Applying Research Ethics Guidelines: The View from a Sub-Saharan Research Ethics Committee

Abstract

Considerable variation has been demonstrated in applying regulations across research ethics committees (RECs) in the U.S., U.K., and European nations. With the rise of international research collaborations, RECs in developing countries apply a variety of international regulations. We conducted a qualitative descriptive pilot study with members of the national REC in Malawi to determine criteria they use to review research, and their views on international collaborations. Qualitative content analysis demonstrated that international guidelines are interpreted in light of local African conditions such that emphasis is placed on examining benefit to the community and ensuring the informed consent process translates concepts in locally-meaningful ways. Members suggest that RECs often must comply with regulations that do not fit local conditions. Recommendations are provided for improving such international collaborations.

Keywords

Research ethics ethics review REC Africa

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agre

Campbell

F.A.

Goldman

B.D.

Boccia

M.L.

Kass

McCullough

L.B.

Merz

J.F.

Miller

S.M.

Mintz

Rapkin

Sugarman

Sorenson

, & Wirshing

(2003). Improving informed consent: The medium is not the message. IRB, 2003 Sep-Oct; Suppl 25(5): S11–S19.

Alberti

(1995). Local research ethics committees. British Medical Journal, 311, 639–640.

Alberti

(2000). Multicentre research ethics committees: Has the cure been worse than the disease? British Medical Journal, 320, 1157–1158.

Amdur

R.J.

, & Banker

E.A.

, (Eds.). (2005). Institutional review board: Managementand function (2nd ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

Angell

(1988). Ethical imperialism? Ethics in collaborative clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine, 319, 1081–1083.

Bell

Whiton

, & Connelly

(1998). Evaluation of NIH Implementation of Section 491 of the Public Health Service Act, Mandating a Program of Protection for Research Subjects. (DHHS Publication No. N01-OD-2-2109). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Benatar

S.R.

(2000). Avoiding exploitation in clinical research. Cambridge Quarterly of Health Care Ethics, 9, 562–565.

Benatar

S.R.

(2004). Towards progress in resolving dilemmas in international research ethics. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics, Winter, 574–581.

Bhutta

Z.A.

(2002). Ethics in international health research: A perspective from the developing world. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 80(2), 114–120.

10.

Bhutta

Z.A.

(2004). Beyond informed consent. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, (82) 10, 771–778.

11.

Campbell

E.G.

Weissman

J.S.

Vogeli

Clarridge

B.R.

Abraham

Marder

J.E.

(2006) Financial relationships between institutional review board members and industry. New England Journal of Medicine, 355(22), 2321–2329.

12.

Chima

S.C.

(2007). Regulation of biomedical research in Africa. British Medical Journal 332, 848–851.

13.

Churchill

Nelson

Henderson

King

Davis

Leahey

(2003). Assessing benefits in clinical research: Why diversity in benefit assessment can be risky. IRB, 25(3), 1–8.

14.

Coker

& McKee

(2001). Ethical approval for health research in central and eastern Europe: An international survey. Clinical Medicine 1, 3: 197–199.

15.

Corneli

Bentley

Sorenson

Henderson

Moses

Nkhoma

Tenthani

Ahmed

Heilig

Jamieson

, & van der Horst

(2007). Using formative research to develop a context-specific approach to informed consent for clinical trials. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(4), 45–60.

16.

Corneli

Sorenson

Nkhoma

Moses

Zulu

Chilima

(2004). Proceedings from XV International AIDS Conference: Evaluation of three informed consent processes for a clinical trial on the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV through breastfeeding in Lilongwe, Malawi. Bangkok, Thailand.

17.

Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). (2002). International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Retrieved March 16, 2007, from http://www.who.int/tdr/publications/publications/ethics.htm. http://www.cioms.ch/frame_guidelines_nov_2002.htm.

18.

Dawson

, & Kass

(2005). Views of US researchers about informed consent in international collaborative research. Social Science and Medicine, 61, 1211–1222.

19.

Del Rio

(1998). Is ethical research feasible in developed and developing countries? Bioethics, 4, 328–330.

20.

Department of Health and Human Services. Office of Inspector General (1998). Institutional review boards: A time for reform. (DHHS Publication No. OEI-01-97-00193). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

21.

Fitzgerald

D.W.

Marotte

Verdier

R.I.

Johnson

W.D.

, & Pape

J. W.

(2002). Comprehension during informed consent in a less-developed country. Lancet 360 (9342), 1301–1302.

22.

Flory

, & Emanuel

(2004). Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292, 1593–1601.

23.

Goldin

C.S.

(1994). Stigmatization and AIDS: Critical issues in public health. Social Science & Medicine, 39(9), 359–366.

24.

Hunter

(2005). Is multicenter collaborative research in clinical genetics dead, and if so, what killed it? American Journal of Medical Genetics, 134A, 237–259.

25.

Ijsselmuiden

C.B.

, & Faden

R.R.

(1992). Research and informed consent in Africa—Another look. New England Journal of Medicine, 326(8), 30–4.

26.

Karim

Q.A.

Karim

S.S.A.

Coovadia

H.M.

, & Susser

(1998). Informed consent for HIV testing in a South African hospital: Is it truly informed and truly voluntary? American Journal of Public Health, 88, 637–640.

27.

Kasenene

(1994). African Ethical Theory and the Four Principles. In Gillon

(Ed.), Principles of Health Care Ethics (183–192). New York: John Wiley and Sons.

28.

Kass

Sugarman

Faden

, & Schoch-Spana

(1996). Trust, the fragile foundation of contemporary biomedical research. Hastings Center Repor., 26(5), 25–29.

29.

Kass

Hyder

A.A.

Ajuwon

Appiah-Poku

Barsdorf

Elsayed

D.E.

Mokhachane

Mupenda

Ndebele

Ndossi

Sikateyo

Tangwa

, & Tindana

(2007). The structure and function of research ethics committees in Africa: A case study. PLoS Medicine, 4, 1: 0026–0031.

30.

Kirigia

J.M.

Wambebe

, & Baba-Mousa . (2005). Status of national research bioethics committees in the WHO African region. BMC Medical Ethics 6: 10.

31.

Macklin

(1999). Against relativism: Cultural diversity and the search for ethical universals in medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.

32.

McWilliams

Hoover-Fong

Hamosh

Beck

Beaty

, & Cutting

(2003). Problematic variation in local institutional review of a genetic epidemiology study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 290, 360–366.

33.

National Bioethics Advisory Commission. (2001). Ethical and policy issues in international research: Clinical trials in developing countries. Volume I, Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Bethesda, MD.

34.

Nelson

D.K.

(2006a). Conflict of interest: Researchers. In: Amdur

R. J.

& Bankert

E. A.

(Eds.), Institutional review board: Management and function (2nd ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

35.

Nelson

D.K.

(2006b) Conflict of interest: IRBs. In: Amdur

R. J.

and Bankert

E. A.

(Eds.), Institutional review board: Management and function (2nd ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

36.

Participants in the 2001 Conference on Ethical Aspects of Research in Developing Countries. (2002). Fair benefits for research in developing countries. Science, 298(5601), 2133–2134.

37.

Silverman

Hull

S.C.

, & Sugarman

(2001). Variability among institutional review boards' decisions within the context of a multicenter trial. Critical Care Medicine, 2, 235–241.

38.

Sugarman

Popkin

Fortney

, & Rivera

(2001). International perspectives on protecting human research subjects. Commissioned paper in: Ethical and policy issues in international research: Clinical trials in developing countries. Volume II, Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Bethesda, MD. E1–E11.

39.

Woodsong

, & Karim

Q.A.

(2005). A model designed to enhance informed consent: Experiences from the HIV prevention trials network. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 412–419.

40.

World Health Organization. (2000). Operational guidelines for ethics committees that review biomedical research. Retrieved March 16, 2007, from http://www.who.int/tdr/publications/publications/ethics.htm.