Scientists' Perceptions of Organizational Justice and Self-Reported Misbehaviors

Abstract

Policymakers concerned about maintaining the integrity of science have recently expanded their attention from a focus on misbehaving individuals to characteristics of the environments in which scientists work. Little empirical evidence exists about the role of organizational justice in promoting or hindering scientific integrity. Our findings indicate that when scientists believe they are being treated unfairly they are more likely to behave in ways that compromise the integrity of science. Perceived violations of distributive and procedural justice were positively associated with self-reports of misbehavior among scientists.

Keywords

scientific misbehavior integrity organizational justice procedural justice distributive justice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

J. S.

(1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.

Agnew

(1985). A revised strain theory of delinquency. Social Forces, 64, 151–167.

Agnew

(1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–87.

Agnew

(1995a). The contribution of social-psychological strain theory to the explanation of crime and delinquency. In Adler

& Laufer

(Eds.), The legacy of anomie theory (pp. 113–137). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Agnew

(1995b). Testing the leading crime theories: An alternative strategy focusing on motivational processes. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32(4), 363–398.

Anderson

Louis

, & Earle

(1994). Disciplinary and departmental effects on observations of faculty and graduate student misconduct. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 331–350.

Babco

E. L.

, & Jesse

J. K.

(2003). What does the future of the scientific labor market look like? Looking back and looking forward—http://www.Cpst.Org/future.Pdf (Symposium presentation—2003 AAAS Annual Meetings). Washington, D.C.: Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology.

Bebeau

M. J.

(2000). Influencing the moral dimensions of professional practice: Implications for teaching and assessing for research integrity. Bethesda, MD: Paper presented at the 2000 ORI Research Conference on Research Integrity.

Bhattacharjee

(2005). Higher education: Princeton resets family-friendly tenure clock. Science, 309(5739), 1308b-.

10.

Bies

R. J.

, & Tripp

T. M.

(1998). Revenge in organizations: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In Griffin

R. W.

O'Leary-Kelly

& Collins

J. M.

(Eds.), Dysfunctional behavior in organizations: Non-violent dysfunctional behavior (pp. 49–67). Stamford, CN: JAI Press Inc.

11.

Braxton

(1993). Deviancy from the norms of science: The effects of anomie and alienation in the academic profession. Research in Higher Education, 34(2), 213–228.

12.

Butz

W. P.

Bloom

G. A.

Gross

M. E.

Kelly

T. K.

Kofner

, & Rippen

H. E.

(2003). Is there a shortage of scientists and engineers? How would we know? (No. IP-241-OSTP). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

13.

Clay-Warner

(2001). Perceiving procedural injustice: The effects of group membership and status. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64(3), 224–238.

14.

Clayton

, & Opotow

(2003). Justice and identity: Changing perspectives on what is fair. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 298–310.

15.

Colquitt

J. A.

(2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400.

16.

Colquitt

J. A.

Conlon

D. E.

Wesson

M. J.

Porter

C. O.

, & Ng

K. Y.

(2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445.

17.

Colquitt

J. A.

Noe

R. A.

, & Jackson

C. L.

(2002). Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55(1).

18.

De Vries

Anderson

M. S.

, & Martinson

B. C.

(2006). Normal misbehavior: Scientists talk about the ethics of research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(1), 43–50.

19.

Deutsch

(1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137–149.

20.

Dillman

D. A.

(2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

21.

Etzkowitz

(1983). Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in american academic science. Minerva, 21, 198–233.

22.

Fischer

B. A.

, & Zigmond

M. J.

(2001). Promoting responsible conduct in research through ‘survival skills’ workshops: Some mentoring is best done in a crowd. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 563–587.

23.

Folger

(1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108–119.

24.

Folger

, & Cropanzano

(1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishers.

25.

Freeman

Weinstein

Marincola

Rosenbaum

, & Solomon

(2001). Competition and careers in biosciences. Science, 294(5550), 2293–2294.

26.

Gilliland

S. W.

, & Beckstein

B. A.

(1996). Procedural and distributive justice in the editorial review process. Personnel Psychology, 49(3), 669–691.

27.

Goodstein

(1999). Conduct and misconduct in science—http://www.Its.Caltech.Edu/∼dg/conduct_art.Html (Website).

28.

Greenberg

(1988). Equity and workplace status: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 606–613.

29.

Greenberg

(1993). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 81–103.

30.

Greenberg

(1997). A social influence model of employee theft: Beyond the fraud triangle. In Lewicki

R. J.

Bies

R. J.

& Sheppard

B. H.

(Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (pp. 29–51). Greenwich, CT: Jai Press Inc.

31.

Greenberg

, & Cropanzano

(Eds.). (2001). Advances in organizational justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

32.

Gunsalus

C. K.

(1998). Preventing the need for whistleblowing: Practical advice for university administrators. Science and Engineering Ethics, 4(1), 75–94.

33.

Hackett

(1990). Science as a vocation in the 1990s. Journal of Higher Education, 61(3), 241–279.

34.

Hackett

(1999). A social control perspective on scientific misconduct. In Braxton

(Ed.), Perspectives on scholarly misconduct in the sciences (pp. 99–115). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.

35.

Hosek

S. D.

Cox

A. G.

Ghosh-Dastidar

Kofner

Ramphal

Scott

(2005). Gender differences in major federal external grant programs (No. TR-307-NSF). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

36.

Institute of Medicine and National Research Council Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments. (2002). Integrity in scientific research: Creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

37.

Juliano

R. L.

(2003). A shortage of Ph.Ds? Science, 301(5634), 763b-.

38.

Juliano

R. L.

, & Oxford

G. S.

(2001). Critical issues in phd training for biomedical scientists. Academic Medicine, 76(10), 1005–1012.

39.

Kennedy

Austin

Urquhart

, & Taylor

(2004). Supply without demand. Science, 303(5661), 1105.

40.

Keith-Speigel

Koocher

G. P.

& Tabachnick

(2006). What scientists want from their research ethics committee. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(1), 67–82.

41.

Ladd

E. J.

, & Lipset

(1978). Technical report 1977 survey of the american professoriate. Storrs, CT: Social Data Center, University of Connecticut.

42.

Lamont

(2003, September 8, 2003). Distributive justice. Fall 2003. Retrieved November 1, 2004, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2003/entries/justice-distributive/.

43.

Leventhal

G. S.

(1976). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In Berkowitz

& Walster

(Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 91–131). New York: Academic Press.

44.

Leventhal

G. S.

(1980). What should be done with equity theory? In Gergen

K. J.

Greenberg

M. S.

& Willis

R. H.

(Eds.), Social exchanges: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum.

45.

Lind

E. A.

, & Tyler

T. R.

(1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.

46.

Martinson

B. C.

Anderson

M. S.

, & De Vries

(2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435(7043), 737–738.

47.

Masterson

S. S.

Lewis

Goldman

B. M.

, & Taylor

M. S.

(2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 738–748.

48.

Matschinger

Siegrist

, & Dittmann

(1986). Type A as a coping career—toward a conceptual and methodological redefinition. In Schmidt

Dembroski

& Blumchen

(Eds.), Biological and psychological factors in cardiovascular disease. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

49.

Merton

R. K.

(1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672–682.

50.

Merton

R. K.

(1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63.

51.

Merton

R. K.

(1988). The Matthew effect in science, ii: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis, 79, 607–623.

52.

Monastersky

(2005). The number that's devouring science. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(8), A12.

53.

Moorman

R. H.

(1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845–855.

54.

National Research Council. (1994). The funding of young investigators in the biological and biomedical sciences. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

55.

Noel

J. G.

Wann

D. L.

, & Branscombe

N. R.

(1995). Peripheral ingroup membership, status and public negativity towards outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 127–137.

56.

Organ

(1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

57.

OSTP. Federal policy on research misconduct—http://www.Ostp.Gov/html/001207_3.Html. U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy, Executive Office of the President.

58.

Peter

Alfredsson

Hammar

Siegrist

Theorell

, & Westerholm

(1998). High effort, low reward, and cardiovascular risk factors in employed swedish men and women: Baseline results from the wolf study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 52, 540–547.

59.

Pfeffer

, & Langton

(1993). The effects of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 382–407.

60.

Podsakoff

MacKenzie

Paine

, & Bacharach

(2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563.

61.

Rajan

T. V.

(2005). Biomedical scientists are engaged in a pyramid scheme. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(39), b16.

62.

Siegrist

(1996). Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1(1), 27–41.

63.

Siegrist

(2001). A theory of occupational stress. In Dunham

(Ed.), Stress in the workplace (pp. 52–66). London and Philadelphia: Whurr Publishers.

64.

Skarlicki

D. P.

, & Folger

(1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434–443.

65.

Skitka

L. J.

(2003). Of different minds: An accessible identity model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 286–297.

66.

Skitka

L. J.

, & Crosby

F. J.

(2003). Trends in the social psychological study of justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 282–285.

67.

Swazey

J. M.

Anderson

M. S.

, & Louis

K. S.

(1993). Ethical problems in academic research. American Scientist, 81, 542–553.

68.

Teitelbaum

M. S.

(2003). Do we need more scientists? The Public Interest, 153(Fall), 40–53.

69.

Thibaut

J. W.

, & Walker

(1975). Procedural justice: A psychological perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

70.

Tyler

T. R.

(1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830–838.

71.

Tyler

T. R.

, & Blader

S. L.

(2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

72.

Tyler

T. R.

, & Blader

S. L.

(2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349–361.

73.

Weber

(1946). Science as a vocation. In Gerth

& Mills

(Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 129–156). New York: Oxford University Press.

74.

Ziman

(1990). Research as a career. In Cozzens

(Eds.), The research system in transition (pp. 345–359). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.