Sharing Data and Results with Study Participants: Report on a Survey of Cultural Anthropologists

Abstract

A first-ever survey of cultural anthropologists was conducted concerning the sharing of data, interpretations, and results with study participants. Briefly summarized, the study showed that almost all of the survey respondents had shared data or results with participants and almost all found this to be a positive experience. They had carried out research in many countries, some over long periods of time, and many had completed several field projects. Most believe that researchers, either alone or in consultation with participants and their groups, should decide whether, when, and what to share. Anthropologists find that sharing produces many benefits, for themselves as individuals and as researchers, for individual participants, and for the communities, groups, or institutions to which the latter belong. The perceived harms that might result from sharing have to do particularly with potential threats to privacy, confidentiality or anonymity, as well as the possibilities of social conflict and oppression. Thus, researchers have serious concerns about the sharing of certain kinds of data that might lead to such consequences. While many or most respondents think that sharing is the ethically proper course of action, they are very aware of the complexities of particular situations and the need for nuanced decision making. Most think that the researcher should play a major role in deciding whether sharing should take place and what should be shared. Hence, for these cultural anthropologists, in the end, sharing requires trying to balance the good of sharing with the good of doing no harm to those with whom they have done research.

Keywords

ethnographic research anthropology data sharing results sharing disclosure

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Anthropological Association. (1998a). Code of ethics. Retrieved August 24, 2006 from http://www.aaanet.org/committees/ethics/ethcode.htm.

American Anthropological Association (1998b). 1998 Survey of Departments Report. Retrieved August 24, 2006 from http://www.aaanet.org/surveys/98survey.htm.

American Anthropological Association (2007a). Final report of the AAA commission on the engagement of anthropology with the U.S. security and intelligence communities. Retrieved January 10, 2008 from http://www.aaanet.org/PM_112807.htm.

American Anthropological Association. (2007b). AAA opposes U.S. military's human terrain system project. Retrieved January10, 2008 from http://www.aaanet.org/blog/PR_110707.htm.

Association of Social Anthropologists. (1999). Ethical guidelines for good research practice. Retrieved August 24, 2007 from http://www.theasa.org/ethics/ethics_guidelines.htm.

Bell

J. G.

Brady

, & Copeland

L. J.

(2004). The ethics of reporting and disseminating results of clinical research trials. Cancer, 100(6), 1107–1109.

Bishop

(2005). Freeing ourselves from neo-colonial domination of research: A Kaupapa Maori approach to creating knowledge. In Denzin

N. K.

& Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd ed. (pp. 109–138). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Castellano

Brant M.

(2004). Ethics of aboriginal research. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 1(1), 98–114.

Brettell

C. B.

(Ed.) (1996). When they read what we write: The politics of ethnography. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.

10.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). (2007). Guidelines for health research involving aboriginal people. Retrieved August 14, 2008 from http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29134.html.

11.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Tri-Council). (2005). Tri-Council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa, Canada: Public Works and Government Services Canada. Retrieved on August 15, 2008 from http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/english/policystatement/policystatement.cfm.

12.

Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Association. (1994). Statement of professional ethics. Retrieved August 24, 2006 from http://www.csaa.ca/structure/Code.htm.

13.

Cooper

(2007). Sharing data and results in ethnographic research: Why this should not be an ethical imperative. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2(1), 3–19.

14.

Fernandez

C. V.

Kodish

, & Weijer

(2003). Informing study participants of research results: An ethical imperative. IRB, 25(3), 12–19.

15.

Fernandez

C. V.

Skedgel

, & Weijer

(2004). Considerations and costs of disclosing study findings to research participants. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 170(9), 1417–1419.

16.

Fluehr-Lobban

(2003). Ethics and anthropology 1890–2000: A review of issues and principles. In Fluehr-Lobban

(Ed.), Ethics and the profession of anthropology: Dialogue for ethically conscious practice, 2nd ed. (pp. 1–28). Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.

17.

Greenwood

D. J.

, & Levin

(2005). Reform of the social sciences, and of universities through action research. In Denzin

N. K.

& Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd ed. (pp. 43–64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

18.

Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics (PRE). (2006). Respect for dignity, culture, and knowledge in research involving aboriginal people. Ottawa, Canada: PRE.

19.

Jaarsma

S. R.

(Ed.). (2002). Handle with care: Ownership and control of ethnographic materials. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

20.

Kovats-Bernat

J. C.

(2002). Negotiating dangerous fields: Pragmatic strategies for fieldwork amid violence and terror. American Anthropologist, 104(1), 1–15.

21.

Lassiter

L. E.

(2005). The Chicago guide to collaborative ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

22.

MacNeil

S. D.

& Fernandez

C. V.

(2006). Informing research participants of research results: Analysis of Canadian university based research ethics board policies. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32(1), 49–54.

23.

Mann

(2002). Research ethics committees and public dissemination of clinical trial results. Lancet, 360(9330), 406–408.

24.

McFate

(n.d.). Does culture matter? The military utility of understanding adversary culture. Retrieved November 15, 2007 from http://www.e-mapsys.com/Cultural_Matters.pdf.

25.

Miller

F. A.

Christensen

Giacomini

, & Robert

J. S.

(2008). Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(3), 210–213.

26.

National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Retrieved August 14, 2008 from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html.

27.

Price

D. H.

(1998). Cold war anthropology: Collaborators and victims of the national security state. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 4(3–4), 389–430.

28.

Price

D. H.

(2002). Interlopers and invited guests: On anthropology's witting and unwitting links to intelligence agencies. Anthropology Today, 18(6), 16–21.

29.

Price

D. H.

(2003). Subtle means and enticing carrots: The impact of funding on American cold war anthropology. Critique of Anthropology, 23(4), 373–401.

30.

Price

D. H.

(2004). Anthropology and the United States military: Coming of age in the twenty-first century. American Anthropologist, 106(4), 758–759.

31.

Schnarch

(2004). Ownership, control, access, and possession (OCAP) or self-determination applied to research: A critical analysis of contemporary First Nations research and some options for First Nations communities. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 1(1), 80–95.

32.

Shore

Wong

K. A.

Seifer

S. D.

Grignon

, & Gamble

V.N.

(2008). Introduction to special issue: Advancing the ethics of community-based participatory research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(2), 1–4.

33.

Van den Hoonaard

W. C.

(2002). Walking the tightrope: Ethical issues for qualitative researchers. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

34.

Zmegac

J. C.

(2007). Strangers either way: The lives of Croatian refugees in their new home. New York: Berghahn Books Ltd.