The social structure of accumulation (SSA) theory seeks to bridge the gap between highly abstract Marxian categories and concrete history in the analysis of institutional structures of capitalist society. More specifically, the theory focuses on the temporal transformation and national specificity of capital-labor relations. However, SSA theory cannot adequately explain why these relations take specific forms in time and space. In general, the theory fails to reconcile the concrete and the abstract, falling back on unmediated historical explanations. These explanatory limitations derive from an empiricist methodology, which can be examined through the lens of Juan Iñigo Carrera's development of Marxian theory. Iñigo Carrera additionally offers an alternative approach to the historical transformation of capital-labor relations and their national specificities. This explanation derives from Marx's analysis of the transformation of the materiality of the capitalist labor process, and explains concrete phenomena through the further development of abstract categories.
BGW.BowlesSamuel, GordonDavid M., and WeisskopfThomas E.1986. “Power and Profits: The Social Structure of Accumulation and the Profitability of the Postwar U.S. Economy.” Review of Radical Political Economics, 18:1–2, 132–167.
2.
BurnhamPeter. 1994. “Open Marxism and Vulgar International Political Economy.” Review of International Political Economy, 1:2, 221–231.
3.
CaligarisGastón. 2016. The Global Accumulation of Capital and Ground-Rent in “Resource Rich” Countries. Pp. 55–79 in Greig Charnock and GuidoStarosta, eds., The New International Division of Labour: Global Transformation and Uneven Development. London: Macmillan.
4.
ClarkeSimon. 1992. The Global Accumulation of Capital and the Periodisation of the Capitalist State Form. Pp. 133–151 in WernerBonefeld, GunnRichard and KosmasPsychopedis, eds., Open Marxism: Contemporary Debates. London: Pluto Press.
5.
CharnockGreig, and GuidoStarosta. 2016. “Introduction: The New International Division of Labour and the Critique of Political Economy Today.” Pp. 1–23 in Greig Charnock and GuidoStarosta, The New International Division of Labour: Global Transformation and Uneven Development. London: Macmillan.
6.
CharnockGreig, and GuidoStarosta. 2018. “Towards a ‘Unified Field Theory’ of Uneven Development: Human Productive Subjectivity, Capital and the International.” Global Society, 32:3, 324–343.
7.
GER.GordonDavid M., RichardEdwards, and MichaelReich. 1982. Segmented Work, Divided Workers: The Historical Transformation of Labor in the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
GrinbergNicolás. 2011. Transformations in the Korean and Brazilian Processes of Capitalist Development Between the Mid-1950s and the Mid-2000s: The Political Economy of Late Industrialization. PhD Thesis, London School of Economics. London, England.
9.
GrinbergNicolás. 2016. “From Populist Developmentalism to Liberal Neodevelopmentalism: The Specificity and Historical Development of Brazilian Capital Accumulation.” Critical Historical Studies, 3:1, 65–104.
10.
HeinrichMichael. 2004. An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital. New York: NYU Press.
11.
Iñigo CarreraJuan. 2002. “Transformations in Capital Accumulation: From the National Production of an Universal Labourer to the International Fragmentation of the Productive Subjectivity of the Working-Class.” Buenos Aires: CICP (Centro para la Investigación como Crítica Práctica).
12.
Iñigo CarreraJuan. 2007. Capital: Historical Reason, Revolutionary Subject and Consciousness. Transl. L. Kosloff. Buenos Aires: Imago Mundi.
13.
Iñigo CarreraJuan. 2013. “Method: From the Grundrisse to Capital.” Pp. 43–69 in RiccardoBellofiore, StarostaGuido and ThomasPeter D., eds., In Marx's Laboratory: Critical Interpretations of the Grundrisse. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
14.
Iñigo CarreraJuan. 2014. “The Historical Determination of the Capitalist Mode of Production and of the Working Class as the Revolutionary Subject.” Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory, 42:4, 555–572.
15.
Iñigo CarreraJuan. 2016. “The General Rate of Profit and Its Realisation in the Differentiation of Industrial Capitals.” Pp. 24–53 in Greig Charnock and GuidoStarosta, eds., The New International Division of Labour: Global Transformation and Uneven Development. London: Macmillan.
16.
KotzDavid M.1994. “Interpreting the Social Structure of Accumulation Theory.” Pp. 50–71 in KotzDavid M., TerrenceMcDonough, and MichaelReich, Social Structures of Accumulation: The Political Economy of Growth and Crisis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
KotzDavid M.2017. “Social Structure of Accumulation Theory, Marxist Theory, and System Transformation.” Review of Radical Political Economics, 49:4, 534–542.
18.
KotzDavid M., and TerrenceMcDonough. 2010. “Global Neoliberalism and the Contemporary Social Structure of Accumulation.” Pp. 93–120 in McDonough, et. al.
19.
KMR.KotzDavid M., TerrenceMcDonough, and ReichMichael. “Introduction.” Pp. 1–8 in KotzDavid M., TerrenceMcDonough, and MichaelReich, Social Structures of Accumulation: The Political Economy of Growth and Crisis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
LippitVictor D.2010. “Social Structure of Accumulation Theory.” Pp. 45–71 in McDonough, et. al.
21.
LukácsGyörgy. 1971 (1923). History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics.Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
22.
MarxKarl. 1881. “Notes on Wagner.”Marxist Internet Archive.
23.
MarxKarl. 1990. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. VolumeI. London: Penguin Classics.
24.
MarxKarl. 1993. Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. London: Penguin Classics.
25.
McDonoughTerrence. 1994. “Social Structures of Accumulation, Contingent History, and Stages of Capitalism.” Pp. 72–84 in KotzDavid M., TerrenceMcDonough, and MichaelReich, Social Structures of Accumulation: The Political Economy of Growth and Crisis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
McDonoughTerrence. 2007. “Social Structures of Accumulation Theory: The State of the Art.” Review of Radical Political Economics, 40:2, 153–173.
27.
McDonoughTerrence. 2010. “State of the Art of SSA Theory.” Pp. 23–44 in McDonough, et. al.
28.
McDonoughTerrence, MichaelReich, and KotzDavid M.2010. Contemporary Capitalism and Its Crises: Social Structure of Accumulation Theory for the 21st Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
McDonoughTerrence, MichaelReich, and KotzDavid M.2010. “Introduction: SSA Theory for the 21st Century.” Pp. 1–23 in McDonough, et. al.
30.
NolanPeter, and P. K. Edwards. 1984. “Homogenise, Divide and Rule: An Essay on ‘Segmented Work, Divided Workers.’” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 8:2, 197–215.
31.
O'HaraPhilip. 2006. Growth and Development in the Global Political Economy: Social Structures of Accumulation and Modes of Regulation.New York: Routledge.
32.
PostoneMoishe. 1978. “Necessity, Labor, and Time: A Reinterpretation of the Marxian Critique of Capitalism.” Social Research, 45:4, 739–788.
33.
RosenbergSamuel. 2010. Labor in the Contemporary Social Structure of Accumulation. Pp. 195–215 in McDonough, et. al.
34.
StarostaGuido. 2010. “Global Commodity Chains and the Marxian Law of Value.” Antipode, 42:2, 433–465.
StarostaGuido, and AlejandroFitzsimmons. 2017. “Rethinking the Determinations of the Value of Labor Power.” Review of Radical Political Economics, 50:1, 99–115.
37.
WallaceMichael, and DavidBrady. 2010. “Globalization or Spatialization? The World-wide Restructuring of the Labor Process.” Pp. 121–144 in McDonough, et. al.
