The Limits of an Egalitarian Ethos: G. A. Cohen's Critique of Rawlsian Liberalism

G. A. Cohen's critique of the Rawlsian difference principle points out an inconsistency in its presentation. The initial equality decided by the participants in the original position under the veil of ignorance is not preserved by the inequality sanctioned by the difference principle. Cohen shows how the breakdown of the initial equality prevents the desired results of the Rawlsian system from being realized. He argues that an egalitarian ethos is required within a society for equality-preserving economic distributions and Pareto-superior outcomes to occur. Nonetheless, Cohen's analysis of Rawls misses the ultimate cause of inequality, which is the dynamics of capital accumulation. An egalitarian ethos is only possible if there is a socialist mode of production to facilitate its development. Additionally, Cohen's critique of Rawlsian constructivism through an argument for intuitionism does not address the natural-material existence of human beings. This existence must be considered for any theory of social formation that intends to have advantageous results.