Objective: This research was designed to examine the impact of heuristic-based approaches to the acquisition of task-related information on the selection of an optimal alternative during simulated in-flight decision making. Background: The work integrated features of naturalistic and normative decision making and strategies of information acquisition within a computer-based, decision support framework. Method: The study comprised two phases, the first of which involved familiarizing pilots with three different heuristic-based strategies of information acquisition: frequency, elimination by aspects, and majority of confirming decisions. The second stage enabled participants to choose one of the three strategies of information acquisition to resolve a fourth (choice) scenario. Results: The results indicated that task-oriented experience, rather than the information acquisition strategies, predicted the selection of the optimal alternative. It was also evident that of the three strategies available, the elimination by aspects information acquisition strategy was preferred by most participants. Conclusion: It was concluded that task-oriented experience, rather than the process of information acquisition, predicted task accuracy during the decision-making task. It was also concluded that pilots have a preference for one particular approach to information acquisition. Application: Applications of outcomes of this research include the development of decision support systems that adapt to the information-processing capabilities and preferences of users.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ackerman, P. L., & Cianciolo, A. T. (2002). Ability and task constraint determinants of complex task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 194–208.
2.
Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
Barsam, H. F., & Simutis, Z. M. (1984). Computer-based graphics for terrain visualization. Human Factors, 26, 659–665.
4.
Cats-Baril, W. L. (1988). Designing decision support systems for human error reduction: The need to address information distortion. In B.A. Sayers (Ed.), Human factors and decision-making (pp. 256–269). London: Elsevier.
5.
Cellier, J.-M., Eyrolle, H., & Marine, C. (1997). Expertise in dynamic environments. Ergonomics, 40, 28–50.
6.
Christensen-Szalanski, J. J., & Fobian Willham, C. (1991). The hindsight bias: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 147–168.
7.
Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Why skills cannot be represented by rules. In E. Sharley (Ed.), Advances in cognitive science 1 (pp. 315–335). Chichester, UK: Ellis Harwood.
8.
Fischhoff, B., & Beyth, R. (1975). “I knew it would happen”: Remembered probabilities of once future things. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 1–16.
9.
Freer, M., & Wiggins, M. W. (2004). In-flight decision making [Computer software]. Sydney, Australia: Marcs Auditory Laboratories.
10.
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
Hammond, K. R., Hamm, R. M., Grassia, J., & Pearson, T. (1987). Direct comparison of the efficacy of intuitive and analytical cognition in expert judgment. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 17, 753–770.
12.
Hersh, M. A. (1999). Sustainable decision-making: The role of decision support systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 29, 395–408.
13.
Hoc, J.-M., Amalberti, R., & Boreham, N. (1995). Human operator expertise in diagnosis, decision-making, and time management. In J.-M. Hoc, P. C. Cacciabue, & E. Hollnagel (Eds.), Expertise and technology (pp. 19–42). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
Juslin, P., Jones, S., Olsson, H., & Winman, A. (2003). Cue abstraction and exemplar memory in categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 924–941.
15.
Kashihara, A., Kinshuk, Oppermann, R., Rashev, R., & Simm, H. (2000). A cognitive load reduction approach to exploratory learning and its application to an interactive simulation-based learning system. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9, 253–276.
16.
Klein, G. A. (1989). Recognition-primed decisions (RPD). Advances in Man-Machine Systems, 5, 47–92.
17.
Klein, G. A. (1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
Paquette, L., & Kida, T. (1988). The effect of decision strategy and task complexity on decision performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 128–142.
19.
Patel, V. L., & Groen, G. J. (1991). The general and specific nature of medical expertise: A critical look. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise (pp. 93–125). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision-maker. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1997). The adaptive decision-maker: Effort and accuracy in choice. In W. M. Goldstein & R. M. Hogarth (Eds.), Research on judgement and decision-making (pp. 181–204). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Prince, C., Härtel, C., & Salas, E. (1993). Aeronautical decision-making and consistency of crew behaviors. In R. S. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 248–251). Columbus: Ohio State University.
23.
Sargent, T. A., Kay, M. G., & Sargent, R. G. (1997). Methodology for optimally designing console panels for use by a single operator. Human Factors, 39, 389–409.
24.
Sarter, N. B. (2000). The need for multisensory interfaces in support of effective attention allocation in highly dynamic event-driven domains: The case of cockpit automation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 10, 231–245.
25.
Scallen, S. F., & Hancock, P. A. (2001). Implementing adaptive function allocation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11, 197–221.
26.
Simnett, R. (1996). The effect of information selection, information processing, and task complexity on predictive accuracy of auditors. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 21, 699–719.
27.
Singh, D. T. (1998). Incorporating cognitive aids into decision support systems: The case of the strategy executing process. Decision Support Systems, 24, 145–163.
28.
Wiggins, M. W. (1997). Expertise and cognitive skills development for ab-initio pilots. In R. A. Telfer & P. J. Moore (Eds.), Aviation training: Learners, instruction and organisation (pp. 54–66). Aldershot, UK: Avebury Aviation.
29.
Wiggins, M. W., & O'Hare, D. (1995). Expertise in aeronautical weather-related decision-making: A cross-sectional analysis of general aviation pilots. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 304–319.
30.
Wiggins, M. W., & O'Hare, D. (2003a). Expert and novice pilot perceptions of static in-flight images of weather. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 13, 173–187.
31.
Wiggins, M. W., & O'Hare, D.(2003b). Weatherwise: Evaluation of a cue-based training approach for the recognition of deteriorating weather conditions during flight. Human Factors, 45, 337–345.
32.
Woods, D. D. (1988). Coping with complexity: The psychology of human behaviour in complex systems. In L. P. Goodstein, H. B. Andersen, & S. E. Olsen (Eds.), Tasks, errors and mental models (pp. 128–148). London: Taylor & Francis.
