]. Public Administration and Law, 162, 89–90.
20.
HaleyJ.O.(1994). Authority without power: Law and the Japanese paradox. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
HanL.(2005). Reexamination and reconstruction of the judicial control of torture [woguo fatingzhili xingxunbigong zhi fansiyuchonggou]. Legal Forum, 96, 21–25.
22.
HeQ.S.(2005), Probe deeply into the origin of ‘investigation and interrogation as a difficult matter in practice’ and countermeasures [‘zhenchaxunwen nan’ de chengyinyuduice xintan]. Journal of Chinese People's Security University, 113, 91–96.
23.
HeY.J.(2006). Plea bargaining and interrogational torture [cong biansujiaoyi kan xingxunbigong]. Journal of Jiangxi Public Security College, 104, 93–96.
24.
HuH.C.(1944). The Chinese concepts of ‘face’. American Anthropology, 46, 45–64.
25.
HuM.(2007). Extorting confessions by torture: From the perspective of criminal policy [xingshizhengce xia de xingxunwenti]. Global Law Review, 110, 15–22.
26.
HuS.Y.(2007). Improving the legal system of ‘strict prohibition of interrogational torture’ [wanshan ‘yanjin xingxunbigong’ falvzhidu — jiantan ‘budeqiangpo zizhengqizui’]. Law Science Magazine, 160, 109–111.
27.
HuangQ.F.(2002). Another thought on the prevention of interrogational torture: From the angle of restricting the interrogatory power [yetan zhizhi xingxunbigong: congzhiyue xunwenquan de jiaodu]. Journal of National Procurators College, 36, 81–86.
28.
JiangR.B.(2003). Interrogational torture and feudal ‘common person sense’ [xingxunbigong yu fengjianzhuyi ‘caominyishi’]. YanHuang ChunQiu, 131, 35–39.
29.
JiangS.,LambertE.WangJ.(2007). Correlates of formal and informal social/crime control in China: An exploratory study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35(3), 261–271.
30.
JorgN.FieldS.BrantsC.(1995). Are inquisitorial and adversarial systems converging?InFnnellP.HardingC.JorgN.(Eds.), Criminal justice in Europe: A comparative study (pp. 41–56). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
31.
KamisarY.(1966). A dissent from the Miranda Dissents: Some comments on the ‘New’ Fifth Amendment and the old ‘Voluntariness’ test’. Michigan Law Review, 65(1), 59–104.
32.
Kitai-SangeroR.(2007). Detention for the purpose of interrogation as modern ‘torture’. University of Detroit Mercy Law Review, 85, 137–162.
33.
KitayamaS.MarkusH.R.KurokawaM. (2000). Culture, emotion, and well-being: Good feelings in Japan and the United States. Cognition and Emotion, 14(1), 93–124.
34.
KwokD, (1998). On the rites and rights of being human. InDe BaryW.T.TuW., (Eds.), Confucianism and human rights (pp. 83–93). New York: Columbia University Press.
35.
LangbeinJ.(1977). Torture and the law of proof: Europe and England in the Ancien Regime.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
LeoR.A.(1996). Inside the interrogation room. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86(2), 266–303.
37.
LeoR.A.(1996). Miranda's revenge: Police interrogation as a confidence game. Law and Society Review, 30(2), 259–288.
38.
LeoR.A.(2008). Police interrogation and American justice.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
LevinsonS.(2004). Acknowledgments. InLevinsonS.(Ed.), Torture: A collection (pp. 19–22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LeoR.A.OfsheR.J. (1998). The consequences of false confessions: Deprivations of liberty and miscarriages of justice in the age of psychological interrogation. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. 88(2), 429–496.
42.
LiF.C.(2002). On rampant situation of using torture to coerce statements [xingrujiu, jianfusheng—congxianshi, chuantong zexue, renxing cengmian jiedu xingxunbigong]. Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College, 52, 51–53.
43.
LiN.L.(2007). Theoretical analysis of the criminal interrogation procedure [zhenchaxunwen chengxun de falifenxi]. XiangChao, 269, 19–20.
44.
LiJ.WangL.FischerK.(2004). The organisation of Chinese shame concepts?Cognition & Emotion, 18(6), 767–797.
45.
LiangY.X.(2002). The procedural significance of investigative interrogation [zhenchaxunwen de chengxuyiyi]. Law Review, 114, 55–61.
46.
LiangB.LuH.,MietheT.D.ZhangL.(2006). Sources of variation in pro-death penalty attitudes in China. British Journal of Criminology, 46(1), 119–130.
47.
LinL.H.YuT.ZhangC.(2006). Survey report: Social cognition of extorting confessions by torture — the police [xingxunbigong shehuirenzhi baogao — jingcha juan]. Law Review, 139, 123–140.
48.
LinL.H.ZhaoQ.L.HuangQ.H.(2006). Survey report: Social Cognition of extorting confessions by torture — the general public [xingxunbigong shehuirenzhi baogao–minzhongjuan]. Law Review, 138. 117–135.
49.
LiuA.(2007). Limitations of external forces in deterring interrogational torture and root causes [xingxunbigong de waibu ezhililiang quexian jiqi genyuan]. Journal of Beijing People's Police College, 120, 25–28.
50.
LiuF.Q.(2008). Interrogation in criminal investigation: the whole function and its difference at different stages — an empirical research [zhenchazhong de xunwen: zhengtigongneng yu jieduanchayi — jiyu shizheng de yanjiu]. Journal of Fujian Police Academy, 101, 26–33.
51.
LiuL.M.LiuC.X.(2004). Using human rights education to eliminate interrogational torture [guanyu baohurenquan, ezhi xingxunbigong jiaoyu de sikao]. Journal of Jilin Public Security Academy, 77, 62–66.
52.
LiuY.Q.ZuoD.Q.(2005). Historic reasonability and current criticism of interrogational torture [xingxunbigong de lishihelixing ji xianshipipan]. Journal of National Procurators College, 55, 133–137.
53.
LuQ.(2006). Lawyer's presence right in criminal investigative interrogation [zhencha xunwen zhong de lvshi zaichangquan de goujian]. Legal System and Society, 4, 85–86.
54.
LuH.DrassK.(2002). Transience and the disposition of theft cases in China. Justice Quarterly, 19(1), 69–96.
55.
LuoW.L.(2002). The legal system causes of extorting confessions by torture and solutions [xingxunbigong de zhidu chengyin jiqi duice]. Journal of Sichuan Police College, 60, 34–37.
56.
LvP.ZhangH.Z.(2000). A new explanation of causes of interrogational torture and remedies [xingxunbigong chanshengyuanyin ji duice xinjie]. People's Procuratorial Semimonthly, 1066, 14–19.
57.
MaG.X.NiZ.R.(2002). Rebuilding the interrogation system based on separation of powers [jianli qiangzhigeli xunwenzhidu de gouxiang]. Chinese Criminal Science, 52, 78–82.
58.
MaJ.H.PengM.(2006). Illegal interrogation: A research on empirical viewpoint—an analysis mainly on the model of s province [feifashenxun: yige shizhengjiaodu de yanjiu—yiSsheng wei zhuyaoyangben de fenxi]. Journal of Fujian Public Safety College, 92, 22–29, 42.
59.
MaY.(2003). The powers of the police and the rights of suspects under the amended Criminal Procedure Law of China. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Manage ment, 26(3), 490–510.
60.
ManM.A.(2008). Improving procuratorial supervision over interrogation [wanshan jianchajiguan dui zhenchaxunwen de falvjiandu]. Hebei Law Science, 176, 182–187.
61.
MouJ.(2005). Defending for confession's central position in evidences [kougong zhongxinzhuyi zhibian]. Hebei Law Science, 147, 33–38.
62.
NingJ.(2002). Economic analysis of torture in law enforcement [xunwen de jingjixue—dui xingxunbigong de jingjifenxi]. China Economic Quarterly, 4, 985–998.
63.
NowakM.McArthurE.BuchingerK.(2008). The United Nations Convention against Torture: A commentary. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64.
PeerenboomR.P.(2002). China's long march toward rule of law.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
65.
PeerenboomR. (2004). Out of the pan and into the fire: Well-intentioned but misguided recommendations to eliminate all forms of administrative detention in China. Northwestern University Law Review, 98(3), 991–1104.
66.
RenX. (1997), Tradition of the law and law of the tradition.Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
67.
TannerM.S.(2000). Shackling the coercive state: China's ambivalent struggle against torture. Problems of Post Communism, 47(5),13–30.
68.
ThelleH.(2006). Torture in China. Torture: Quarterly Journal on Rehabilitation of Torture Victims and Prevention of Torture, 16(3), 268–75.
69.
WanJ.(2005). Institutional causes of interrogational torture and countermeasures [xingxunbigong de xingshisusong zhidugenyuan yu xiangyingduice tantao]. Journal of Wuhan Public Security Cadre's College, 69, 34–36.
70.
WanH.(2007). An analysis of the crime of extorting confessions by torture [dui xingxunbigong quzheng fanzui tanxi]. Legal System and Society, 28, 273–275.
71.
WangM. (2002). Psychological causes of interrogational torture and restraint measures [minjing xingxunbigong de xinlizhuangtai jiqijiaozhi]. Journal of Hubei Police Officer College, 68, 34–36.
72.
WangZ.C.(2006). Tackling the persistent ailment of interrogational torture [zhiyizhi xingxunbigong zheyiwanzheng]. People's Procuratorial Semimonthly, 1199, 15–21.
73.
WuD.H.(2006a). A Positive study of exclusion of illegally obtained evidence: Cases concerning using torture to coerce confessions [feifazhengju paichuguize de shizhengyanjiu—yifayuan chuli xingxunbigong bianhuweili]. Modern Law Science, 147, 143–149.
74.
WuD.H.(2006b). Role, situation and sustainability: Analyzing interrogational torture from a socio-legal perspective [juese, qingjing yu shehuirongren: fashehuixue shiyezhongde xingxunbigong wenti]. Peking University Law Journal, 104, 147–169.
75.
WuJ.K.(2008). The permitting study of duplicity interrogating [qipianxing xunwen rongxuxing yanjiu]. Journal of Jiangxi Public Security College, 118, 28–35.
76.
WuH.Y.(2001). Research on the system of investigative interrogation [zhenchaxunwen zhidu yanjiu]. Chinese Criminal Science, 41, 61–74.
77.
YanX.D.(2004). The historical change and reasons of extorting confessions by torture [xingxunbigong de lishiliubian jiqi yuanyin]. Journal of Xiangtan University (Philosophy and Social Science), 122, 129–131.
78.
YaoJ.(2004). An analysis of the litigious rights of suspects in the investigative interrogation [zhenchaxunwen zhongde renquanwenti tanxi]. Academic Journal of Zhongzhou, 143, 206–208.
79.
YaoY.H.(2004). Regulating law enforcement to prevent extorting confessions by torture [guifanzhifa, zhi xingxunbigong zhi wanzheng]. Journal of Railway Police College, 14(1), 102–104.
80.
YiY.. (2008). Arrest as punishment. Punishment & Society, 10(1), 9–24.
81.
ZheF.M.(2005). The exclusionary rule for involuntary oral statements: From the perspective of torture [feiziyuankougong de paichuguize: cong xingxunbinggong jiaodu de fenxi]. Legal Forum, 96, 26–29.
82.
ZhengY.F. (2007). Sociology analysis of the causes of interrogational torture and prevention countermeasure [xingxunbigong chengyin ji fangfan duice de shehuixue fenxi]. Journal of Jiangxi Public Security College, 110, 81–85.
83.
ZhouF.T.(2006). Reconsideration on interrogational torture and countermeasures [xingxunbigong de fansiyuduice]. Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute, 85, 116–120.
84.
ZhuS.L.(2007). Political parties in China's judiciary. Duke Journal of Comparative & Inter national Law, 17(2), 533–560.
85.
ZhuX.Q.(2006). Personal reflections on lawyer's presence during criminal interrogations [zhenchaxunwenshi lvshi zaichang zhiwojian]. People's Procuratorial Semimonthly, 1210, 15–18.
86.
ZuoW.M.(2005). Elimination interrogational torture by legalizing investigation works [tuijin fazhihuajianshe ezhi xingxunbigong]. People's Procuratorial Semimonthly, 1178, 7–8.
87.
ZuoW. M.ZhouH.B.(2002). From legal to illegal: An analysis of interrogational torture in context [conghefa daofeifa: xingxunbigong de yujingfenxi]. Law Science, 552, 31–40.
