Information visualization is the art and science of representing abstract information in a visual form that enables human users to gain insight through their perceptual and cognitive capabilities. In this chapter, we examine some key human factors aspects of information visualizations. We begin with an overview of major information visualization principles and techniques, with background on human factors issues that drove the development of those principles and techniques. Next, we look at how human capabilities are best used by visualization, focusing on the use of animation in visualizations. Then we look at the emerging area of large display visualization, examining how visualization changes when a user cannot easily see the entire visualization in detail. We then discuss evaluation of information visualizations, discussing aspects of utility and usability. We conclude by discussing remaining challenges in information visualization and how the field is changing today.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaeckerR.SmallI. (1990). Animation at the interface. In LaurelB. (Ed.), The art of human-computer interface design (pp. 251–267). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
BallR.NorthC. (2007). Realizing embodied interaction for visual analytics through large displays. Computers & Graphics, 31, 380–400.
3.
BartramL. (1998). Enhancing visualizations with motion. In Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization: Late Breaking Hot Topics (pp. 13–16). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
4.
BartramL.WareC. (2002). Filtering and brushing with motion. Information Visualization, 1, 66–79.
5.
BartramL.WareC.CalvertT. (2003). Moticons: Detection, distraction and task. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 515–545.
6.
BaudischP.TanD.CollumbM.RobbinsD.HinckleyK.AgrawalaM., et al. (2006). Phosphor: Explaining transitions in the user interface using afterglow effects. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 169–178). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
BedersonB.BoltmanA. (1999). Does animation help users build mental maps of spatial information? In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (pp. 28–35). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
9.
BellottiV. (1988). Implications of current design practice for the use of HCI techniques. In Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the British Computer Society Human Computer Interaction Specialist Group—People and Computers IV (pp. 13–34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BertinJ. (1983). Semiology of graphics (W. J. Berg, Trans.). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. (Original work published 1967).
CardS.MackinlayJ.ShneidermanB. (Eds.) (1999). Readings in information visualization: Using vision to think. San Francisco: Morgan Kauffman.
14.
CardS.RobertsonG.MackinlayJ. (1991). The information visualizer: An information workspace. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Reaching Through Technology (pp. 181–188). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
15.
CarriereJ.KazmanR. (1995). Interacting with huge hierarchies: Beyond cone trees. In Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (pp. 74–81). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
16.
CatramboneR.SeayA. (2002). Using animation to help students learn computer algorithms. Human Factors, 44, 459–511.
17.
ChangB.UngarD. (1993). Animation: From cartoons to the user interface. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 45–55). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
18.
ChangK. (2007). Introduction to geographic information systems. New York: McGraw Hill.
19.
ChenC.CzerwinskiM. (2000). Introduction to the special issue on empirical evaluation of information visualizations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, 631–635.
20.
ClevelandW. (1985). The elements of graphing data. Summit, NJ: Hobart Press.
21.
ClevelandW.McGillR. (1985). Graphical perception and graphical methods for analyzing scientific data. Science, 229, 828–833.
22.
CockburnA.KarlsonA.BedersonB. (2008). A Review of overview + detail, zooming, and focus + context interfaces. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(1), 1–31.
23.
CockburnA.McKenzieB. (2004). Evaluating spatial memory in two and three dimensions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61, 359–373.
24.
CzerwinskiM.SmithG.ReganT.MeyersB.RobertsonG.StarkweatherG. (2003). Toward characterizing the productivity benefits of very large displays. In Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT′03: IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Comptuer Interaction (pp. 9–16). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
25.
CzerwinskiM.TanD.RobertsonG. (2002). Women take a wider view. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI 2002 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves (pp. 195–202). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
26.
EadesP.McKayB.WormaldN. (1986). On an edge crossing problem. In Proceedings of the 9th Australian Computer Science Conference (pp. 327–334). Canberra: Australian Computer Society.
27.
EadesP.SugiyamaK. (1990). How to draw a directed graph. Journal of Information Processing, 13, 424–437.
28.
FabrikantS.MontelloD.RuccoM.MiddletonR. (2004). The distance-similarity metaphor in network-display spatializations. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 31, 237–252.
29.
FairchildK.PoltrockS.FurnasG. (1999). SemNet: Three-dimensional graphic representations of large knowledge bases. In CardS.MackinlayJ.ShneidermanB. (Eds.), Readings in information visualization: Using vision to think (pp. 190–206). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
30.
FewS. (2004). Show me the numbers: Designing tables and graphs to enlighten. Oakland, CA: Analytics Press.
31.
FurnasG. (1986). Generalized fisheye views. In Proceedings of the 1986 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 16–23). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
32.
GansnerE.KoutsofiosE.NorthS.VoK. (1993). A technique for drawing directed graphs. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 19, 214–230.
GonzalesV.KobsaA. (2003). A workplace study of the adoption of information visualization systems. In Proceedings of I-KNOW′03: 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 92–102). Graz, Austria: Journal of Universal Computer Science.
35.
GrudinJ. (2001). Partitioning digital worlds: Focal and peripheral awareness in multiple monitor use. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 458–465). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
36.
HammingR. (1973). Numerical analysis for scientists and engineers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
37.
HealeyC. (1996). Choosing effective colours for data visualization. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Visualization (pp. 263–270). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
HealeyC.BoothK.EnnsJ. (1993). Harnessing preattentive processes for multivariate data visualization. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface ′93 (pp. 107–117). Wellesley, MA: A K Peters.
40.
HeerJ.RobertsonG. (2007). Animated transitions in statistical data graphics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13, 1240–1247.
41.
HenryN.FeketeJ.-D. (2007). MatLink: Enhanced matrix visualization for analyzing social networks. In Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction—INTERACT 2007, 11th IFIP TC 13 International Conference (pp. 288–302). New York: Springer.
42.
HutchingsD.SmithG.MeyersB.CzerwinskiM.RobertsonG. (2004). Display space usage and window management operation comparisons between single monitor and multiple monitor users. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AV I 2004 (pp. 32–39). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
43.
IraniP.WareC. (2003). Diagramming information structures using 3D perceptual primitives. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 10(1), 1–19.
44.
IsenbergP.TangA.CarpendaleS. (2008). An exploratory study of visual information analysis. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1217–1226). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
45.
JohnsonB.ShneidermanB. (1991). Treemaps: A space-filing approach to the visualization of hierarchical information. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization ′91 (pp. 275–282). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
46.
KangY.StaskoJ. (2008). Lightweight task/application performance using single versus multiple monitors: A comparative study. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2008 (pp. 17–24). Toronto: Canadian Information Processing Society.
47.
KehoeC.StaskoJ.TaylorA. (2001). Rethinking the evaluation of algorithm animations as learning aids: An observational study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54, 265–284.
48.
KleinG.MoonB.HoffmanR. (2006). Making sense of sensemaking 2: A macrocognitive model. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(5), 88–92.
49.
LampingJ.RaoR. (1994). Laying out and visualizing large trees using a hyperbolic space. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 13–15). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
50.
LasseterJ. (1987). Principles of traditional animation applied to 3D computer animation. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (pp. 35–44). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
51.
MackinlayJ. (1986). Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 5, 110–141.
52.
MackinlayJ.HanrahanP.StolteC. (2007). Show me: Automatic presentation for visual analysis. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13, 1137–1144.
53.
MayerR.MorenoR. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 87–99.
54.
McCormickB.DeFantiT.BrownM. (1987). Visualization in scientific computing. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
55.
MichotteA. (1963). The perception of causality. London: Methuen.
MunznerT. (1997). H3: Laying out large directed graphs in 3D hyperbolic space. In Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (pp. 2–10). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
58.
NeumanW.KreugerL. (2003). Social work research methods: Qualitative and quantitative applications. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
59.
NewellA. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
NielsenJ. (1990). Big paybacks from “discount” usability engineering. IEEE Software, 7(3), 107–108.
NorthC.ShneidermanB. (2000). Snap-together visualizations: Can user construct and operate coordinated views. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, 715–739.
64.
PalmerS. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65.
PererA.ShneidermanB. (2008). Integrating statistics and visualization: Case studies of gaining clarity during exploratory data analysis. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 265–274). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
66.
PirolliP.CardS. (1999). Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106, 643–675.
PlaisantC. (2004). The challenge of information visualization evaluation. In Proceedings of the 2004 Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (pp. 109–116). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
69.
PlaisantC.FeketeJ.-D.GrinsteinG. (2008). Promoting insight-based evaluation of visualizations: From contest to benchmark repository. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14, 120–134.
70.
PlaisantC.GrosjeanJ.BedersonB. (2002). SpaceTree: Supporting exploration in large node link tree, design evolution and empirical evaluation. In Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (pp. 57–64). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
71.
RivaM.WachtelM. (2005). Field studies: A focus on group research. In WheelanS. (Ed.), The handbook of group research and practice (pp. 241–250). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
72.
RobertsonG.CameronK.CzerwinskiM.RobbinsD. (2002). Animated visualization of multiple intersecting hierarchies. Information Visualization, 1, 50–65.
73.
RobertsonG.CardS.MackinlayJ. (1991). Cone trees: Animated 3D visualizations of hierarchical information. In Proceedings of the 1991 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Reaching Through Technology (pp. 189–194). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
74.
RobertsonG.CzerwinskiM.BaudischP.MeyersB.RobbinsD.SmithG., et al. (2005). Large display user experience. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 25(4), 44–51.
75.
RobertsonG.CzerwinskiM.LarsonK.RobbinsD.ThielD.van DantzichM. (1998). Data Mountain: Using spatial memory for document management. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 153–162). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
76.
RobertsonG.FernandezR.FisherD.LeeB.StaskoJ. (2008). Effectiveness of animation in trend visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14, 1325–1332.
77.
RobertsJ.WrightM. (2006). Towards ubiquitous brushing for information visualization. In Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Information Visualization, IV′06 (pp. 151–156). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
78.
RussellD.StefikM.PirolliP.CardS. (1993). The cost structure of sensemaking. In Proceedings of the INTERACT ′93 and CHI ′93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 269–276). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
79.
SaraiyaP.NorthC.DucaK. (2004). An evaluation of microarray visualization tools for biological insight. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Symposium on Information (pp. 1–8). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
80.
SaraiyaP.NorthC.LamV.DucaK. A. (2006). An insight-based longitudinal study of visual analytics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12, 1511–1522.
81.
SarkarM.BrownM. (1992). Graphical fisheye views of graphs. In Proceedings of the 1992 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 83–91). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
82.
SarkarM.SnibbeS.TverskyO.ReissS. (1993). Stretching the rubber sheet: A metaphor for viewing large layouts on small screens. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 81–91). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
83.
SeoJ.ShneidermanB. (2006). Knowledge discovery in high dimensional data: Case studies and a user survey for the rank-by-feature framework. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12, 311–322.
84.
ShneidermanB. (1994). Dynamic queries for visual information seeking. IEEE Software, 11(6), 70–77.
85.
ShneidermanB. (1996). The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages (pp. 336–343). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
86.
ShneidermanB.FischerG.CzerwinskiM.ResnickM.MyersB.CandyL., et al. (2006). Creativity support tools: Report from a U.S. National Science Foundation sponsored workshop. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 20, 61–77.
87.
ShneidermanB.PlaisantC. (2006). Strategies for evaluating information visualization tools: Multidimensional in-depth long-term case studies. In Proceedings of the 2006 AV I Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Information Visualization (pp. 1–7). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
88.
StaskoJ.McColginD.MillerT.PlaueC.PousmanZ. (2005). Evaluating the InfoCanvas peripheral awareness system: A longitudinal, in situ study (Technical Report GIT-GVU-05–08). Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.
89.
StaskoJ.ZhangE. (2000). Focus + context display and navigation techniques for enhancing radial, spacefilling hierarchy visualizations. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2000 (pp. 57–68). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
90.
TanD.CzerwinskiM.RobertsonG. (2003). Women go with the (optical) flow. In Proceedings of the 2003 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 209–215). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
91.
ThomasJ.CookK. (2005). Illuminating the path. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
92.
TreismanA. (1982). Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 8, 194–214.
93.
TreismanA.GormicanS. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15–48.
94.
TufteE. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
TukeyJ. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
97.
TverskyB.MorrisonJ.BetrancourtM. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 247–262.
98.
ViegasF.WattenbergM. (2006). Communication-minded visualization: A call to action. IBM Systems Journal, 45, 801–812.
99.
ViegasF.WattenbergM.van HamF.KrissJ.McKeonM. (2007). Many eyes: A site for visualization at Internet scale. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13, 1121–1128.
100.
WareC. (2004). Information visualization: Perception for design (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
101.
WareC.BobrowR. (2004). Motion to support rapid interactive queries on node-link diagrams. Transactions on Applied Perception, 1, 3–18.
102.
WattenbergM.KrissJ. (2006). Designing for social data analysis. Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12, 549–557.
103.
WickensC.CarswellC. (1995). The proximity compatibility principle: Its psychological foundation and relevance to display design. Human Factors, 37, 473–494.
104.
WickensC.HollandsJ. (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
105.
WilhelmsonR.JewettB.ShawC.WickerL.ArrottM.BushellC., et al. (1990). A study of the evolution of a numerically modeled severe storm. International Journal of Supercomputer Applications and High Performance Engineering, 4(2), 20–36.
106.
WoodsD. (1984). Visual momentum: A concept to improve the cognitive coupling of person and computer. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 21, 229–244.
107.
YangF.GoodellH.PickettR.BobrowR.BaumannA.GeeA., et al. (2006). Data exploration combining kinetic and static visualization displays. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization (pp. 21–30). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
108.
YiJ.KangY.StaskoJ.JackoJ. (2008). Understanding and characterizing insights: How do people gain insights using information visualization? In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Information Visualization (pp. 1–6). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
109.
YostB.HaciahmetogluY.NorthC. (2007). Beyond visual acuity: The perceptual scalability of information visualizations for large displays. In Proceedings of the 2007 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 101–110). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
110.
ZongkerD.SalesinD. (2003). On creating animated presentations. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (pp. 298–308). Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland: Eurographics Association.
