The Twilight Envelope: A User-Centered Approach to Describing Roadway Illumination at Night

Abstract

Visual recognition functions, such as acuity and contrast sensitivity, deteriorate rapidly over the declining luminances found during civil twilight. Thus civil twilight, a critical part of the transition between daylight and darkness, represents lighting conditions that may be useful to describe artificial illumination. Automotive headlamps project a three-dimensional beam that ranges from illumination levels comparable to daylight at the vehicle to the dark limit of civil twilight (3.3 lx) at some distance ahead. This twilight envelope is characterized as a distance beyond which foveal visual functions are severely impaired, and thus it provides a general, functional description of the useful extent of the headlamp beam. This user-centered approach to describing illumination is useful for characterizing visibility when driving at night or in other artificially lit environments. This paper discusses the twilight envelope approach and its application to intervehicle variations in headlamp systems. Actual or potential applications of this research include user-centered description of artificial illumination and driver/pedestrian safety education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (1990). A policy on geometric design of highways and streets. Washington, DC: Author.

Commission Internationale de L'Eclariage. (1981). An analytic model for describing the influence of lighting parameters upon visual performance: Volume II. Summary and application guidelines (Publication CIE 19/2.2 [TC-3.1]). Paris: Author.

Farber, E. (1988). Revising the DETECT seeing distance model (SAE Tech. Paper Series No. 880716). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.

Graham, C. H. (1965). Vision and visual perception. New York: Wiley.

Jackson, G. R. , Owsley, C. , Cordle, E. P. , & Finley, C. D. (1998). Aging and scotopic sensitivity. Vision Research, 38, 3655–3662.

Leibowitz, H. W. (1987). Ambient illuminance during twilight and from the full moon. In Committee on Vision, Working Group on Night Vision (Eds.), Night vision: Current research and future directions (pp. 19–22). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Leibowitz, H. W. , & Owens, D. A. (1991). Can normal outdoor activities be carried out during civil twilight? Applied Optics, 30, 3501–3503.

Leibowitz, H. W. , Owens, D. A. , & Tyrrell, R. A. (1998). The assured clear distance ahead rule: Implications for nighttime traffic safety and the law. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30, 93–99.

Leibowitz, H. W. , & Post, R. B. (1982). The two modes of processing concept and some implications. In J. Beck (Ed.), Organization and representation in perception (pp. 343–363). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

10.

Leibowitz, H. W. , Rodemer, C. S. , & Dichgans, J. (1979). The independence of dynamic spatial orientation from luminance and refractive error. Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 75–79.

11.

Minahan, D. J. , & O'Day, J. (1977). Fatal car-into-truck/trailer underride collisions: The HSRI research review (Vol. 8, No. 3). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Highway Safety Research Institute.

12.

Moore, D. W. (1998). Headlamp history and harmonization (Tech. Report No. UMTRI-98-21). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.

13.

Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.

14.

Olson, P. L. (1996). Forensic aspects of driver perception and response. Tucson, AZ: Lawyers and Judges.

15.

Owens, D. A. (1999, January). The twilight concept vs. a computer model: Alternate approaches to understanding visibility. Presented at the 78th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

16.

Owens, D. A. , & Andre, J. T. (1996). Selective visual degradation and the older driver. IATSS Research, 20, 57–66.

17.

Owens, D. A. , Francis, E. L. , & Leibowitz, H. W. (1989). Visibility distance with headlights: A functional approach (SAE Tech. Paper Series No. 890684). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.

18.

Owens, D. A. , Helmers, G. , & Sivak, M. (1993). Intelligent vehicle highway systems: A call for user centered design. Ergonomics, 36, 363–369.

19.

Owens, D. A. , & Sivak, M. (1996). Differentiation of visibility and alcohol as contributors to twilight road fatalities. Human Factors, 38, 680–689.

20.

Owens, D. A. , & Tyrrell, R. A. (1999). Effects of luminance, blur, and age on nighttime visual guidance: A test of the selective degradation hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 115–128.

21.

Rumar, K. (1974). Dirty headlights: Frequency and visibility effects. Ergonomics, 17, 529–533.

22.

Sivak, M. , Flannagan, M. , Kojima, S. , & Traube, E. C. (1997). A market-weighted description of low-beam headlighting patterns in the U.S. (Tech. Report No. UMTRI-97--37). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.

23.

Sivak, M. , Helmers, G. , Owens, D. A. , & Flannagan, M. (1992). Evaluation of proposed low-beam headlighting patterns (Tech. Report No. UMTRI-92-14). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.

24.

Trevarthen, C. B. (1968). Two mechanisms of vision in primates. Psychologische Forschung, 31, 229–337.