Previous research shows that success in touch-typing training does not ensure its continuation into everyday use. It is postulated that an important contributor to this problem is melioration–that is, maximizing local rates of reinforcement. In the context of typing, melioration implies an intuitive tendency to choose typing strategies that lead to a better immediate performance level than that obtained by touch-typing. One such strategy is visually guided typing, in which the performer looks at the keys to locate their position. The present research describes a training approach that changes the reinforcement structure by increasing the attractiveness of looking at the screen while typing. This approach is implemented by using a secondary task that requires typists to respond to signals appearing on the screen. In an experiment that evaluated this solution, 22 students were given a touch-typing training course followed by a period in which they had to type their own homework. The results showed that under a modified reinforcement condition, the effect of melioration on touch-typing scores in the posttraining phase decreased. In addition, the experimental manipulation facilitated the acquisition and maintenance of the touch-typing skill. Actual or potential applications of this research include research in training, choice behavior, and human-computer interaction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allport, D. A., Antonis, B., & Reynolds, P. (1972). On the division of attention: A disproof of the single channel hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 225–235.
2.
Baddeley, A. D., & Longman, D. J. A. (1978). The influence of length and frequency of training session on the rate of learning to type. Ergonomics, 21, 627–635.
3.
Bartholome, L. W., Lloyd, W., & Long, I. D. (1986). Teaching keyboarding to elementary school students. National Association of Laboratory Schools Journal, 2, 22–28.
4.
Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 145–153.
5.
Cooper, W. E. (1983). Introduction. In W. E. Cooper (Ed.), Cognitive aspects of skilled typewriting (pp. 1–38). New York: Springer-Verlag.
6.
Coren, S., & Ward, L. (1989). Sensation and perception (3rd ed.). San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
7.
Crooks, M. (1964). Touch typing for teachers.London: Pitman.
8.
Davison, M., & Nevin, J. A. (1999). Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: An integration. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 439–482.
9.
Erez, M., & Zidon, I. (1984). Effects of goal acceptance on the relationship of goal setting and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 69–78.
10.
Farmer, G. (2001). Nail it now typing tutor. Port Melbourne, Australia: Nail It Now. Available from http://www.nailitnow.com.au/typingtutor/
11.
Flowers, J. H., & Lohr, D. J. (1985). How does familiarity affect visual search for letter strings. Perception and Psychophysics, 37, 557–567.
12.
Gentner, D. R. (1983). Keystroke timing in transcription typing. In W. E. Cooper (Ed.), Cognitive aspects of skilled typewriting (pp. 95–120). New York: Springer-Verlag.
13.
Ginat, R. (1992). Rabbit: A Hebrew-English touch typing course (Version 2) [Computer software]. Makh-Shevet, Israel: Kibutz Gelil-Yam.
14.
Gopher, D., Weil, M., & Siegel, D. (1989). Practice under changing priorities: An approach to training of complex skills. Acta Psychologica, 71, 147–179.
15.
Herrnstein, R. J., Loewenstein, G. F., Prelec, D., & Vaughan, W., Jr. (1993). Utility maximization and melioration: Internalities in individual choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6, 149–185.
16.
Herrnstein, R. J., & Prelec, D. (1991). Melioration: A theory of distributed choice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 137–156.
17.
Herrnstein, R. J., & Vaughan, W., Jr. (1980). Melioration and behavioral allocation. In J. E. R. Staddon (Ed.), Limits to action: The allocation of individual behavior (pp. 143–176). New York: Academic.
18.
Hilgard, E. R., & Marquis, D. G. (1940). Conditioning and learning.New York: Appleton Century.
19.
Hobby Maker. (1997). Speed click [Computer program]. Available at http://www.sinapsa.com
20.
Larochelle, S. (1983). A comparison of skilled and novice performance in discontinuous typing. In W. E. Cooper (Ed.), Cognitive aspects of skilled typewriting (pp. 67–94). New York: Springer-Verlag.
21.
Long, J. B. (1976a). Effects of delayed irregular feedback on unskilled and skilled keying performance. Ergonomics, 19, 183–202.
22.
Long, J. B. (1976b). Visual feedback and skilled keying: Differential effects of masking the printed copy and the keyboard. Ergonomics, 19, 93–110.
23.
Long, J. B., Nimmo-Smith, I., & Whitefield, A. (1983). Skilled typing: A characterization based on the distribution of times between responses. In W. E. Cooper (Ed.), Cognitive aspects of skilled typewriting (pp. 145–196). New York: Springer-Verlag.
24.
Lovasz, L., & Plummer, M. D. (1986). Matching theory.Amsterdam: North-Holland.
25.
Madden, D. J. (1987). Aging, attention and the use of meaning during visual search. Cognitive Development, 2, 201–216.
26.
Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1999). Precis to a practical unified theory of cognition and action: Some lessons from EPIC computational models of human multiple-task performance. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Cognitive regulation of performance, theory and applications (pp. 17–88). Cambridge: MIT Press.
27.
Powell, J., & Azrin, N. (1968). The effect of shock as a punisher for cigarette smoking. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 63–71.
28.
Rensink, R. A. (2000). Visual search for change: A probe into the nature of attentional processing. Visual Cognition, 7, 345–376.
29.
Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. (1982). Simulating a skilled typist: A study of skilled cognitive-motor performance. Cognitive Science, 6, 1–36.
30.
Seagull, J., & Gopher, D. (1997). Training head movements in visual scanning: An embedded approach to the development of piloting skills with helmet mounted displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 463–580.
31.
Shulansky, J. D., & Herman, D. J. (1977). The influence of linguistic structure on typing. Language and Speech, 20, 80–85.
32.
Skinner, B. F. (1936). The effect on the amount of conditioning of an interval of time before reinforcement. Journal of General Psychology, 14, 279–295.
33.
Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J. H., & Fisch, R. (1974). Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution.New York: Norton.
34.
West, L. J. (1969). Acquisition of typewriting skills.New York: Pitman.
35.
Wichter, S., Haas, M., Canzoneri, S., & Alexander, R. (1997). Keyboarding skills for middle school students. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan-Dearborn. Retrieved December 30, 3003, from http://www.soe.umd.umich.edu/soe/maaipt/research/research.html
36.
Wickens, C. D., Vidulich, M., & Sandry, G. D. (1984). Principles of S-C-R compatibility with spatial and verbal tasks: The role of display-control location and voice-interactive display-control interfacing. Human Factors, 26, 533–543.
37.
Yechiam, E. (2003). A strategy based model to the interpretation of visual dominance in complex motor tasks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Haifa, Technion---Israel Institute of Technology.
38.
Yechiam, E., Erev, I., Gopher, D., & Yehene, V. (2000). System and method for teaching touch typing. Patent Application No. 137852 in Israel.
