The extent of electronic presentation of text in small display windows is mushrooming. In the present paper, 4 ways of presenting text in a small display window were examined and compared with a normal page condition: rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), RSVP with a completion meter, sentence-by-sentence presentation, and sentence-by-sentence presentation with a completion meter. Dependent measures were reading efficiency (speed and comprehension) and preference. For designers of hardware or software with small display windows, the results suggest the following: (a) Though RSVP is disliked by readers, the present methods of allowing self-pacing and regressions in RSVP are efficient and feasible, unlike earlier tested methods; (b) slower reading in RSVP should be achieved by increasing pauses between sentences or by repeating sentences, not by decreasing the presentation rate within a sentence; (c) completion meters do not interfere with performance and are usually preferred; (d) the space-saving sentence-by-sentence format is as efficient and as preferred as the normal page format.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brownstein, S. C., Weiner, M., & Green, S. W. (1994). Barron's students' #1 choice: How to prepare for the GRE graduate record examination general test (11th ed.). New York: Barron's Educational Series, Inc.
2.
Chen, H.-C. (1986). Effects of reading span and textual coherence on rapid-sequential reading. Memory & Cognition, 14, 202–208.
3.
Chen, H.-C., & Chan, K.-T. (1990). Reading computer-displayed moving text with and without self-control over the display rate. Behaviour & Information Technology, 9, 467–477.
4.
Chen, H.-C., Chan, K.-T., & Tsoi, K.-C. (1988). Reading self-paced moving text on a computer display. Human Factors, 30, 285–291.
5.
Chiou, G.-F. (1995). Reader interface of computer-based reading environment. International Journal of Instructional Media, 22, 121–133.
6.
Forster, K. L. (1970). Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 215–221.
7.
Gilbert, L. C. (1959). Speed of processing verbal stimuli and its relation to reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 8–14.
8.
Gould, J. D., & Grischkowsky, N. (1984). Doing the same work with hard copy and with cathode-ray tube (CRT) computer terminals. Human Factors, 26, 323–337.
9.
Granaas, M. M., McKay, T. D., Laham, R. D., Hurt, L. D., & Juola, J. F. (1984). Reading moving text on a CRT screen. Human Factors, 26, 97–104.
10.
Jackson, M. D., & McClelland, J. L. (1979). Processing determinants of reading speed. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 108, 151–191.
11.
Juola, J. F. (1988). The use of computer displays to improve reading comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3, 87–95.
12.
Juola, J. F., Haugh, D., Trast, S., Ferraro, R., & Liebhaber, M. (1987). Reading with and without eye movements. In J. K. O'Regan & A. Levy-Schoen(Eds.), Eye movements: From physiology to cognition (pp. 499–508). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
13.
Juola, J. F., Tiritoglu, A., & Pleunis, J. (1995). Reading text presented on a small display. Applied Ergonomics, 26, 227–229.
14.
Juola, J. F., Ward, N. J., & McNamara, T. (1982). Visual search and reading of rapid serial presentations of letter strings, words, and text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 208–227.
15.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.
16.
Kang, T. J., & Muter, P. (1989). Reading dynamically displayed text. Behaviour & Information Technology, 8, 33–42.
17.
Konrad, C. M., Kramer, A. F., Watson, S. E., & Weber, T. A. (1996). A comparison of sequential and spatial displays in a complex monitoring task. Human Factors, 38, 464–483.
18.
Kruk, R. S., & Muter, P. (1984). Reading of continuous text on video screens. Human Factors, 26, 339–345.
19.
Lang, V. A., Utesch, B. S., & Fly, P. M. (1993). Effects of display format and colour coding schemes on visual monitoring performance using spatially and temporally distributed visual displays. Displays, 14, 195–206.
20.
Masson, M. E. J. (1983). Conceptual processing of text during skimming and rapid sequential reading. Memory & Cognition, 11, 262–274.
21.
Matin, E., & Boff, K. R. (1988). Information transfer rate with serial and simultaneous visual display formats. Human Factors, 30, 171–180.
22.
Moore, D., & Zabrucky, K. (1995). Adult age differences in comprehension and memory for computer-displayed and printed text. Educational Gerontology, 21, 139–150.
23.
Muter, P. (1996). Interface design and optimization of reading of continuous text. In H. van Oostendorp & S. de Mul(Eds.), Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing (pp. 161–180). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
24.
Muter, P., Kruk, R. S., Buttigieg, M. A., & Kang, T. J. (1988). Reader-controlled computerized presentation of text. Human Factors, 30, 473–486.
25.
Muter, P., Latrémouille, S. A., Treurniet, W. C., & Beam, P. (1982). Extended reading of continuous text on television screens. Human Factors, 24, 501–508.
26.
Muter, P., & Maurutto, P. (1991). Reading and skimming from computer screens and books: The paperless office revisited?Behaviour & Information Technology, 10, 257–266.
27.
O'Hara, K., & Sellen, A. (1997). A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents. In Proceedings of CHI '97 (pp. 335–342). New York: ACM Press.
28.
Piolat, A., Roussey, J. -Y., & Thunin, O. (1997). Effects of screen presentation on text reading and revising. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47, 513–607.
29.
Potter, M. C. (1984). Rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP): A method for studying language processing. In D. E. Kieras & M. A. Just(Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research (pp. 91–118). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30.
Rothkopf, E. Z. (1971). Incidental memory for location of information in text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 608–613.
31.
Sekey, A., & Tietz, J. (1982). Text display by “saccadic scrolling.”Visible Language, 16, 62–76.
32.
Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33.
Stine, E. A. L. (1990). On-line processing of written text by younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 5, 68–78.
34.
Williamson, N. L., Muter, P., & Kruk, R. S. (1986). Computerized presentation of text for the visually handicapped. In E. Hjelmquist & L. G. Nilsson(Eds.), Communication and handicap: Aspects of psychological compensation and technical aids (pp. 115–125). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
35.
Zabrucky, K., & Moore, D. (1994). Contributions of working memory and evaluation and regulation of understanding to adults' recall of text. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 49, 201–212.
