A concept originally formulated in the context of Karl Marx's sociological investigations - the Erscheinungsformen, or phenomenal forms - plays a key role in relation to a number of educational inquiries, and has important heuristic value for them. Lev Vygotsky saw the concept of phenomenal forms as central to the original Marxian paradigm, and he deployed it as he developed his account of cognitive development in humans. Full development of the concept, however, shows that its integration into cognitive psychology by Vygotsky was incomplete in crucial respects, and pedagogical flaws were the result. The phenomenal forms may prove useful in explaining the transition between Vygotsky's socio-constructivism and the subsequent developments led by Paulo Freire's critical pedagogy.
AuWayne. 2007. “Vygotsky and Lenin on Learning: The Parallel Structures of Individual and Social Development.” Science & Society, 71:3, 273–98.
4.
Balibar, Étienne. 2007 (1993). The Philosophy of Marx. London: Verso.
5.
BiestaGert. 1998. “Say You Want a Revolution: Suggestions for the Impossible Future of Critical Pedagogy.” Educational Theory, 48:4, 499–510.
6.
BreuingMary. 2011. “Problematizing Critical Pedagogy.” International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 3:3, 2–23.
7.
Camangian, Patrick R. 2013. “Seeing Through Lies: Teaching Ideological Literacy As a Corrective Lens.” Equity & Excellence in Education, 46:1, 119–34.
8.
ColeMichael, and SilviaScribner. 1978. “Introduction.” Pp. 1–14 in Lev S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
9.
CumminsJim. 1986. “Empowering Minority Students: A Framework for Intervention.” Harvard Educational Review, 56, 18–36.
10.
EarpBrian. 2013. “Early Academic Self Concepts and the Racial Achievement Gap.” Journal of Social & Psychological Sciencies, 6:1, 3–26.
EngelsFriedrich. 1940 (1883). Dialectics of Nature. New York: International Publishers.
13.
FineBen, and DimitrisMilonakis. 2011. “‘Useless but True’: Economic Crisis and the Peculiarities of Economic Science.” Historical Materialism, 19:2, 3–31.
14.
FreirePaulo. 1980. “Entrevista.” Pp. 158–9 in Carlos A. Torres, Paulo Freire. Educación y conscientización. Salamanca, Spain: Sígueme.
15.
FreirePaulo. 1990. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
16.
FreirePaulo. 2000. The Paulo Freire Reader. New York: Continuum.
17.
FreirePaulo, and AntonioFaundez. 1989. Learning to Question. New York: Continuum.
18.
GirouxHenry A.1983. “Theories of Reproduction and Resistance in the New Sociology of Education: A Critical Analysis.” Harvard Educational Review, 53:3, 257–93.
19.
GirouxHenry A.1987. “Introduction: Literacy and the Pedagogy of Political Empowerment.” Pp. 1–28 in Paulo Freire and Donaldo Macedo, Reading the Word and the World. Westport, Connecticut: Bergin & Garvey.
20.
GirouxHenry A.2006. “Border Pedagogy in the Age of Postmodernism.” Pp. 47–66 in Henry A. Giroux and Christopher G. Robbins, eds., The Giroux Reader. Boulder, Colorado/London: Paradigm Publishers.
HymanLudmila. 2012. “Vygotsky's ‘Crisis’: Argument, Context, Relevance.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43, 473–82.
24.
John-Steiner, Vera, and EllenSouberman. 1978. “Afterword.” Pp. 121–33 in Lev S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
25.
JonesOwen. 2011. Chavs: The Demonization of the Working Class. London: Verso.
26.
KofmanSarah. 1999 (1973). Camera Obscura: Of Ideology. New York: Cornell University Press.
27.
KozulinAlex. 2012 (1986). “Vygotsky in Context.” Pp. xxv-lxxii in Lev S. Vygotsky, Thought and Language. Cambridge, Massachusetts/London: MIT Press.
28.
LakeRobert. 2012. Vygotsky on Education. Bern, Switzerland/New York: Peter Lang.
29.
Lemke, Jay L. 2002. “Language Development and Identity: Multiple Timescales in the Social Ecology of Learning.” Pp. 68–87 in Claire Kramsch, ed., Language Acquisition and Language Socialization. London: Continuum.
30.
Lenin, Vladimir I. 1965 (1919). “A Great Beginning: Heroism of the Workers in the Rear: ‘Communist Subbotniks’.” In V. I. Lenin, Collected Works, Vol. 29. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
31.
Lewis, Tyson E. 2009. “Too Little, Too Late: Reflections on Fredric Jameson's Pedagogy of Form.” Rethinking Marxism, 21:3, 438–52.
32.
LourençoOrlando. 2012. “Piaget and Vygotski: Many Resemblances, and a Crucial Difference.” New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 281–95.
33.
MarxKarl. 1959 (1894). Capital. Vol. III. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
34.
MarxKarl. 1991 (1867). Capital. Vol. 56 in Mortimer J. Adler, ed., Great Books of the Western World. Chicago, Illinois: Britannica.
35.
MarxKarl, and FriedrichEngels. 1978 (1846). “The German Ideology.” Pp. 146–200 in Robert C. Tucker, ed., The Marx-Engels Reader. Second Edition. New York: Norton.
36.
McLarenPeter. 2001. “Che Guevara, Paulo Freire, and the Politics of Hope: Re-claiming Critical Pedagogy.” Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies, 1:1, 108–31.
37.
MiliosJohn, and DimitriDimoulis. 2006. “Louis Althusser and the Forms of Concealment of Capitalist Exploitation. A Rejoiner to Mike Wayne.” Historical Materialism, 14:2, 135–148.
38.
MillerRonald. 2011. Vygotsky in Perspective. Cambridge, England: Cambridge Universiety Press.
39.
Moll, Luis C. 2013. Lev Vygotsky and Education. New York: Routledge.
40.
OsbornePeter. 2005. How to Read Marx. New York/London: Norton.
41.
RosaAlberto, and IgnacioMontero. 1992. “The Historical Context of Vygotsky's Work: A Socio-Historical Approach.” Pp. 59–88 in Luis C. Moll, ed., Vygotsky and Education: Instructional Implications and Applications of Sociohistorical Psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
42.
ShorIra. 1993. “Education Is Politics: Paulo Freire's Critical Pedagogy.” Pp. 25–36 in McLarenP. and LeonardP. eds., Paulo Freire. A Critical Encounter. New York: Routledge.
43.
SongSeonmi, and DavidKellog. 2011. “Word Meaning as a Palimpsest: A Defense of Sociocultural Theory.” The Modern Language Journal, 95:4, 549–604.
44.
StetsenkoAnna. 2012. “Personhood: An Activist Project of Historical Becoming Through Collaborative Pursuits of Social Transformation.” New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 144–53.
45.
Villacañasde Castro, LuisS.2013. Giro coperanicano y ciencias sociales [The Copernican Turn and the Social Sciences]. Madrid/México D.F.: Plaza y Valdés.
46.
VygotskyLev S.1978. Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
47.
VygotskyLev S.1994. “The Development of Academic Concepts in School Aged Children.” Pp. 355–70 in Renée van de Veer and Jaan Valsiner, eds., The Vygotsky Reader. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
48.
VygotskyLev S.2012 (1934). Thought and Language. Cambridge, Massachusetts/London: MIT Press.
49.
Waddington, Conrad H. 1991 (1961). The Nature of Life. Vol. 56 in AdlerJ., ed., Great Books of the Western World. Chicago, Illinois: Britannica.
50.
WertschJames W.1988. Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
51.
WertschJames W.2007. “Mediation.” Pp. 178–92 in Harry Daniels, Michel Cole, and James Wertsch, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
52.
ZavershnevaE. I.2010. “The Vygotsky Family Archive (1912-1934): New Findings.” Journal of Russian and European Psychology, 48:1, 14–30.
