The effect of hearing protection devices (HPDs) on sound localization was examined in the context of an auditory-cued visual search task. Participants were required to locate and identify a visual target in a field of 5, 20, or 50 visual distractors randomly distributed on the interior surface of a sphere. Four HPD conditions were examined: earplugs, earmuffs, both earplugs and earmuffs simultaneously (double hearing protection), and no hearing protection. In addition, there was a control condition in which no auditory cue was provided. A repeated measures analysis of variance revealed significant main effects of HPD for both search time and head motion data (p < .05), indicating that the degree to which localization is disrupted by HPDs varies with the type of device worn. When both earplugs and earmuffs are worn simultaneously, search times and head motion are more similar to those found when no auditory cue is provided than when either earplugs or earmuffs alone are worn, suggesting that sound localization cues are so severely disrupted by double hearing protection the listener can recover little or no information regarding the direction of sound source origin. Potential applications of this research include high-noise military, aerospace, and industrial settings in which HPDs are necessary but wearing double protection may compromise safety and/or performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abel, S. M., & Armstrong, N. M. (1993). Sound localization with hearing protectors. Journal of Otolaryngology, 22, 357–363.
2.
American National Standards Institute. (1997). Methods for manual pure-tone threshold audiometry (Standard No. ANSI S3.21--1978; reaffirmed 1997). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
American National Standards Institute. (2002). American National Standards methods for measuring the real-ear attenuation of hearing protectors (Standard No. ANSI S12.6-1997; reaffirmed 2002). Washington, DC: Author.
4.
Berger, E. H. (1983). Laboratory attenuation of earmuffs and earplugs both singly and in combination. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 44, 321–329.
5.
Blauert, J. (1969/1970). Sound localization in the median plane. Acustica, 22, 205–213.
6.
Bolia, R. S., D'Angelo, W. R., & McKinley, R. L. (1999). Aurally aided visual search in three-dimensional space. Human Factors, 41, 664–669.
7.
Bolia, R. S., D'Angelo, W. R., Mishler, P. J., & Morris, L. J. (2001). The effects of hearing protectors on auditory localization in azimuth and elevation. Human Factors, 43, 122–128.
8.
Bolia, R. S., & McKinley, R. L. (2000). The effects of hearing protectors on auditory localization: Evidence from audio-visual target acquisition. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 6, 309–319.
9.
Bolia, R. S., & Nelson, W. T. (2001). Assessing patterns of head motion behavior for adapting multisensory interfaces: Qualitative and quantitative analyses, and model specification. In D. Harris (Ed.), Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics (Vol. 5, pp. 109–116). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
10.
Butler, R. A., & Belendiuk, K. (1977). Spectral cues utilized in the localization of sound in the median sagittal plane. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 1264–1269.
11.
Casali, J. G., & Wright, W. H. (1995). Do amplitude-sensitive hearing protectors improve detectibility of vehicle backup alarms in noise? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting (pp. 994–998). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
12.
Gower, D. W., & Casali, J. G. (1994). Speech intelligibility and protective effectiveness of selected active noise reduction and conventional communications headsets. Human Factors, 36, 350–367.
13.
Laroche, C. (1994). Review of the literature on sound source localization and applications to noisy workplaces. Canadian Acoustics/Acoustique Canadienne, 22, 13–18.
14.
Laroche, C., Ross, M.-J., Lefebvre, L., & Larocque, R. (1995). Détermination des caractéristiques acoustiques optimales des alarmes de recul [Determination of optimal acoustical characteristics of evacuation signals] (IRSST Rapport R-117)Montréal, Canada: Institut de recherche en santé et en sécurité du travail du Québec.
15.
Middlebrooks, J. C. (1992). Narrow-band sound localization related to external ear acoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 2607–2624.
16.
Mills, W. A. (1972). Auditory localization. In J. V. Tobias (Ed.), Foundations of modern auditory theory (Vol. 2, pp. 303–348). New York: Academic.
17.
National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health. (1998). Criteria for a recommended standard --- Occupational noise exposure (Publication No. 98-126). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
18.
Noble, W. G. (1981). Earmuffs, exploratory head movements, and horizontal and vertical sound localization. Journal of Auditory Research, 21, 1–12.
19.
Noble, W. G., Byrne, D., & Lepage, B. (1994). Effects on sound localization of configuration and type of hearing impairment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 992–1005.
20.
Noble, W. G., Murray, N., & Waugh, R. (1990). The effect of various hearing protectors on sound localization in the horizontal and vertical planes. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 51, 370–377.
21.
Noble, W. G., & Russell, G. (1972). Theoretical and practical implications of the effects of hearing protection devices on localization ability. Acta Otolaryngologica, 74, 29–36.
22.
Robinson, G. S., & Casali, J. G. (1995). Audibility of reverse alarms under hearing protectors for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Ergonomics, 38, 2281–2299.
23.
Robinson, G. S., & Casali, J. G. (2000). Issues relating to the conduct of empirical research into the detection of auditory stimuli in noise when wearing nontraditional hearing protectors. In Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 3.722–3.725). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
24.
Shaw, E. A. G. (1997). Acoustical features of the human external ear. In R. H. Gilkey, & T. R. Anderson (Eds.), Binaural and spatial hearing in real and virtual environments (pp. 25–47). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
U.S. Air Force. (1994). Hazardous noise program (AFOSH Standard No. 48--19). Washington, DC: Author.
26.
Van Wijngaarden, S. J., & Rots, G. (2001). Balancing speech intelligibility versus sound exposure in selection of personal hearing protection equipment for Chinook aircrews. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 72, 1037–1044.
27.
Vause, N. L., & Grantham, D. W. (1999). Effects of earplugs and protective headgear on auditory localization ability in the horizontal plane. Human Factors, 41, 282–294.
28.
Wagstaff, A. S., & Woxen, O. J. (2001). Double hearing protection and speech intelligibility --- Room for improvement. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 72, 400–404.
29.
Zurek, P. M. (1986). Consequences of conductive auditory impairment for binaural hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80, 466–472.
