Children Using Cellular Phones: The Effects of Shortcomings in User Interface Design

Abstract

Differences in cellular phones' complexity and their impact on children's performance are under study in this experiment. Twenty children (age 9--14 years) solved tasks on two phones that were simulated according to existing models on a PC with a touch screen, holding constant display size, fonts, and colors. Actions were logged and analyzed regarding execution time, detour steps, and specific errors. Results show that children using the Siemens C35i with 25% higher complexity (with regard to number of required production rules) spent double the time solving tasks and undertook three times as many detour steps as children using the less complex Nokia 3210. A detailed analysis of user actions revealed that the number of production rules to be learned fails to account for most difficulties. Instead, ambiguous naming, poor categorization of functions, and unclear functionality of keys undermined performance. Actual or potential applications of this research include guidelines to improve the usability of all devices with small displays and hierarchical menu structures, such as cellular phones.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bay, S. , & Ziefle, M. (2003). Performance on mobile phones: Does it depend on proper cognitive mapping? In D. Harris , V. Duffy , M. Smith , & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Human-centred computing: Cognitive, social and ergonomic aspects (pp. 170–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Bennett, J. L. (1984). Managing to meet usability requirements: Establishing and meeting software development goals. In J. Bennett , & D. Care (Eds.), Visual display terminals: Usability issues and health concerns (pp. 161–184). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

CHIP Online. (2003). Studie: Jedes fünfte Kind telefoniert mobil [Survey: Every fifth child uses mobile phone]. Retrieved November 18, 2003, from http://www.chip.de/news/c_news_ 9670561.html

Dix, A. , Finley, J. , Abowd, G. , & Beal, R. (1998). Human-computer interaction. London: Prentice Hall.

EN ISO 9241-11. (1997). Ergonomische Anforderungen für Bürotätigkeiten mit Bildschirmgeräten: Teil 11. Anforderungen an die Gebrauchstauglichkeit [Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals: Part 11. Guidance on usability] Berlin: Beuth.

Harper, R. (2001). The mobile interface: Old technologies and new arguments. In B. Brown , N. Green , & R. Harper (Eds.), Wireless world: Social and interactional aspects of the mobile age (pp. 207–226). London: Springer.

Kieras, D. , & Polson, P. G. (1985). An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22, 365–394.

Norman, K. L. (1991). The psychology of menu selection. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Stanney, K. M. , & Salvendy, G. (Eds.). (2000). Special issue: Ease and joy of use for complex systems at Siemens. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 279–468.

10.

Ziefle, M. (2002a). The influence of user expertise and phone complexity on performance, ease of use and learnability of different mobile phones. Behaviour and Information Technology, 21, 303–311.

11.

Ziefle, M. (2002b). Usability of menu structures and navigation keys in mobile phones: A comparison of the ease of use in three different brands. In H. Luczak , A. E. Çakir , & G. Çakir (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Scientific Conference on Work with Display Units (pp. 359–361). Berlin: Ergonomic.

12.

Ziefle, M. , & Bay, S. (2004). Mental models of a cellular phone menu: Comparing older and younger novice users. In S. Brewster , & M. Dunlop (Eds.), Mobile human-computer interaction --- Mobile HCI 2004 (pp. 25–37). Berlin: Springer.

13.

Ziefle,M., Bay, S., & Schwade, A. (2004). On keys' meanings and modes: The impact of different key solutions on children's efficiency using a mobile phone. Manuscript submitted for publication.