Objective: This study was designed to develop methods for evaluating the gaze behaviors of spotters during air-to-ground search and to compare field-derived measures with previous lab results. Secondary aims were to assess adherence to a prescribed scan path, evaluate search effectiveness, and determine the predictors of task success. Background: Crashed aircraft must be located quickly to minimize loss of life, often requiring visual search from the air. Method: Eye movements were measured in 10 volunteer spotters while they searched from the air for ground targets. Visual acuity, contrast levels, and performance on a lab-based search task were also measured. Results: Results were similar to those of previous lab-based studies of air-to-ground search. Task success could be predicted best from a combination of gaze and laboratory variables, and as in previous research, experience was not one of them. Conclusions: In both lab and field research, performance is poor. Improvements in air search and rescue success will depend upon improvements in training, the refinement of scan tactics, changes to the task methods or environment, or modifications to parameters of the search exercise. Application: Spotters were unable to reliably search their assigned area, which has implications for the current search training program and in-the-air protocol.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Chapman, P., Underwood, G., & Roberts, K. (2002). Visual search patterns in trained and untrained novice drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 5,157-167.
2.
Christopher, G., & Fournier, P. (1993). Probability of detection in SAREX 93 (ATGOR Working Paper 15/93). Canadian Forces Base, Trenton, Astra, Ontario: Air Transport Group Operational Research.
3.
Crundall, D., & Underwood, G. (1998). Effects of experience and processing demands on visual information acquisition in drivers. Ergonomics, 41, 448-458.
4.
Lindberg, T., & Nasanen, R. (2003). The effect of icon spacing and size on the speed of icon processing in the human visual system. Displays, 24, 111-120.
5.
Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-outI. Role of features. Memory and Cognition, 22, 657-672.
6.
Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1996). Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 977-991.
7.
Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (2000). Priming of pop-out: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection. Visual Cognition, 7, 571-595.
8.
Maxwell, S.E., & Delaney, H.D. (2004). Designing experiments and analyzing data (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
Mourant, R., & Rockwell, T. (1972). Strategies of visual search by novice and experienced drivers. Human Factors, 14, 325-335.
10.
Owsley, C., Ball, K., Sloane, M., Roenker, D., & Bruni, J. (1991). Visual/cognitive correlates of vehicle accidents in older drivers. Psychology and Aging, 6, 403-415.
11.
Pedhazur, E.J., & Schmelkin, L.P. (1991). Measurement, design and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Poisson, M.E., & Wilkinson, F. (1992). Distractor ratio and grouping processes in visual conjunction search. Perception, 21, 21-38.
13.
Reingold, E.M., Charness, N., Pomplun, M., & Stampe, D.M. (2001). Visual span in expert chess players: Evidence from eye movements. Psychological Science, 12, 48-55.
14.
Saunders, P.H. (1987). Operational research studies relating to probability of detection and whereabouts for Canadian search and rescue operations (ATGOR Staff Note 4/87). Canadian Forces Base, Trenton, Astra, Ontario: Air Transport Group Operational Research.
Scialfa, C.T., & Joffe, K.M. (1998). Response times and eye movements in feature and conjunction search as a function of target eccentricity. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 1067-1082.
17.
Shen, J., Reingold, E.M., & Pomplun, M. (2000). Distractor ratio influences patterns of eye movements during visual search. Perception, 29, 241-250.
18.
Stager, P. (1974). Visual search capability in search and rescue (SAR) (DCIEM Tech. Rep. 75-X11). National Defence Headquarters, Ottawa, Ontario: Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine.
19.
Stager, P. (1986). Visual detection probabilities for search and rescue (DCIEM Final Rep. 86-04582). National Defence Headquarters, Ottawa, Ontario: Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine.
20.
Stager, P., &Angus, R. (1975). Eye-movements and related performance in SAR visual search (DCIEM Tech. Rep. 75-X11). National Defence Headquarters, Ottawa, Ontario: Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine.
21.
Stager, P., & Angus, R. (1978). Locating crash site in simulated air-to-ground visual search. Human Factors, 20, 453-466.
22.
Stager, P., & Hameluck, D. (1986). Contrast sensitivity and visual detection in search and rescue (DCIEM Final Rep. 86-04582). National Defence Headquarters, Ottawa, Ontario: Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine.
23.
Taylor, I.W., & Mack, C.I. (1988). A study of probability of detection using the 1988 search and rescue exercise (ATGOR Staff Note 6/88). Canadian Forces Base, Trenton, Astra, Ontario: Air Transport Group Operational Research.
24.
Theeuwes, J. (1996). Visual search at intersections: An eye-movement analysis. InA. G. Gale, I. D. Brown, C. M. Haslegrave , & S. P. Taylor (Eds.), Vision in vehicles - V (pp. 125-134). Amsterdam: Elsevier Sciences.
25.
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A., Hahn, S., Irwin, D., & Zelinsky, G. (1999). Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1595-1608.
26.
Treisman, A.M., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459-478.
27.
Underwood, G., Chapman, P., Bowden, K., & Crundall, D. (2002). Visual search while driving: Skill and awareness during inspection of the scene. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 5, 87-97.
28.
Underwood, G., Crundall, D., & Chapman, P. (2002). Selective searching while driving: The role of experience in hazard detection and general surveillance. Ergonomics, 45, 1-12.
29.
Vigneault, M., & Young, P.J. (1989). A study of detection capability using the 1989 search and rescue exercise (ATGOR Staff Note 6/88). Canadian Forces Base, Trenton, Astra , Ontario: Air Transport Group Operational Research.
30.
Warm, J. (1984). Sustained attention in human performance. New York: Wiley.
31.
Wolfe, J.M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search . Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202-238.
32.
Young, L.R., & Sheena, D. (1975). Survey of eye movement recording methods. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 7, 397-429.
