Objective: The study was done to determine whether thermal comfort (TC), thermal sensation (TS), and subjective factors gauging environmental stress were negatively affected with different cooling methods in men exercising in chemical protective clothing. Background: Previous studies have reported that intermittent regional cooling improved the efficacy of cooling as compared with constant cooling (CC), but no studies have addressed whether there is any improvement in thermal comfort. Methods: Eight male volunteers exercised at moderate work intensity (425 W) in three microclimate cooling tests. The circulating fluid in the cooling garment was provided during exercise to the head (6% body surface area [BSA]), torso (22% BSA), and thighs (44% BSA) and manipulated under three methods: (a) CC, (b) pulsed cooling (PC), and (c) PC activated by mean skin temperature (Tsk) control (PCskin). TC and TS ratings were recorded every 20 min during the 80-min test. Results: TC and TS ratings were not different for PCskin and CC; thus the participants perceived PCskin as being similar to CC. TS was significantly warmer with PC than with PCskin and CC (p < .001). In PCskin, Tsk was significantly higher than in PC and CC (p < .001), and PC skin was rated as being not as warm as PC according to TS. Conclusion: This indicates that the PC skin method was perceived as being as cool as CC and cooler than PC. Application: These findings indicate that the PCskin cooling method is an acceptable alternative to CC and PC based on human perceptions.
Fanger, P.O. (1970). Conditions for thermal comfort: Introduction of a general comfort equation. In J. D. Hardy , A. P. Hagge, & J. A. J. Stolwijk (Eds.), Physiological and behavioral temperature regulation (pp. 152-175). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
4.
Frank, S.M., Raja, S.N., Bulcao, C.F., & Goldstein, D.S. (1999). Relative contribution of core and cutaneous temperatures to thermal comfort and autonomic responses in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology, 86, 1588-1593.
5.
Gagge, A.P., Stolwijk, J.A.J., & Saltin, B. (1969). Comfort and thermal sensations and associated physiological responses during exercise at various ambient temperatures. Environmental Research, 2, 209-229.
6.
Kolka, M.A., Cadarette, B.S., Cheuvront, S.N., Teal, W., Laprise, B., & Stephenson, L.A. (2004). Power savings during intermittent microclimate cooling (IRC) worn under personal protective equipment (PPE) [Abstract]. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 75, B23.
7.
Kolka, M.A., Stephenson, L.A., & Gonzalez, R.R. (1994). Thermoregulation in women during uncompensable heat stress. Journal of Thermal Biology , 19, 315-321.
8.
Marks, L.E., Borg, G., & Ljunggren, G. (1983). Individual differences in perceived exertion assessed by two new methods. Perception and Psychophysics, 34, 280-288.
9.
Nevins, R.J., Gonzalez, R.R., Nishi, Y., N., & Gagge, A.P. (1975). Effect of changes in ambient temperature and level of humidity on comfort and thermal sensations. ASHRAE Transactions, 81(2), 169-182.
10.
Sampson, J.B., Kobrick, J.L., & Johnson, R.F. (1994). Measurement of subjective reactions to extreme environments: The environmental symptoms questionnaire. Military Psychology, 6, 215-233.
11.
Stephenson, L.A., Vernieuw, C.R., Leammukda, W., & Kolka, M.A. (2007). Skin temperature feedback optimizes microclimate cooling. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 78, 377-382.
12.
Stephenson, L.A., Wenger, C.B., O'Donovan, B.H., & Nadel, E.R. (1984). Circadian rhythm in sweating and cutaneous blood flow. American Journal of Physiology, 246(3, Pt. 2), R321-R324.
