Corporate Social Responsibility in Business-to-Business Markets: How Organizational Customers Account for Supplier Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2013
Corporate Social Responsibility in Business-to-Business Markets: How Organizational Customers Account for Supplier Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement
Despite the high relevance of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in current business practice and the considerable research on CSR outcomes in consumer markets, investigations of its influence on organizational business relationships are scarce. Relying on instrumental stakeholder theory, the authors develop and empirically test a framework of the influence of a supplier's CSR engagement on organizational customer outcomes. Findings from an examination of 200 cross-industry supplier–customer dyads reveal positive effects of two facets of a supplier's CSR efforts on customer loyalty through distinct mechanisms. Business practice CSR fosters customers' trust, whereas philanthropic CSR strengthens customer–company identification. The authors distinguish a supplier's actual CSR engagement and customers' perception of these CSR activities. In addition, they consider central contingency factors reflecting uncertainty and dependence in business-to-business relationships that determine the effectiveness of CSR.
AguileraRuth V., RuppDeborah E., WilliamsCynthia A., and GanapathiJyoti (2007), “Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multilevel Theory of Social Change in Organizations,”Academy of Management Review, 32 (3), 836–63.
2.
AguinisHerman, and GlavasAnte (2012), “What We Know and Don't Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda,”Journal of Management, 38 (4), 932–68.
3.
AhearneMichael, BhattacharyaC.B., and GruenThomas (2005), “Antecedents and Consequences of Customer–Company Identification: Expanding the Role of Relationship Marketing,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (3), 574–85.
4.
AldrichH.A. (1979), Organizations and Environments.Engle-wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
AugerPat, BurkePaul, DevinneyTimothy M., and LouviereJordan J. (2003), “What Will Consumers Pay for Social Product Features?”Journal of Business Ethics, 42 (3), 281–304.
6.
BagozziRichard P., and YiYoujae (2012), “Specification, Evaluation, and Interpretation of Structural Equation Models,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40 (1), 8–34.
7.
BanerjeeSubhabrata B., IyerEaswar S., and KashyapRajiv K. (2003), “Corporate Environmentalism: Antecedents and Influence of Industry Type,”Journal of Marketing, 67 (April), 106–122.
8.
BarnettMichael L. (2007), “Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility,”Academy of Management Review, 32 (3), 794–816.
9.
BaroneMichael J., NormanAndrew T., and MiyazakiAnthony D. (2007), “Consumer Response to Retailer Use of Cause-Related Marketing: Is More Fit Better?”Journal of Retailing, 83 (4), 437–45.
BentlerPeter M., and BonettDouglas G. (1980), “Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures,”Psychological Bulletin, 88 (3), 588–606.
12.
BerensGuido, van RielCees B.M., and van BruggenGerrit H. (2005), “Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses: The Moderating Role of Corporate Brand Dominance,”Journal of Marketing, 69 (July), 35–48.
13.
BermanShawn L., WicksAndrew C., KothaSuresh, Thomas, and JonesM. (1999), “Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance,”Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5), 488–506.
14.
BettmanJames R. (1973), “Perceived Risk and Its Components: A Model and Empirical Test,”Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (May), 184–90.
15.
BhattacharyaC.B., KorschunDaniel, and SenSankar (2009), “Strengthening Stakeholder–Company Relationships Through Mutually Beneficial Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives,”Journal of Business Ethics, 85 (2), 257–72.
16.
BhattacharyaC.B., and SenSankar (2003), “Consumer–Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers' Relationships with Companies,”Journal of Marketing, 67 (April), 76–88.
17.
BhattacharyaC.B., and SenSankar (2004), “Doing Better at Doing Good,”California Management Review, 47 (1), 9–24.
18.
BloisKeith J. (1999), “Trust in Business to Business Relationships: An Evaluation of Its Status,”Journal of Management Studies, 36 (2), 197–215.
19.
BrownTom J., and DacinPeter A. (1997), “The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses,”Journal of Marketing, 61 (January), 68–84.
20.
BunnMichele D. (1993), “Taxonomy of Buying Decision Approaches,”Journal of Marketing, 57 (January), 38–56.
21.
CaldwellCam, Stephen, and ClaphamE. (2003), “Organizational Trustworthiness: An International Perspective,”Journal of Business Ethics, 47 (4), 349–64.
22.
CannonJoseph P., and PerreaultWilliam D.Jr. (1999), “Buyer–Seller Relationships in Business Markets,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (November), 439–60.
23.
CarrollArchie B. (1991), “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders,”Business Horizons, 34 (4), 39–48.
24.
CarrollArchie B., and ShabanaKareem M. (2010), “The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice,”International Journal of Management Reviews, 12 (1), 85–105.
25.
CarterCraig R., and JenningsMarianne M. (2004), “The Role of Purchasing in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Structural Equation Analysis,”Journal of Business Logistics, 25 (1), 145–86.
26.
ClarksonMax E. (1995), “A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance,”Academy of Management Review, 20 (1), 92–117.
27.
CohenJacob, CohenPatricia, WestStephen G., and AikenLeona S. (2003), Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3d ed.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28.
ConnellyBrian L., Trevis CertoS., Duane IrelandR., and ReutzelChristopher R. (2011), “Signaling Theory: A Review and an Assessment,”Journal of Management, 37 (1), 39–67.
29.
ConnellyBrian L., KetchenDavid J.Jr., and SlaterStanley F. (2010), “Toward a ‘Theoretical Toolbox’ for Sustainability Research in Marketing,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39 (1), 86–100.
30.
CookKaren S., CheshireCoye, and GerbasiAlexandra (2006), “Power, Dependence, and Social Exchange,” in Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, BurkePeter J., ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 194–216.
31.
CropanzanoRussell, Marie, and MitchellS. (2005), “Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review,”Journal of Management, 31 (6), 874–900.
32.
De CremerDavid, van DijkeMarius, Arjan, and BosE.R. (2006), “Leader's Procedural Justice Affecting Identification and Trust,”Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27 (7), 554–65.
33.
DonaldsonThomas, Lee, and PrestonE. (1995), “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications,”Academy of Management Review, 20 (1), 65–91.
34.
DoneyPatricia M., and CannonJoseph P. (1997), “An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer–Seller Relationships,”Journal of Marketing, 61 (April), 35–51.
35.
DrumwrightMinette E. (1994), “Socially Responsible Organizational Buying: Environmental Concern as a Noneconomic Buying Criterion,”Journal of Marketing, 58 (July), 1–19.
36.
DuShuili, BhattacharyaC.B., and SenSankar (2007), “Reaping Relational Rewards from Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Competitive Positioning,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24 (3), 224–41.
37.
DuShuili, BhattacharyaC.B., and SenSankar (2011), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitive Advantage: Overcoming the Trust Barrier,”Management Science, 57 (9), 1528–45.
38.
Egels-ZandénNiklas (2007), “Suppliers' Compliance with MNCs' Codes of Conduct: Behind the Scenes at Chinese Toy Suppliers,”Journal of Business Ethics, 75 (1), 45–62.
39.
FlynnFrancis J. (2005), “Identity Orientations and Forms of Social Exchange in Organizations,”Academy of Management Review, 30 (4), 737–50.
40.
FornellClaes, David, and LarckerF. (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (February), 39–50.
41.
FreemanR. Edward (1984), Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach.Boston: HarperCollins.
42.
FreemanR. Edward (1999), “Divergent Stakeholder Theory,”Academy of Management Review, 24 (2), 233–36.
43.
GodfreyPaul C., MerrillCraig B., and HansenJared M. (2009), “The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Value: An Empirical Test of the Risk Management Hypothesis,”Strategic Management Review, 30 (4), 425–45.
44.
GreenwoodMichelle, Harry, and van BurenJ. (2010), “Trust and Stakeholder Theory: Trustworthiness in the Organization–Stakeholder Relationship,”Journal of Business Ethics, 95 (3), 425–38.
45.
HeideJan B., and MinerAnne S. (1992), “The Shadow of the Future: Effects of Anticipated Interaction and Frequency of Contact on Buyer–Seller Cooperation,”Academy of Management Journal, 35 (2), 265–91.
46.
HoggMichael A., and TerryDeborah J. (2000), “Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts,”Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), 121–40.
47.
HomburgChristian, KlarmannMartin, and SchmittJens (2010), “Brand Awareness in Business Markets: When Is It Related to Firm Performance?”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27 (3), 201–212.
48.
HomburgChristian, WiesekeJan, Wayne, and HoyerD. (2009), “Social Identity and the Service–Profit Chain,”Journal of Marketing, 73 (March), 38–54.
49.
HuemerLars (2004), “Balancing Between Stability and Variety: Identity and Trust Trade-Offs in Networks,”Industrial Marketing Management, 33 (3), 251–59.
50.
HultG. Tomas M., MenaJeannette A., FerrellO.C., and FerrellLinda (2011), “Stakeholder Marketing: A Definition and Conceptual Model,”Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1 (1), 44–65.
51.
JarvisCheryl Burke, MacKenzieScott B., and PodsakoffPhilip M. (2003), “A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research,”Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (2), 199–218.
52.
JaworskiBernard J., and KohliAjay K. (1993), “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences,”Journal of Marketing, 57 (July), 53–70.
53.
JonesThomas M. (1995), “Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics,”Academy of Management Review, 20 (2), 404–437.
54.
KehHean T., and XieYi (2009), “Corporate Reputation and Customer Behavioral Intentions: The Roles of Trust, Identification and Commitment,”Industrial Marketing Management, 38 (7), 732–42.
55.
KleinJill, and DawarNiraj (2004), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumers' Attributions and Brand Evaluations in a Product-Harm Crisis,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21 (3), 203–217.
56.
KollockPeter (1994), “The Emergence of Exchange Structures: An Experimental Study of Uncertainty, Commitment, and Trust,”American Journal of Sociology, 100 (2), 313–45.
57.
KumarNirmalya, ScheerLisa K., and SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M. (1995), “The Effects of Perceived Interdependence on Dealer Attitudes,”Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (August), 348–56.
58.
LankoskiLeena (2009), “Differential Economic Impact of Corporate Responsibility Issues,”Business and Society, 48 (2), 206–224.
59.
LavelleJames J., RuppDeborah E., and BrocknerJoel (2007), “Taking a Multifoci Approach to the Study of Justice, Social Exchange, and Citizenship Behavior: The Target Similarity Model,”Journal of Management, 33 (6), 841–66.
60.
LawlerEdward J., ThyeShane R., and YoonJeongkoo (2000), “Emotion and Group Cohesion in Productive Exchange,”American Journal of Sociology, 106 (3), 616–57.
LichtensteinDonald R., DrumwrightMinette E., and BraigBridgette M. (2004), “The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Donations to Corporate-Supported Nonprofits,”Journal of Marketing, 68 (October), 16–32.
63.
LuchsMichael G., NaylorRebecca Walker, IrwinJulie R., and RaghunathanRajagopal (2010), “The Sustainability Liability: Potential Negative Effects of Ethicality on Product Preference,”Journal of Marketing, 74 (September), 18–31.
64.
LuoXueming, and BhattacharyaC.B. (2006), “Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value,”Journal of Marketing, 70 (October), 1–18.
65.
LuoXueming, and BhattacharyaC.B. (2009), “The Debate over Doing Good: Corporate Social Performance, Strategic Marketing Levers, and Firm-Idiosyncratic Risk,”Journal of Marketing, 73 (November), 198–213.
66.
MaignanIsabelle, and FerrellO.C. (2004), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32 (1), 3–19.
67.
MaignanIsabelle, FerrellO.C., and FerrellLinda (2005), “A Stakeholder Model for Implementing Social Responsibility in Marketing,”European Journal of Marketing, 39 (9/10), 956–77.
68.
MaignanIsabelle, FerrellO.C., and TomasG., HultM. (1999), “Corporate Citizenship: Cultural Antecedents and Business Benefits,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27 (4), 455–69.
69.
MarshHerbert W., WenZhonglin, and HauKit-Tai (2006), “Structural Equation Models of Latent Interaction and Quadratic Effects,” in Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course, HancockGregory R., and MuellerRalph O., eds. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, 225–65.
70.
McGuireJean B., SundgrenAlison, and SchneeweisThomas (1988), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance,”Academy of Management Journal, 31 (4), 854–72.
McWilliamsAbagail, and SiegelDonald (2001), “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective,”Academy of Management Review, 26 (1), 117–27.
73.
MitchellVincent-Wayne (1995), “Organizational Risk Perception and Reduction: A Literature Review,”British Journal of Management, 6 (2), 115–33.
74.
OliverChristine (1990), “Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions,”Academy of Management Review, 15 (2), 241–65.
75.
OrlitzkyMarc, SchmidtFrank L., and RynesSara L. (2003), “Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis,”Organization Studies, 24 (3), 403–441.
76.
PelozaJohn, and ShangJingzhi (2011), “How Can Corporate Social Responsibility Activities Create Value for Stakeholders? A Systematic Review,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39 (1), 117–35.
77.
PodsakoffPhilip M., MacKenzieScott B., LeeJeong-Yeon, and PodsakoffNathan P. (2003), “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879–903.
78.
RobinsonStefanie Rosen, IrmakCaglar, and JayachandranSatish (2012), “Choice of Cause in Cause-Related Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 76 (July), 126–39.
79.
SchwartzMark S., and CarrollArchie B. (2008), “Integrating and Unifying Competing and Complementary Frameworks: The Search for a Common Core in the Business and Society Field,”Business and Society, 47 (2), 148–85.
80.
ScottSusanne G., and LaneVicki R. (2000), “A Stakeholder Approach to Organizational Identity,”Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), 43–62.
81.
SenSankar, and BhattacharyaC.B. (2001), “Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility,”Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (May), 225–43.
82.
SenSankar, BhattacharyaC.B., and KorschunDaniel (2006), “The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Strengthening Multiple Stakeholder Relationships: A Field Experiment,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (2), 158–66.
83.
SharmaArun, IyerGopalkrishnan R., MehrotraAnuj, and KrishnanR. (2010), “Sustainability and Business-to-Business Marketing: A Framework and Implications,”Industrial Marketing Management, 39 (2), 330–41.
84.
SobelMichael E. (1982), “Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models,”Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312.
85.
TateWendy L., EllramLisa M., and KirchoffJon F. (2010), “Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: A Thematic Analysis Related to Supply Chain Management,”Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46 (1), 19–44.
86.
TurbanDaniel B., and GreeningDaniel W. (1997), “Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees,”Academy of Management Journal, 40 (3), 658–72.
87.
UlagaWolfgang, and EggertAndreas (2006), “Value-Based Differentiation in Business Relationships: Gaining and Sustaining Key Supplier Status,”Journal of Marketing, 70 (January), 119–36.
88.
VaalandTerje I., HeideMorten, and GrønhaugKjell (2008), “Corporate Social Responsibility: Investigating Theory and Research in the Marketing Context,”European Journal of Marketing, 42 (9/10), 927–53.
89.
Van de VenBert, and JeurissenRonald (2005), “Competing Responsibly,”Business Ethics Quarterly, 15 (2), 299–317.
90.
Van KnippenbergDaan, and SleebosEd (2006), “Organizational Identification Versus Organizational Commitment: Self-Definition, Social Exchange, and Job Attitudes,”Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27 (5), 571–84.
91.
VlachosPavlos A., TsamakosArgiris, VrechopoulosAdam P., and AvramidisPanagiotis K. (2009), “Corporate Social Responsibility: Attributions, Loyalty, and the Mediating Role of Trust,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37 (2), 170–80.
92.
WagnerTillmann, LutzRichard J., and WeitzBarton A. (2009), “Corporate Hypocrisy: Overcoming the Threat of Inconsistent Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions,”Journal of Marketing, 73 (November), 77–91.
93.
WoodDonna J., and JonesRaymond E. (1995), “Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance,”International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3 (3), 229–67.
94.
ZeithamlValarie A., BerryLeonard L., and ParasuramanA. (1996), “The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality,”Journal of Marketing, 60 (April), 31–46.
95.
ZhangRan, ZhuJigao, YueHeng, and ZhuChunyan (2010), “Corporate Philanthropic Giving, Advertising Intensity, and Industry Competition Level,”Journal of Business Ethics, 94 (1), 39–52.
