This study examined basic personality characteristics, narcissism, and cynicism as predictors of ethical decision-making among graduate students training for careers in the sciences. Participants completed individual difference measures along with a scenario-based ethical decision-making measure that captures the complex, multifaceted nature of ethical decision-making in scientific research. The results revealed that narcissism and cynicism (individual differences influencing self-perceptions and perceptions of others) showed consistently negative relationships with aspects of ethical decision-making, whereas more basic personality characteristics (e.g., conscientiousness, agreeableness) were less consistent and weaker. Further analyses examined the relationship of personality to metacognitive reasoning strategies and social-behavioral response patterns thought to underlie ethical decision-making. The findings indicated that personality was associated with many of these social-cognitive mechanisms which might, in part, explain the association between personality and ethical decisions.
AmesD. R. & KammrathL. K. (2004). Mind-reading and metacognition: Narcissism, not actual competence, predicts self-estimated ability. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 187–209.
2.
AndersonC. J. (2003). The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 139–168.
3.
AnderssonL. M. (1996). Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49, 1395–1418.
4.
AnderssonL. M. & BatemanT. S. (1997). Cynicism in the workplace: Some causes and effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 449–469.
5.
ArgandoñaA. (1999). Sharing out in alliances: Trust and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 21, 217–228.
6.
BakkerA. B. & HeuvenE. (2006). Emotional dissonance, burnout, and in-role performance among nurses and police officers. International Journal of Stress Management, 13, 423–440.
7.
BarrickM. R. & MountM. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.
8.
BarrickM. R.MountM. K. & JudgeT. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next?International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30.
9.
Benet-MartinezV. & JohnO. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729–750.
10.
BetanE. J. & StantonA. L. (1999). Fostering ethical willingness: Integrating emotional and contextual awareness with rational analysis. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 295–301.
11.
BeuD. S.BuckleyM. R. & HarveyM. G. (2003). Ethical decision-making: A multidimensional construct. Business Ethics: A European Review, 12, 88–107.
12.
BrownM. E. & TreviñoL. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616.
13.
BrownM. E.TreviñoL. K. & HarrisonD. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.
14.
BushmanB. J. & BaumeisterR. F. (1998). Threatened egoism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 219–229.
15.
ButterfieldK. D.TreviñoL. K. & WeaverG. R. (2000). Moral awareness in business organizations: Influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human Relations, 53, 981–1018.
16.
CampbellW. K. & FosterJ. D. (2007). The narcissistic self: Background, and extended agency model, and ongoing controversies. In SedikidesC. & SpencerS. (Eds.), Frontiers in social psychology: The self (pp. 115–138). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
17.
CampbellW. K.BonacciA. M.SheltonJ.ExlineJ. J. & BushmanB. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 29–45.
18.
CampbellW. K.BushC. P.BrunellA. B. & SheltonJ. (2005). Understanding the social costs of narcissism: The case of the tragedy of the commons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1358–1368.
19.
CampbellW. K.ReederG. D.SedikidesC. & ElliotA. J. (2000). Narcissism and comparative self-enhancement strategies. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 329–347.
20.
ChenD. T. (2003). Curricular approaches to research ethics training for psychiatric investigator. Psychopharmacology171, 112–119.
21.
ChristensenS. L. & KohlsJ. (2003). Ethical decision-making in time of organizational crisis. Business and Society, 42, 328–358.
22.
ConnellyS.Helton-FauthW. & MumfordM. D. (2004). A managerial in-basket study of the impact of trait emotions on ethical choice. Journal of Business Ethics, 51, 245–267.
23.
CrockerJ. & ParkL. E. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 392–414.
24.
CroskerryP. (2003). The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Academic Medicine, 78, 775–780.
25.
DarkeP. R. & ChaikenS. (2005). The pursuit of self-interest: Self-interest bias in attitude judgment and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 864–883.
26.
DicksonM. W.SmithD. B.GrojeanM. W. & EhrhartM. (2001). An organizational climate regarding ethics: The outcome of leader values and the practices that reflect them. Leadership Quarterly, 12, 197–217.
27.
DunningD.JohnsonK.EhrlingerJ. & KrugerJ. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 83–87.
28.
EastmanJ. K.EastmanK. L. & TolsonM. A. (2001). The relationship between ethical ideology and ethical behavior intentions: An exploratory look at physicians' responses to managed care dilemmas. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 209–224.
29.
EmmonsR. A. (1984). Factor analysis and construct validity of the narcissistic personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 291–300.
30.
EmmonsR. A. (1987). Narcissism: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 11–17.
31.
ExlineJ. J.BaumeisterR. F.BushmanB. J.CampbellW. K. & FinkelE. J. (2004). Too proud to let go: Narcissistic entitlement as a barrier to forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 894–912.
32.
ExlineJ. J.SingleP. B.LobelM. & GeyerA. L. (2004). Growing praise and the envious gaze: Social dilemmas surrounding the public recognition of achievement. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 119–130.
33.
FeistG. J. (1994). Personality and working style predictors of integrative complexity: A study of scientists' thinking about research and teaching. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 474–484.
34.
FeistG. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.
35.
FischerB. A. & ZigmondM. J. (2001). Promoting responsible conduct in research through “survival skills” workshops: Some mentoring is best done in a crowd. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 563–587.
36.
FordR. C. & RichardsonW. D. (1994). Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 205–221.
37.
GaudineA. & ThorneL. (2001). Emotion and ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 175–187.
38.
GoldfarbJ. (1991). The cynical society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
39.
GoodsteinL. D. & LanyonR. I. (1999). Applications of personality assessment to the workplace: A review. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 291–322.
40.
GuastelloS. J.RiekeM. L.GuastelloD. D. & BillingsS. W. (1992). A study of cynicism, personality, and work values. Journal of Psychology, 126, 37–48.
41.
HarringtonS. J. (1997). A test of a person-issue contingent model of ethical decision making in organization. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 363–375.
42.
Helton-FauthW. B.GaddisB.ScottG.MumfordM. D.DevenportL. D.ConnellyS. & BrownR. P. (2003). A new approach to assessing ethical conduct in scientific work. Accountability in Research, 10, 205–228.
43.
HoganJ. & HollandB. (2003). Using theory to evaluate personality and job-performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 100–112.
44.
JenkinsV. & FallowfieldL. (2002). Can communication skills training alter physicians' beliefs and behavior in clinics?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20, 765–769.
45.
JohnO. P. & SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A. & JohnOliver P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–139). New York: Guilford Press.
46.
JohnO. P.DonahueE. M. & KentleR. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory—Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
47.
JohnsonJ. L. & O'Leary-KellyA. M. (2003). The effects of psychological contract breach and organizational cynicism: Not all social exchange violations are created equal. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 627–647.
48.
JudgeT. A.LePineJ. A. & RichB. L. (2006). Loving yourself abundantly: Relationship of the narcissistic personality to self- and other perceptions of workplace deviance, leadership, and task and contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 762–776.
49.
KahnemanD. (2003). A psychological perspective on economics. American Economic Review, 93, 162–168.
50.
KanterD. L. & MirvisP. H. (1989). The cynical Americans: Living and working in an age of discontent and disillusion. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51.
KnausW. J. (2000). Procrastination, blame, and change. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 15, 153–167.
52.
KorenmanS. G.BerkR.WengerN. S. & LewV. (1998). Evaluation of the research norms of scientists and administrators responsible for academic research integrity. Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 41–47.
53.
LibermanV.SamuelsS. M. & RossL. (2004). The name of the game: Predictive power of reputations versus situational labels in determining prisoner's dilemma game moves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1175–1185.
54.
LovellA. (2002). Ethics as a dependent variable in individual and organizational decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 37, 145–163.
55.
LundD. B. (2000). An empirical examination of marketing professionals' ethical behavior in differing situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 24, 331–342.
56.
MalinowskiC. & BergerK. A. (1996). Undergraduate student attitudes about hypothetical marketing dilemmas. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 525–535.
57.
MarkmanK. D. & TetlockP. E. (2000). 'I couldn't have known': Accountability, foreseeability and counterfactual denials of responsibility. British Journal of Social Psychology39, 313–325.
58.
MartinsonB. C.AndersonM. S.CrainA. L. & De VriesR. (2006). Scientists' perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1, 51–66.
59.
McCraeR. R. & CostaP. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
60.
MeyersonD. E. (1990). Uncovering socially undesirable emotions: Experiences of role ambiguity in organizations. American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 296–307.
61.
MinerM. & PetoczA. (2003). Moral theory in ethical decision making: Problems, clarifications, and recommendations from a psychological perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 11–25.
62.
MooreD. A. & LoewensteinG. (2004). Self-interest, automaticity, and the psychology of conflict of interest. Social Justice Research, 17, 189–202.
63.
MorfC. C. & RhodewaltF. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 177–196.
64.
MotowidloS. J.DunnetteM. D. & CarterG. W. (1990). An alternative selection measure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640–647.
65.
MumfordM. D.DevenportL. D.BrownR. P.ConnellyS.MurphyS. T.HillJ. H. & AntesA. L. (2006). Validation of ethical decision-making measures: Evidence for a new set of measures. Ethics and Behavior, 16, 319–345.
66.
MumfordM. D.ConnellyS.BrownR. P.MurphyS. T.HillJ. H.AntesA. L.WaplesE. P. & DevenportL. D. (in press). Sensemaking approach to ethics training for scientists: Preliminary evidence of training effectiveness. Ethics and Behavior, 18.
67.
MunroD.BoreM. & PowisD. (2005). Personality factors in professional ethical behaviour: Studies of empathy and narcissism. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57, 49–60.
68.
MurphyK. R. (2000). What constructs underlie measures of honesty or integrity? In GoffinR. & HelmesE. (Eds.), Problems and Solutions in Human Assessment: A Festschrift to Douglas N. Jackson at Seventy (pp. 265–284). London: Kluwer.
69.
MurphyK. R. & LeeS. L. (1994). Personality variables related to integrity test scores: The role of conscientiousness. Journal of Business and Psychology, 8, 413–424.
70.
MyersD. G. (2007). Psychology (8th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.
71.
O'ConnellB. J.HolzmanH. H. & ArmandiB. R. (1986). Police cynicism and the modes of adaptation. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 14, 307–313.
72.
O'FallonM. J. & ButterfieldK. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375–413.
73.
OnesD. S. & ViswesvaranC. (1998). Integrity testing in organizations. In GriffinR. W.O'Leary-KellyA. & CollinsJ. M. (Eds.), Dysfunctional behavior in organizations. Vol. 23B: Nonviolent Dysfunctional Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
74.
OnesD. S.ViswesvaranC. & SchmidtF. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679–703.
75.
PenneyL. M. & SpectorP. E. (2002). Narcissism and counterproductive work behavior: Do bigger egos mean bigger problems?International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 126–134.
76.
RaskinR. & TerryH. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902.
77.
RhodewaltF. & MorfC. C. (1995). Self and interpersonal correlates of the narcissistic personality inventory: A review and new findings. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 1–23.
78.
RobertsonD. C. & RymonT. (2001). Purchasing agents' deceptive behavior: A randomized response technique study. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11, 455–479.
79.
RobertsonD. C. & SchlegelmilchB. B. (1993). Corporate institutionalization of ethics in the United States and Great Britain. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 301–312.
80.
RobinD. P.ReidenbachR. E. & ForrestP. J. (1996). The perceived importance of an ethical issue as an influence on the ethical decision-making of ad managers. Journal of Business Research, 35, 17–28.
81.
RooplekhaK. & DamodarS. (2003). Do higher-order needs influence unethical practices and work behavior?Psychological Studies, 48, 43–51.
82.
SchweitzerM. E.DeChurchL. A. & GibsonD. E. (2005). Conflict frames and the use of deception: Are competitive negotiators less ethical?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2123–2149.
83.
SimsR. I. & KeonT. L. (1999). Determinants of ethical decision making: The relationship of the perceived organizational environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 19, 393–401.
84.
SmithT. W.PopeM. K.SandersJ. D.AllredK. D. & O'KeefeJ. L. (1988). Cynical hostility at home and at work: Psychological vulnerability across domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 525–548.
85.
SrivastavaS.JohnO. P.GoslingS. D. & PotterJ. (2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1041–1053.
86.
SteadW. E.WorrellD. L. & SteadJ. G. (1990). An integrative model of understanding and management ethical behavior in business organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 233–242.
87.
SteinelW. & De DreuC. K. W. (2004). Social motives and strategic misrepresentation in social decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 419–434.
88.
StreetM. D.DouglasS. C.GeigerS. W. & MartinkoM. J. (2001). The impact of cognitive expenditure on the ethical decision-making process: The cognitive elaboration model. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 86, 256–277.
89.
TenbrunselA. E. (1998). Misrepresentation and expectations of misrepresentation in an ethical dilemma: The role of incentives and temptation. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 330–339.
90.
TenbrunselA. E. & MessickD. M. (2004). Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research, 17, 223–236.
91.
TerpstraD. E.RozellE. J. & RobinsonR. K. (1993). The influence of personality and demographic variables on ethical decision related to insider trading. Journal of Psychology, 127, 375–389.
92.
ThomasE. J.SextonJ. B.HelmreichR. L. (2003). Discrepant attitudes about teamwork among critical care nurses and physicians. Critical Care Medicine, 31, 956–959.
93.
ThomasJ. B.ClarkS. M. & GioiaD. A. (1993). Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 239–270.
94.
TreviñoL. K. & YoungbloodS. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 378–385.
95.
VerbekeW.OuwerkerkC. & PeelenE. (1996). Exploring the contextual and individual factors on ethical decision making of salespeople. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1175–1187.
96.
WallaceH. M. & BaumeisterR. F. (2002). The performance of narcissists rises and falls with perceived opportunity for glory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 819–834.
97.
WanousJ. P.ReichersA. E. & AustinJ. T. (1994). Organizational cynicism: An initial study. Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 269–482.
98.
WatleyL. D. & MayD. R. (2004). Enhancing moral intensity: The roles of personal and consequential information in ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 105–126.
99.
WrightsmanL. S. (1964). Measurement of philosophies of human nature. Psychological Reports, 14, 743–751.
100.
WrightsmanL. S. (1974). Assumptions about human nature: A social-psychological approach (1st ed.). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
101.
WrightsmanL. S. (1991). Interpersonal trust and attitudes toward human nature. In RobinsonJ. P.ShaverP. R. & WrightsmanL. S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. New York: Academic Press.
102.
WrightsmanL. S. (1992). Assumptions about human nature: Implications for researchers and practitioners. London: Sage Publications.
103.
YanivI. & KleinbergerE. (2000). Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 83, 260–281.
104.
YuthasK. & DillardJ. F. (1999). Ethical development of advanced technology: A postmodern stakeholder perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 19, 35–49.
