Resisting Power and Influence: A Case Study in Virtue Ethics

Abstract

This is a case study based on the author's experience while serving as an ethics committee (IRB) chair in New York City. It addresses the issues of power and coercion as they apply to the human research participants protection process. It primarily focuses on the power imbalance that can exist between research participants and their IRB advocates on the one hand and the research institutions, funding agencies, and investigators with their unlimited resources on the other. IRB Chairs and IRB leaders must be fire-walled from conflicts of interest arising not just from financial factors but from factors related to power, hierarchy, structure, and control. Senior staff, IRB members, administrators and ethicists best advocate for human volunteers in research through personal identification and solidarity.

Keywords

power influence hierarchy control IRB autonomy advocacy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angell

& Relman

(2001, June 20). Prescription for Profit. The Washington Post, p. A27.

Nelson

(2001, June 21). Message on IRB Forum listserve (formerly mcwirb) entitled “The debate over exposure to research risk without direct benefit”.

Rorty

(1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Scialabba

(1989, December 4). Disenchantment and democracy [Review of the book Contingency, Irony and Solidarity, by Richard Rorty.]. The Nation, 685–688.

Schweitzer

(1965). The teaching of reverence for life. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.