Managing Conflicting Stakeholder Interests: An Exploratory Case Analysis of the Formulation of Corporate Social Responsibility Standards in the Netherlands
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2010
Managing Conflicting Stakeholder Interests: An Exploratory Case Analysis of the Formulation of Corporate Social Responsibility Standards in the Netherlands
The formulation of corporate social responsibility standards must deal with conflicting interests among stakeholders. The standards formulation process occurs at the junction between market stakeholders and special interest groups, which implies that it may help increase understanding of the marketing–society relationship. Drawing on the power and urgency dimensions of stakeholder identification theory and decision process analysis, this study examines four case studies pertaining to animal welfare issues in food marketing. The standards formulation processes contain control mechanisms that solve the potential conflicts between stakeholders by constraining commercial and/or special interests. These mechanisms vary in the degree to which discussion centers on the relationship between commercial and special interests, the presence of new parties that may alter the negotiations, the stage at which special interest groups become involved in the process, and the extent to which commercial and special interests constrain each other. The findings have critical implications for how companies and their stakeholders can organize the process of formulating corporate social responsibility standards.
BhattacharyaC.B., and KorschunDaniel (2008), “Stakeholder Marketing: Beyond the Four Ps and the Customer,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 27(Spring), 113–16.
2.
BrownTom J., and DacinPeter A. (1997), “The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Reponses,”Journal of Marketing, 61(January), 68–84.
3.
CaponNoel, FarleyJohn U., and HulbertJames (1975), “Pricing and Forecasting in an Oligopoly Firm,”Journal of Management Studies, 12(1-2), 133–56.
4.
CaponNoel, and HulbertJames (1975), “Decision System Analysis in Industrial Marketing,”Industrial Marketing Management, 4(2), 143–60.
5.
ClarksonMax B.E. (1995), “A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance,”Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.
6.
CyertRichard M., and MarchJames G. ([1963] 1992), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
DrumwrightMinette E. (1994), “Socially Responsible Organizational Buying: Environmental Concern as a Noneconomic Buying Criteria,”Journal of Marketing, 60(July), 1–19.
8.
EisenhardtKathleen M. (1989), “Building Theories from Case Study Research,”Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–50.
9.
FarleyJohn U., HowardJohn A., and HulbertJames M. (1971), “An Organizational Approach to an Industrial Marketing Information System,”Sloan Management Review, 13(Fall), 35–54.
10.
FarleyJohn U., HulbertJames M., and WeinsteinDavid (1980), “Price Setting and Volume Planning by Two European Industrial Companies: A Study and Comparison of Decision Processes,”Journal of Marketing, 44(Winter), 46–54.
11.
GrewalRajdeep, and DharwadkarRavi (2002), “The Role of the Institutional Environment in Marketing Channels,”Journal of Marketing, 66(July), 82–97.
12.
GrossmanGene M., and HelpmanElhanan (2001), Special Interest Politics.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
HandelmanJay M., and ArnoldStephen J. (1999), “Marketing Actions with a Social Dimension: Appeals to the Institutional Environment,”Journal of Marketing, 63(July), 33–48.
14.
HartStuart L., and SharmaSanjay (2004), “Engaging Fringe Stakeholders for Competitive Imagination,”Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 7–18.
15.
HealyMike, and IlesJennifer (2002), “The Establishment and Enforcement of Codes,”Journal of Business Ethics, 39(1-2), 117–24.
16.
HenriquesIrene, and SadorskyPerry (1999), “The Relationship Between Environmental Commitment and Managerial Perceptions of Stakeholder Importance,”Academy of Management Journal, 20(2), 404–437.
17.
HulbertJames M., FarleyJohn U., and HowardJohn A. (1972), “Information Processing and Decision Making in Marketing Organizations,”Journal of Marketing Research, 9(February), 75–77.
18.
IngenbleekPaul T.M., BinnekampMenno, and GoddijnSilvia (2007), “Setting Standards for CSR: A Comparative Case Study on Criteria-Formulating Organizations,”Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 539–48.
19.
KambewaEmma, IngenbleekPaul, and van TilburgAad (2008), “Improving Income Positions of Primary Producers in International Marketing Channels: The Lake Victoria-EU Nile Perch Case,”Journal of Macromarketing, 28(March), 53–67.
20.
KleinJill G., Craig SmithN., and JohnAndrew (2004), “Why We Boycott: Consumer Motivations for Boycott Participation,”Journal of Marketing, 68(July), 92–109.
21.
KolkAns, and van TulderRob (2002), “Child Labor and Multinational Conduct: A Comparison of International Business and Stakeholder Codes,”Journal of Business Ethics, 36(3), 291–301.
22.
LuoXueming, and BhattacharyaC.B. (2006), “Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value,”Journal of Marketing, 70(October), 1–18.
23.
MaignanIsabelle, and FerrellO.C. (2004), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 3–19.
24.
MaignanIsabelle, FerrellO.C., and FerrellLinda (2006), “A Stakeholder Model for Implementing Social Responsibility in Marketing,”European Journal of Marketing, 39(9-10), 956–77.
25.
MaignanIsabelle, and McAlisterDebbie T. (2003), “Socially Responsible Organizational Buying: How Can Stakeholders Dictate Purchasing Policies?”Journal of Macromarketing, 23(2), 78–89.
26.
MeyerJohn W., and RowanBrian (1977), “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony,”American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–63.
27.
MitchellRonald K., AgleBradley R., and WoodDonna J. (1997), “Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who or What Really Counts,”Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–86.
28.
PfefferJ. (1981), Power in Organizations.Marshfield, MA: Pittman.
29.
ReinhardtForest L. (1998), “Environmental Product Differentiation: Implications for Corporate Strategy,”California Management Review, 40(4), 43–73.
30.
RoozenNico, and van der HoffFrans (2001), Fair Trade the Story Behind Max Havelaar Coffee, Oké Bananas and Kuyichi Jeans[in Dutch]. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
31.
SenSankar, and BhattacharyaC.B. (2001), “Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility,”Journal of Marketing Research, 38(May), 225–43.
32.
SenSankar, BhattacharyaC.B., and KorschunDaniel (2006), “The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Strengthening Multiple Stakeholder Relationships: A Field Experiment,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–66.
33.
SenSankar, Gürhan-CanliZeynep, and MorwitzVicki (2001), “Withholding Consumption: A Social Dilemma Perspective on Consumer Boycotts,”Journal of Consumer Research, 28(December), 399–417.
34.
ShrivastavaPaul (1995), “Ecocentric Management for a Risk Society,”Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 118–37.
35.
SinghJagdip, JayantiRama K., KilgoreJean E., AgarwalKokil, and GandarvakottaiRamadesikan R. (2005), “What Goes Around Comes Around: Understanding Trust–Value Dilemmas of Market Relationships,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 24(Spring), 38–62.
36.
CraigSmith N. (2003), “Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How?”California Management Review, 45(4), 52–76.
37.
SuchmanMark C. (1995), “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches,”Academy of Management Review, 20(July), 571–610.
38.
UrbanGlen L. (2005), “Customer Advocacy: A New Era in Marketing?”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 24(Spring), 155–59.
39.
WaddockSandra A., and BodwellCharles (2004), “Managing Responsibility: What Can Be Learned from the Quality Movement,”California Management Review, 47(1), 25–37.
40.
WaddockSandra A., BodwellCharles, and GravesSamuel B. (2002), “Responsibility: The New Business Imperative,”Academy of Management Executive, 16(2), 132–49.
41.
YinR.K. (2003), Case Study Research Design and Methods: Vol. 5. Applied Social Research Methods Series, 3d ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
