Objective: The aim of this study was to extend previous examinations of aviation accidents to include specific aircrew, environmental, supervisory, and organizational factors associated with two types of commercial aviation (air carrier and commuter/ on-demand) accidents using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS). Background: HFACS is a theoretically based tool for investigating and analyzing human error associated with accidents and incidents. Previous research has shown that HFACS can be reliably used to identify human factors trends associated with military and general aviation accidents. Method: Using data obtained from both the National Transportation Safety Board and the Federal Aviation Administration, 6 pilot-raters classified aircrew, supervisory, organizational, and environmental causal factors associated with 1020 commercial aviation accidents that occurred over a 13-year period. Results: The majority of accident causal factors were attributed to aircrew and the environment, with decidedly fewer associated with supervisory and organizational causes. Comparisons were made between HFACS causal categories and traditional situational variables such as visual conditions, injury severity, and regional differences. Conclusion: These data will provide support for the continuation, modification, and/or development of interventions aimed at commercial aviation safety. Application: HFACS provides a tool for assessing human factors associated with accidents and incidents.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baker, S. (1995). Putting "human error" into perspective. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 66, 521.
2.
Baker, S., Lamb, M., Li, G., & Dodd, R. (1993). Human factors in crashes of commuter/on-demand airplanes. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 64, 63-68.
3.
Batt, R., & O'Hare, D. (2005). Pilot behaviors in the face of adverse weather: A new look at an old problem. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 76, 552-559.
4.
Billings, C., & Reynard, W. (1984). Human factors in aircraft incidents: Results of a 7-year study. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine , 55, 960-965.
5.
Burian, B., Orasanu, J., & Hitt, J. (2000). Weather-related decision errors: Differences across flight types. In Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 1.22-1.25). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society .
6.
Conway, G., Mode, N., Berman, M., Martin, S., & Hill, A. (2005). Flight safety in Alaska: Comparing attitudes and practices of high-and low-risk air carriers. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 76, 52-57.
7.
Dekker, S. (2001). The re-invention of human error. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 1, 247-266.
8.
Dekker, S. (2002). The field guide to human error investigations . Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
9.
Detwiler, C., Hackworth, C., Holcomb, K., Boquet, A., Pfleiderer, E., Wiegmann, D., et al. (2006). Beneath the tip of the iceberg: A human factors analysis of general aviation accidents in Alaska versus the rest of the United States (Tech. Rep. No. DOT/FAA/AM-06/07). Oklahoma City, OK: Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medical Institute.
10.
Gaur, D. (2005). Human Factors Analysis and Classification System applied to civil aircraft accidents in India. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 76, 501-505.
11.
Goh, J., & Wiegmann, D. (2002). Human error analysis of accidents involving visual flight rules flight into adverse weather. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 78, 817-822.
12.
Heinrich, H., Peterson, D., & Roos, N. (1931). Industrial accident prevention: A safety management approach (1st ed.). New York : McGraw-Hill.
13.
Holbrook, J., Orasanu, J., & McCoy, C. (2003). Weather-related decision making by aviators in Alaska. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 12, 576-581.
14.
Knecht, W., Harris, H., & Shappell, S. (2003). Effects of visibility, cloud ceiling and financial incentive on general aviation voluntary takeoff into adverse weather. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Aviation Psychology , 12, 669-673.
15.
Li, G., Baker, S., Grabowski., J., & Rebok, G. (2001). Factors associated with pilot error in aviation crashes. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 72, 52-58.
16.
O'Hare, D., & Owen, D. (1999). Continued VFR into IMC: An empirical investigation of the possible causes: Final report on preliminary study. Unpublished manuscript , University of Otago, Dunedin , New Zealand.
17.
O'Hare, D., & Smitheram, T. (1995). "Pressing on" into deteriorating conditions: An application of behavioral decision theory to pilot decision making. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 5, 351-370.
18.
Rasmussen, J. (1982). Human errors: Ataxonomy for describing human malfunction in industrial installations. Journal of Occupational Accidents , 4, 311-333.
19.
Reason, J. (1990). Human error. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Reinach, S., & Viale, A. (2006). Application of a human error framework to conduct train accident/incident investigations. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38, 396-406.
21.
Salas, E., Burke, C.S., Bowers, C.A., & Wilson, K.A. (2001). Team training in the skies: Does crew resource management training work? Human Factors, 43, 641-674.
22.
Shappell, S., & Wiegmann, D. (1996). U.S. naval aviation mishaps 1977-92: Differences between single- and dual-piloted aircraft. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 67, 65-69.
23.
Shappell, S., & Wiegmann, D. (2001). Applying Reason: The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS). Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 1, 59-86.
24.
Shappell, S., & Wiegmann, D. (2003a). A human error analysis of general aviation controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) accidents occurring between 1990-1998 (Tech. Rep. No. DOT/FAA/AM-03/4). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine.
25.
Shappell, S., & Wiegmann, D. (2003b). Reshaping the way we look at general aviation accidents using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Aviation Psychology , 12, 1047-1052.
26.
Shappell, S., & Wiegmann, D. (2004). HFACS analysis of military and civilian aviation accidents: A NorthAmerican comparison. Proceedings of the ISASI 35th Annual International Seminar (pp. 135-140). Sterling, VA: International Society of Air Safety Investigators .
27.
Thomson, M., Onkal, D., Avcioglu, A., & Goodwin, P. (2004). Aviation risk perception: A comparison between experts and novices. Risk Analysis, 6, 1585-1595.
28.
Tvaryanas, A., Thompson, W., & Constable, S. (2005). U.S. military unmanned aerial vehicle mishaps: Assessment of the role of human factors using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) (U.S. Air Force Rep. No. HSW-PE-BR-TR-2005-0001) . Brooks City-Base, TX: Air Force Research Laboratory.
29.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1997). Human factors: FAA's guidance and oversight of pilot crew resource management training can be improved (GAO/RCED-98-7). Washington, DC : Author.
30.
Wiegmann, D., Goh, J., & O'Hare, D. (2002). The role of situation assessment and flight experience in pilots' decisions to continue visual flight rules flight into adverse weather. Human Factors, 44, 189-197.
31.
Wiegmann, D., & Shappell, S. (1997). Human factors analysis of post-accident data: Applying theoretical taxonomies of human error. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 7, 67-81.
32.
Wiegmann, D., & Shappell, S. (1999). Human error and crew resource management failures in naval aviation mishaps: A review of U.S. Naval Safety Center data, 1990-96 . Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 70, 1147-1151.
33.
Wiegmann, D., & Shappell, S. (2001a). Human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents: Application of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) . Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 72, 1006-1016.
34.
Wiegmann, D., & Shappell, S. (2001b). Human error perspectives in aviation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11, 341-357.
35.
Wiegmann, D., & Shappell, S. (2003). A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
36.
Wiegmann, D., Shappell, S., Boquet, A., Detwiler, C., Holcomb, K., & Faaborg, T. (2005). Human error and general aviation accidents: A comprehensive, fine-grained analysis using HFACS (Tech. Rep. No. DOT/FAA/AM-05/24) . Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine.
