Ecological interface design (EID) is a theoretical framework for designing human-computer interfaces for complex sociotechnical systems. Its primary aim is to support knowledge workers in adapting to change and novelty. This literature review shows that in situations requiring problem solving, EID improves performance when compared with current design approaches in industry. EID has been applied to industry-scale problems in a broad variety of application domains (e.g., process control, aviation, computer network management, software engineering, medicine, command and control, and information retrieval) and has consistently led to the identification of new information requirements. An experimental evaluation of EID using a full-fidelity simulator with professional workers has yet to be conducted, although some are planned. Several significant challenges remain as obstacles to the confident use of EID in industry. Promising paths for addressing these outstanding issues are identified. Actual or potential applications of this research include improving the safety and productivity of complex sociotechnical systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bernstein, N. A. (1996). On dexterity and its development. In M. L. Latash & M. T. Turvey (Eds.), Dexterity and its development (pp. 1–244). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
Bisantz, A. M., & Vicente, K. J. (1994). Making the abstraction hierarchy concrete. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 83–117.
3.
Burns, C. M. (2000a). Navigation strategies with ecological displays. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52, 111–129.
4.
Burns, C. M. (2000b). Putting it all together: Improving display integration in ecological displays. Human Factors, 42, 226–241.
5.
Burns, C. M., Barsalou, E., Handler, C., Kuo, J., & Harrigan, K. (2000). A work domain analysis for network management. In Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress (Vol. 1, pp. 469–472). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
6.
Burns, C. M., Bryant, D. J., & Chalmers, B. A. (2000). A work domain model to support shipboard command and control. In Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernertics (pp. 2228–2233). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
7.
Chéry, S., Vicente, K. J., & Farrell, P. (1999). Perceptual control theory and ecological interface design: Lessons learned from the CDU. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting (pp. 389–393). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
8.
Christoffersen, K., Hunter, C. N., & Vicente, K. J. (1996). A longitudinal study of the effects of ecological interface design on skill acquisition. Human Factors, 38, 523–541.
9.
Christoffersen, K., Hunter, C. N., & Vicente, K. J. (1997). A longitudinal study of the effects of ecological interface design on fault management performance. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 1, 1–24.
10.
Christoffersen, K., Hunter, C. N., & Vicente, K. J. (1998). A longitudinal study of the impact of ecological interface design on deep knowledge. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 48, 729–762.
11.
Dinadis, N., & Vicente, K. J. (1996). Ecological interface design for a power plant feedwater subsystem. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 43, 266–277.
12.
Dinadis, N., & Vicente, K. J. (1999). Designing functional visualizations for aircraft system status displays. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9, 241–269.
13.
Flach, J., Hancock, P., Caird, J., & Vicente, K. J. (1995). Global perspectives on the ecology of human-machine systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
Furukawa, H., & Inagaki, T. (in press). A graphical interface design for supporting human-machine cooperation: Representing automation's intentions by means-ends relations. In Proceedings of the 8th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA Symposium on Analysis, Design, and Evaluation of Human-Machine Systems. Kassel, Germany: International Federation of Automatic Control.
15.
Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
16.
Goodstein, L. P. (1985). Functional alarming and information retrieval (Risø-M-2511). Roskilde, Denmark: Risø National Laboratory, Electronics Department.
17.
Guerlain, S. A., Smith, P. J., Obradovich, J. H., Rudmann, S., Strohm, P., Smith, J. W., Svispati, J., & Sachs, L. (1999). Interactive critiquing as a form of decision support: An empirical evaluation. Human Factors, 41, 72–89.
18.
Hajdukiewicz, J. R., & Vicente, K. J. (2000). Ecological interface design: Adaptation to dynamic perturbations. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference on Human Interaction with Complex Systems (pp. 69–73). Urbana: University of Illinois.
19.
Hajdukiewicz, J. R., Vicente, K. J., Doyle, D. J., Milgram, P., & Burns, C. M. (2001). Modeling a medical environment: An ontology for integrated medical informatics design. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 62, 79–99.
20.
Ham, D. H., & Yoon, W. C. (2001a). Design of information content and layout for process control based on goal-means domain analysis. Cognition, Technology and Work, 3, 205–223.
21.
Ham, D. H., & Yoon, W. C. (2001b). The effects of presenting functionally abstracted information in fault diagnosis tasks. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 73, 103–119.
22.
Hansen, J. P. (1995). Representation of system invariants by optical invariants in configural displays for process control. In P. Hancock, J. Flach, J. Caird, & K. J. Vicente (Eds.), Local applications of the ecological approach to human-machine systems(pp. 208–233). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
Howie, D. E., & Vicente, K. J. (1998). Making the most of ecological interface design: The role of self-explanation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 49, 651–674.
24.
Hunter, C. N., Vicente, K. J., & Tanabe, F. (1996). Can “theoretical” training improve fault management performance? In Proceedings of the 1996 American Nuclear Society International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human-Machine Interface Technologies (pp. 683–690). LaGrange Park, IL: American Nuclear Society.
25.
Itoh, J., Sakuma, A., & Monta, K. (1995). An ecological interface for supervisory control of BWR nuclear power plants. Control Engineering Practice, 3, 231–239.
26.
Jamieson, G. A., & Vicente, K. J. (2001). Ecological interface design for petrochemical applications: Supporting operator adaptation, continuous learning, and distributed, collaborative work. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 25, 1055–1074.
27.
Janzen, M. E., & Vicente, K. J. (1998). Attention allocation within the abstraction hierarchy. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 48, 521–545.
28.
Kuo, J. (2001). Applying ecological interface design to network performance management. Unpublished M.A.Sc. thesis, University of Waterloo, Department of Systems Design Engineering, Waterloo, Canada.
29.
Kuo, J., & Burns, C. M. (2000). Work domain analysis for virtual private networks. In Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (pp. 1972–1977). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
30.
Lee, J. D., & Sanquist, T. F. (1995). Review of ecological interface design research: Applications of the design philosophy and results of empirical evaluations (Tech. Report). Seattle, WA: Battelle.
31.
Leveson, N. G. (2000). Intent specifications: An approach to building human-centered specifications. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26, 15–35.
32.
Lewis, C., & Warton, C. (1997). Cognitive walkthroughs. In M. G. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & P. V. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (2nd ed., pp. 717–732). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
33.
Mark, L. S., & Dainoff, M. J. (1988). An ecological framework for ergonomic research: The chair as a case in point. Innovation, 7(2), 8–11.
34.
Mumaw, R. J., Woods, D. D., & Eastman, M. C. (1992). Interim report on techniques and principles for computer-based display of data (STC Report 92-1SJ4-CHICR-R1). Pittsburgh, PA: Westinghouse Science and Technology Center.
35.
Norros, L. (1996). System disturbances as springboard for development of operators' expertise. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 159–176). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Olsson, G., & Lee, P. L. (1994). Effective interfaces for process operators - A prototype. Journal of Process Control, 4, 99–107.
37.
Pask, G., & Scott, B. C. (1972). Learning styles and individual competence. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 4, 217–253.
38.
Pawlak, W. S., & Vicente, K. J. (1996). Inducing effective operator control through ecological interface design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44, 653–688.
39.
Pedersen, C. R., & Lind, M. (1999). Conceptual design of industrial process displays. Ergonomics, 42, 1531–1548.
40.
Pejtersen, A. M. (1992). The Book House: An icon based database system for fiction retrieval in public libraries. In B. Cronin (Ed.), The marketing of library and information services 2 (pp. 572–591). London: ASLIB.
41.
Powers, W. T. (1973). Behavior: The control of perception. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine DeGruyter.
42.
Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-13, 257–266.
43.
Rasmussen, J. (1985). The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decisionmaking and system management. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-15, 234–243.
44.
Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M., & Goodstein, L. P. (1994). Cognitive systems engineering. New York: Wiley.
45.
Rasmussen, J., & Vicente, K. J. (1989). Coping with human errors through system design: Implications for ecological interface design. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 31, 517–534.
46.
Reising, D. V. C., & Sanderson, P. M. (1998). Designing displays under ecological interface design: Towards operationalizing semantic mappings. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (pp. 372–376). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
47.
Reising, D. V. C., & Sanderson, P. M. (2000a). Testing the impact of instrumentation location and reliability on ecological interface design: Control performance. In Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress (Vol. 1, pp. 124–127). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
48.
Reising, D. V. C., & Sanderson, P. M. (2000b). Testing the impact of instrumentation location and reliability on ecological interface design: Fault diagnosis performance. In Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress (Vol. 3, pp. 591–594). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
49.
Reising, D. V. C., Sanderson, P. M., Jones, B. G., Moray, N., & Rasmussen, J. (1998). A direct perception display for rulebased behavior: Supporting power plant startup with a “lattice” display. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (pp. 224–228). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
50.
Roth, E. M., Gualtieri, J., Easter, J., Potter, S. S., & Elm, W. C. (2000, May). Bridging the gap between cognitive analysis and cognitive engineering. Paper presented at the 5th Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making, Stockholm, Sweden.
51.
Roth, E. M., Lin, L., Thomas, V. M., Kerch, S., Kenney, S. J., & Sugibayashi, N. (1998). Supporting situation awareness of individuals and teams using group view displays. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (pp. 244–248). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
52.
Rouse, W. B. (1991). Design for success: A human-centered approach to designing successful products and systems. New York: Wiley.
53.
Sanderson, P. M., Eggleston, R., Skilton, W., & Cameron, S. (1999). Work domain analysis workbench: Supporting cognitive work analysis as a systematic process. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting (pp. 323–327). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
54.
Sharp, T. D., & Helmicki, A. J. (1998). The application of the ecological interface design approach to neonatal intensive care medicine. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (pp. 350–354). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
55.
Stoffregen, T. A., & Bardy, B. G. (2001). On specification and the senses. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 195–213.
56.
Torenvliet, G. L., Jamieson, G. A., & Vicente, K. J. (2000). Making the most of ecological interface design: The role of individual differences. Applied Ergonomics, 31, 395–408.
57.
van Paassen, R. (1995). New visualization techniques for industrial process control. In Proceedings of the 6th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA Symposium on Analysis, Design, and Evaluation of Man-Machine Systems (pp. 457–462). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
58.
Vicente, K. J. (1992). Memory recall in a process control system: A measure of expertise and display effectiveness. Memory and Cognition, 20, 356–373.
59.
Vicente, K. J. (1996). Improving dynamic decision making in complex systems through ecological interface design: A research overview. System Dynamics Review, 12, 251–279.
60.
Vicente, K. J. (1999). Cognitive work analysis: Toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61.
Vicente, K. J. (2001). Cognitive engineering research at Risø from 1962--1979. In E. Salas (Ed.), Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research (Vol. 1, pp. 1–57). New York: Elsevier.
62.
Vicente, K. J., Christoffersen, K., & Pereklita, A. (1995). Supporting operator problem solving through ecological interface design. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-25, 529–545.
63.
Vicente, K. J., & Rasmussen, J. (1990). The ecology of humanmachine systems: II. Mediating “direct perception” in complex work domains. Ecological Psychology, 2, 207–250.
64.
Vicente, K. J., & Rasmussen, J. (1992). Ecological interface design: Theoretical foundations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-22, 589–606.
65.
Watanabe, O. (2001, March). Issues toward practical application of ecological interface to real world. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Ecological Approach to Human Work Interface, Tokai, Japan.
66.
Watson, M., Russell, W. J., & Sanderson, P. (2000). Anesthesia monitoring, alarm proliferation, and ecological interface design. Australian Journal of Information Systems, 7, 109–114.
67.
Wong, W. B. L., Sallis, P. J., & O'Hare, D. (1998). The ecological approach to interface design: Applying the abstraction hierarchy to intentional domains. In Proceedings of the 8th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction OzCHI'98 (pp. 144–150). Adelaide, Australia: IEEE Computer Society.
68.
Woods, D. D. (1984). Visual momentum: A concept to improve the cognitive coupling of person and computer. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 21, 229–244.
69.
Woods, D. D., Elm, W. C., & Easter, J. R. (1986). The disturbance board concept for intelligent support of fault management tasks. In Proceedings of the International Topical Meeting on Advances in Human Factors in Nuclear Power Systems. LaGrange Park, IL: ANS.
70.
Xu, W., Dainoff, M. J., & Mark, L. S. (1999). Facilitate complex search tasks in hypertext by externalizing functional properties of a work domain. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 11, 201–229.
71.
Yamaguchi, Y., & Tanabe, F. (2000). Creation of interface system for nuclear reactor operation: Practical implication of implementing EID concept on large complex system. In Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress (Vol. 3, pp. 571–574). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
72.
Zhang, J. (1996). A representational analysis of relational information displays. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 59–74.
