AdairJohn G., and VohraNeharika (2003), “The Explosion of Knowledge, References, and Citations,”American Psychologist, 58(January), 15–23.
2.
AldersonWroe (1957), Marketing Behavior and Executive Action: A Functionalist Approach to Marketing.Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
3.
AldersonWroe (1965), Dynamic Marketing Behavior: A Functionalist Theory of Marketing.Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
4.
BatraRajeev, and VanhonackerWilfried R. (1988), “Falsifying Laboratory Results Through Field Tests: A Time-Series Methodology and Some Results,”Journal of Business Research, 16(June), 281–300.
5.
BaumgartnerHans, and PietersRik (2003), “The Structural Influence of Marketing Journals: A Citation Analysis of the Discipline and Its Subareas Over Time,”Journal of Marketing, 67(April), 123–39.
6.
BordenNeil H. (1946), “Advertising Branded Parts to Consumers,”Harvard Business Review, 25(Autumn), 129–44.
7.
EatonJohn P., WardJames C., KumarAjith, and ReingenPeter H. (1999), “Structural Analysis of Co-Author Relationships and Author Productivity in Selected Outlets for Consumer Behavior Research,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(1), 39–59.
8.
HargensLowell L. (2000), “Using the Literature: Reference Networks, Reference Contexts, and the Social Structure of Scholarship,”American Sociological Review, 65(December), 846–65.
9.
HultG. Tomas, NeeseWilliam T., and Edward BashawR. (1997), “Faculty Perceptions of Marketing Journals,”Journal of Marketing Education, 19(Spring), 37–52.
10.
HuntShelby D. (2002), Foundations of Marketing Theory.Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
11.
KoojaroenprasitNarong, WeinsteinArt, JohnsonWilliam C., and RemingtonDavid O. (1998), “Marketing Journal Rankings Revisited: Research Findings and Academic Implications,”Marketing Education Review, 8(Spring), 95–102.
12.
PetersonRobert (2002), “Marketing is … a Body of Knowledge,” in Essays by Distinguished Marketing Scholars of the Society for Marketing Advances, WoodsideA.G., and MooreE.M., eds. Boston: JAI Press, 139–69.
13.
PietersRik, BaumgartnerHans, VermuntJeroen, and BijmoltTammo (1999), “Importance and Similarity in the Evolving Citation Network of the International Journal of Research in Marketing,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16(June), 113–27.
14.
PowersThomas L., SwanJohn E., BosTheodore, and PattonJohn Frank (1998), “Career Research Productivity Patterns of Marketing Academicians,”Journal of Business Research, 42(May), 75–86.
15.
PriceDerek, De SollaJ. (1965), “Networks of Scientific Papers,”Science, 149(July 30), 510–15.
16.
RudnerRichard (1966), Philosophy of Social Science.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17.
ShethJagdish N., and SisodiaRajendra S. (1999), “Revisiting Marketing's Lawlike Generalizations,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(Winter), 71–87.
18.
SmalleyRoger, and FraedrichJohn (1995), “Aldersonian Functionalism: An Enduring Theory in Marketing,”Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 3(Fall), 1–16.
19.
SummersJohn O. (2001), “Guidelines for Conducting Research and Publishing in Marketing: From Conceptualization Through the Review Process,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(Fall), 405–415.
20.
SuttonRobert I., and StawBarry M. (1995), “What Theory is Not,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(September), 371–84.
21.
Theoharakis, Vasilis and Andrew Hirst (2002), “Perceptual Differences of Marketing Journals: A Worldwide Perspective,”Marketing Letters, 13(4), 389–402.
22.
Thomson, Keith Stewart (1994), “Scientific Publishing: An Embarrassment of Riches,”American Scientist, 82(November-December), 508–511.
23.
WilkieWilliam L., and MooreElizabeth S. (2003), “Scholarly Research in Marketing: Exploring the ‘4 Eras’ of Thought Development,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 22(Fall), 116–46.
24.
WinerRussell S. (1999), “Experimentation in the 21st Century: The Importance of External Validity,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(Summer), 349–58.