The effect of a concurrent auditory task on visual search was investigated using an image-flicker technique. Participants were undergraduate university students with normal or corrected-to-normal vision who searched for changes in images of driving scenes that involved either driving-related (e.g., traffic light) or driving-unrelated (e.g., mailbox) scene elements. The results indicated that response times were significantly slower if the search was accompanied by a concurrent auditory task. In addition, slower overall responses to scenes involving driving-unrelated changes suggest that the underlying process affected by the concurrent auditory task is strategic in nature. These results were interpreted in terms of their implications for using a cellular telephone while driving. Actual or potential applications of this research include the development of safer in-vehicle communication devices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alm, H., & Nilsson, L. (1994). Changes in driver behaviour as a function of handsfree mobile phones --- a simulator study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26, 441–451.
2.
Alm, H., & Nilsson, L. (1995). The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 27, 707–715.
3.
Baddeley, A. D., Logie, R., Nimmo-Smith, I., & Brerefon, N. (1985). Components of fluent reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 119–131.
4.
Briem, V., & Hedman, L. R. (1995). Behavioural effects of mobile telephone use during simulated driving. Ergonomics, 38, 2536–2562.
5.
Brookhuis, K. A., de Vries, G., & de Waard, D. (1991). The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 23, 309–316.
6.
Brown, I., Tickner, A. H., & Simmonds, D. C. (1969). Interference between concurrent tasks of driving and telephoning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 419–424.
7.
Crundall, D. E., & Underwood, G. (1998). Effects of experience and processing demands on visual information acquisition in drivers. Ergonomics, 41, 448–458.
8.
Crundall, D. E., Underwood, G., and Chapman, P. (1999). Driving experience and the functional field of view. Perception, 28, 1075–1087.
9.
Goodman, M. J., Tijerina L., Bents, F. D., & Wierwille, W. W. (1999). Using cellular telephones in vehicles: Safe or unsafe?Transportation Human Factors, 1, 3–42.
10.
Grimes, J. (1996). Failure to detect changes. In K. Akins (Ed.), Perception (pp. 89–109). New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
Hollingworth, A., Schrock, G., & Henderson, J. M. (2001) Change detection in the flicker paradigm: The role of fixation position within the scene. Memory and Cognition, 29, 296–304.
12.
Jagla, F., Jergelova, M., & Zikmund, V. (1999). Visual fixation and oculomotor evoked potential changes during the divided attention task. Homeostatis, 39, 117–118.
13.
James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
14.
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 9, pp. 187–204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
17.
McKnight, J. A., & McKnight, S. A. (1993). The effect of cellular phone use upon driver attention. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 25, 259–265.
18.
Malmstrom, F. V., Reed, L. E., & Weber, R. J. (1983). Saccadic eye movements during a concurrent auditory task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21(1), 31–34.
19.
Mourant, R. R., & Rockwell, T. H. (1972). Strategies of visual search by novice and experienced drivers. Human Factors, 14, 325–335.
20.
Neisser, U., & Becklen, R. (1975). Selective looking: Attention to visually significant events. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 480–494.
21.
O'Regan, J. K., Deubel, H., Clark, J. J., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Picture changes during blinks: Looking without seeing and seeing without looking. Visual Cognition, 7, 191–201.
22.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.
23.
Recarte, M. A., & Nunes, L. M. (2000). Effects of verbal and spatial-imagery tasks on eye fixations while driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 31–43.
24.
Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J., (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368–373.
25.
Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J., (2000). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across brief interruptions. Visual Cognition, 7, 127–145.
26.
Rock, I., Linnett, C. M., Grant, P., & Mack, A. (1992). Perception without attention: Results of a new method. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 502–534.
27.
Schneider, W., Dumais, S. T., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). Automatic and controlled processing and attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 1B–4). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
28.
Spelke, E. S., Hirst, W. C., & Neisser, U. (1976). Skills of divided attention. Cognition, 4, 215–230.
29.
Summala, H., Lamble, D., & Laakso, M. (1998). Driving experience and perception of the lead car's braking when looking at in-car targets. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30, 401–407.
30.
Summala, H., Nieminen, T., & Punto, M. (1996). Maintaining lane position with peripheral vision during in-vehicle tasks. Human Factors, 38, 442–451.
31.
Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
32.
Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107–141.
33.
Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63–101). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
