American Indian scholar, activist, and elder Vine Deloria, Jr. asked why Western peoples have such a negative view of the physical world. The instrumentalism of market relationality, from the emergence of coinage to the mature development of capital, suggests an answer. Looking beyond market relationality means understanding the social belonging of the individual as a premise of social life, a view Marx and Deloria appear to share. Socialists can look to indigenous thought for insight into refashioning community and labor in the perspective of communal belonging. The term “kincentric” extends our understanding of community in the spirit of the Lakota phrase, Mitakuye Oyasin, “we are all related”; “philial labor” is introduced to characterize labor animated by the principle of “from each according to ability, to each according to need.”
BrundigeLorraine. 1997. “The Ungrateful Indian: Continuity of Native Values.” In Ayaangwaamizin: The International Journal of Indigenous Philosophy, 1:1.
2.
BurkhartBrian. 2019. Indigenizing Philosophy Through the Land: A Trickster Methodology for Decolonizing Environmental Ethics and Indigenous Futures.East Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State University Press.
3.
BurkhartBrian. 2016. “Locality Is a Metaphysical Fact - Theories of Coloniality and Indigenous Liberation Through Land: A Critical Look at Red Skin, White Masks.”American Philosophical Association Newsletter: Indigenous Philosophy, 15:2.
4.
CajeteGregory. 2000. Native Science: Natural Laws of Interdependence. Santa Fe, New Mexico: Clear Light Publishers.
5.
CordovaViola F.2007. How It Is: The Native American Philosophy of V. F. Cordova. MooreKathleen Dean, , eds. Tucson, Arizona: University of Arizona Press.
6.
CordovaViola F.2004. “Ethics: From an Artist's Point of View.” In Waters, ed.
7.
CoulthardGlen Sean. 2014. Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. Minneapolis, Minnesota/London: University of Minnesota Press.
DeloriaVineJr., and DanielWildcat. 2001. Power and Place: Indian Education in America.Golden, Colorado: Fulcrum Publishing.
10.
Dunbar-OrtizRoxane. 2014. An Indigenous Peoples’ History of the United States.Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon.
11.
EngelskirchenHoward. 2011. Capital as a Social Kind: Definitions and Transformations in the Critique of Political Economy. London/New York: Routledge.
12.
ForbesJack D.1998. “Intellectual Self-Determination and Sovereignty: Implications for Native Studies and Native Intellectuals.” In Wicazo Sa Review, 13:1.
13.
GuevaraChe. 2003 (1965). “Socialism and Man in Cuba.” In The Che Reader.Melbourne, Australia: Ocean Press.
14.
KimmererRobin Wall. 2013. Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge, and the Teachings of Plants. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Milkweed.
15.
MartinezDennis. 2018. “Redefining Sustainability through Kincentric Ecology: Reclaiming Indigenous Lands, Knowledge, and Ethics.” In NelsonM. and ShillingD., eds., Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Learning from Indigenous Practices for Environmental Sustainability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
MarxKarl. 1973. Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough Draft). London: Penguin.
17.
MarxKarl. 1989. “Critique of the Gotha Programme.” In Marx Engels Collected Works, Vol. 24. New York: International Publishers.
18.
MarxKarl. 1990. Capital.Vol. I. London: Penguin.
19.
MarxKarl. 1991. Capital.Vol. III. London: Penguin.
20.
MarxKarl1992a. Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. In Early Writings. London: Penguin.
21.
MarxKarl. 1992b. “On the Jewish Question.” In Early Writings.London: Penguin.
22.
MarxKarl and FrederickEngels. 1976. The German Ideology. In Marx Engels Collected Works, Vol. 5. New York: International Publishers.
23.
MitchellSherri L.2018. Sacred Instructions: Indigenous Wisdom for Living Spirit Based Change. Berkeley, California: North Atlantic Books.
24.
Red Nation. 2019. “Revolutionary Socialism is the Primary Political Ideology of the Red Nation” (September 7).
25.
SalmonEnrique. 2000. “Kincentric Ecology: Indigenous Perceptions of the Human-Nature Relationship.” In Ecological Applications, 10:5.
26.
SeafordRichard. 2004. Money and the Early Greek Mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
SeafordRichard. 2012. “Monetisation and the Genesis of the Western Subject.” Historical Materialism, 20:1.
28.
SeafordRichard. 2020. The Origins of Philosophy in Ancient Greece and Ancient India: A Historical Comparison.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
SimpsonLeanne Betasamosake. 2017. As We Have Always Done.Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
30.
SmithAdam. 1976. The Wealth of Nations. E. Cannan, ed. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Sohn-RethelAlfred. 1978. Intellectual and Manual Labour: A Critique of Epistemology.Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
32.
TinkerGeorge E.1996. “An American Indian Theological Response to Ecojustice.” In Weaver, ed.
33.
VerneyMarilyn Notah. 2004. “On Authenticity.” In Waters, ed.
34.
VimalasseryManu. 2016. “The Wealth of Natives: Towards a Critique of Settler-Colonial Political Economy.” In Wolfe, ed.
35.
WatersAnne, ed. 2004. American Indian Thought. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
36.
WeaverJace, ed. 1996. Defending Mother Earth: Native American Perspectives on Environmental Justice. Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books.
37.
WhittLaurie Anne. 2004. “Biocolonialism and the Commodification of Knowledge.” In Waters, ed.
38.
WildcatDaniel. 2009. Red Alert: Saving the Planet with Indigenous Knowledge. Golden, Colorado: Fulcrum Publishing.
39.
WolfePatrick, ed. 2016. The Settler Complex: Recuperating Binarism in Colonial Studies. Los Angeles, California: UCLA American Indian Studies Center.
40.
WolfePatrick. 2006. “Settler Colonialism and the Elimination of the Native.” Journal of Genocide Research, 8:40.
